Unformatted text preview:

Routing Protocol EvaluationMobility ModelsRandom Waypoint MobilityRandom Waypoint PropertiesRandom Waypoint Properties (cont)Slide 6Modified Random WaypointOther Mobility ModelsRouting Performance MetricsRouting Protocol Evaluation MetricsDelivery RatioDelivery Ratio ExamplesLatencyLatency ExamplePath Length OptimalityPath Length Optimality ExampleControl OverheadControl Overhead ExampleRouting Protocol EvaluationDavid [email protected] ModelsRandom Waypoint MobilityTwo parametersPause Time (Pt)Max Speed (Vmax)Each node starts at a random locationExecutes loopPause for Pt secondsSelect a random destination (waypoint)Move to that destination at a random speed (0,Vmax)Repeat upon arrivalRandom Waypoint PropertiesAdvantagesEasy to implementAllows heterogeneous speeds and temporarily stationary nodesDisadvantagesNon-uniform node distribution (tend towards center)Un-stable instantaneous mobility (tends towards zero and oscillates)Random Waypoint Properties (cont)Random Waypoint Properties (cont)Modified Random WaypointNarrow the random speed range(.1 Vmax, .9 Vmax) instead of ( 0, Vmax )Pre-simulation mobilityMobility properties stabilize before routing and data commencesDoesn’t fix non-uniform node distributionOther Mobility ModelsBilliard ModelNode selects a random direction, speed, and timeMoves in that direction at that speed for that time and then repeats (may have pause time as well)Bounces off simulation boundary like a “billiard ball”Maintains uniform node distribution, and uniform average speed (due to time selection)Group mobility patternsNode mobility is sum of group mobility and individual mobilityUsed by clustering based routing protocols (well suited for certain applications like the military)Trace based mobility patternsRecord real life people/vehicle/etc. motion patternsRequires location hardware such as GPSDifficult to try variations or change “parameters”Routing Performance MetricsRouting Protocol Evaluation MetricsFour most common metricsDelivery RatioLatencyPath Length OptimalityControl OverheadDelivery RatioNumber of packets successfully received by the destination / number sent by the sourceEvaluated by setting up a number of “test” flows in the networkCommonly a number of constant bit rate (CBR) flows with a specified number of packets per secondUses UDP so every dropped packet results in a reduction of the delivery ratio (no end-to-end retransmissions)Congestion SensitiveA large enough test load will result in reduced delivery ratio for ANY protocol due to congestionMobility SensitiveIf the routing protocol does not respond quickly to topology change, then packets sent on links that no longer exist will be lostDelivery Ratio ExamplesDelivery Ratio vs. Test Load Delivery Ratio vs. MobilityLatencyThe time between the creation of a packet and its delivery to the destinationUsually measured using the same setup as delivery ratioCongestion sensitiveLatency will drastically increase as the congestion limit is reached (due to waiting in large buffers)Retransmission sensitiveProtocols that locally recover packets will achieve higher delivery ratio but will increase latencyOn-demand sensitiveProtocols that setup routes after data is sent will have higher latency on the initial packets of a flowLatency ExamplePath Length OptimalityThe difference between the length of the path used for sending packets in the protocol and the length of the best possible pathMeasurementProtocol path length observed for each packet using test flowsBest possible path computed offline using same mobility patternMeasure of protocol’s ability to track good routesExtra hops from non-optimal routes will result in increased congestion and medium utilizationPath Length Optimality ExampleControl OverheadNumber/size of routing control packets sent by the protocolCalculated using counters while simulating with test flowsSometimes expressed as a ratio of control to dataIndication of how efficiently a routing protocol operatesHigh control overhead may adversely affect delivery ratio and latency under higher loadsControl Overhead


View Full Document

Johns Hopkins EN 600 647 - Mobility Models

Documents in this Course
Mobile IP

Mobile IP

33 pages

WiMAX

WiMAX

31 pages

Load more
Download Mobility Models
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Mobility Models and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Mobility Models 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?