DOC PREVIEW
U-M EECS 582 - Closing the loop between traffic/pollution sensing and vehicle route control

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Closing the loop between traffic/pollution sensing and vehicle route control The Vision: Our planet has become more urban than rural in the last decade, and the share of people living in metropolitan areas continues to rise with each passing year. Urban traffic has increased dramatically over the past three decades, making driving more stressful, costly, and unhealthy. According to the Texas Transportation Institute, the overall cost of (in the form of wasted fuel and lost economic productivity) metropolitan traffic congestion in the U.S. topped $87 billion in 2007, more than $750/year for every U.S. traveler. Drivers are not the only ones who suffer from the consequences of urban traffic. For residents, the health risks of air pollution seriously undermine the advantages of living in the city. As such, a systematic approach to traffic management requires a solution that must rely on real-time collection of traffic density and air pollution data, and it must feature real-time communication mechanisms for fine-grained traffic control. Our vision is to use modern wireless technology, environment monitoring, and urban traffic management to “close the loop” between urban sensing and vehicle route control with the aim of simultaneously reducing congestion, pollution, and traveler delays. The pivotal elements of this vision are the “intelligent” traffic signal, the traffic center, and the on-board navigator. In addition to the traditional control of vehicular flow at signalized intersections, future signal systems will sense traffic characteristics and vehicular emissions, collect data from vehicle sensors (pollution, emission, position, etc.), and broadcast traffic advisories, routings, and restrictions to on-board navigators. Central traffic controllers simulate traffic conditions, air pollution models and calculate traffic restrictions and incentives. Finally, the on-board navigators receive traffic information and incentives and calculate best routing taking into account drivers’ preferences. All this is enabled by efficient vehicle to roadway infrastructure communications, from 3G channels to DSRC radios (roadside and on-board) that enable real-time, low cost, scalable information exchanges among the various architecture components. Evidence: Compared with inter-city traffic, metropolitan travel presents a more complex set of conditions. Unlike inter-city highways, metropolitan transportation systems are multi-modal – accommodating pedestrians, bicycles, and motor scooters in addition to trucks and passenger vehicles. The large number of intersections in urban areas introduces many potential traffic conflicts and greatly reduces effective road capacities. Clearly, the granularity required for monitoring and managing urban traffic and air quality must be much finer than what is required outside of urban areas. Today, there is a broad spectrum of largely disconnected solutions to alleviate traffic congestion. At one end, there are system-focused solutions, such as coordinated, dynamic traffic signal timing and control. At the opposite end, there are vehicle-based solutions such as on-board navigators, which offer “optimal” routing options to drivers ignoring any external constraints. As a result, on-board navigators provide little help to drivers in calculating accurate driving times or determining fastest routes through a city, since such route planning critically depends on real-time, fine-grained information like signal timings and vehicle speeds that is not presently available to navigators. Moreover, current navigators completely ignore emissions effects and, therefore, are of little use in environmental planning. Congestion pricing, which aims to link the demand for travel with road capacity via variable priced tolls, has long been touted by economists, but in the absence of adequate vehicle monitoring and toll collection techniques it has been impractical to implement.. The question we aim to answer is how to connect existing solutions via state-of-the-art communications and networking to provide efficient, coordinated real-time traffic and air quality control.Details: The overarching goal of the proposed project is to develop and evaluate the benefits of a “green city” traffic management architecture that is composed of: (i) traffic sensors, (ii) traffic control center, (iii) intelligent traffic signals, and (iv) on-board navigators. Traffic sensors consist of both mobile urban sensors on vehicles and infrastructure sensors. The central traffic control system receives traffic and pollution data from vehicles and infrastructure elements, models congestion and pollutions using this data, and dispatches routing information and positive or negative incentives to vehicles. Intelligent traffic signals help the traffic center in the implementation of the global traffic plans by broadcasting traffic instructions to vehicles in their region. In addition, they locally adjust timing, and compute and broadcast traffic light state for vehicles approaching them. On board navigators use the provided information to choose the best route taking into account navigation costs/credits, driver’s goal and constraints. The closing of the loop between traffic and air quality data sensing and vehicle routing will enable an urban traffic management that can adjust to the rapidly changing traffic and air quality conditions typical of large cities. Such a project will necessarily be highly interdisciplinary; it will benefit from the collaboration and expertise of atmospheric science researchers, auto manufacturers, traffic signalization and control engineers, and vehicle navigation developers. To implement the proposed vision, research must address multiple challenges in the areas of urban sensing, emission models, traffic and pollution simulation, traffic management, control and enforcement, wireless networking, usability and human-computer interfaces, and security and privacy. For instance, pollution modeling is a major challenge. Pollution is non-uniformly distributed, being on average higher in close proximity to roadways, but vary widely on time scales of hours, which can


View Full Document
Download Closing the loop between traffic/pollution sensing and vehicle route control
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Closing the loop between traffic/pollution sensing and vehicle route control and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Closing the loop between traffic/pollution sensing and vehicle route control 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?