DOC PREVIEW
CU-Boulder GEOG 4712 - U.S. Hegemony at End of WWII

This preview shows page 1-2-3 out of 9 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 9 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 9 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 9 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 9 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

1U.S. Hegemony at End of WWII• All world powers in economic ruin at end of WWII, except the U.S.• The U.S. economy had expanded during the war• In 1945 the U.S. responsible for 50% of world’s production (1990: 21%)• Full hegemony blocked by ideological opponent: the USSRPossible Alliances Post-WWII1. Anti-Imperialism: USA and USSR vs. UK2. Anti-Hegemony: UK and USSR vs. USA3. Anti-Communism: USA and UK vs. USSRWhy did the third alliance form?Who Caused the Cold War?1. Orthodox School: USSR2. Revisionist School: USA3. Post-Revisionist School: USA & USSR4. Critical Geopolitics: UK2Regionalism vs. GlobalismRegionalism• The world is made up of a mosaic of diverse regions, need a complex foreign policy to deal with different places; not everywhere mattersGlobalism• Ideology supercedes regional complexity, regional variation is secondary; the whole world is a conflict zoneWhich approach is typical of U.S. geopolitics?Origin of Cold War Geopolitics• Mackinder focused on Russia / Central Asia as the center of land power, naming it first the Pivot, and later the Heartland. He thought East Europe was the key to controlling the Heartland; the key enemy is thus…• Spykman renames Mackinder’s “Inner Crescent” the “Rimland” – the contact zone between land and sea powers. Control over the Rimland could neutralize the Heartland.• The Rimland contains the majority of major (Berlin, Korea, Middle East, Vietnam) and minor conflicts.• Critique Mackinder and Spykman.Critique of Mackinder and Spykman• Oversimplified and theoretically impoverished– Why should control of E. Europe lead to control of Heartland?– Why is the Rimland so important when Soviet subs are sitting off the U.S. coast?– Undifferentiated space: regions are based only on geographic location (but at least there is geography)– What of non-communist opposition to U.S. resulting from U.S. containment?• Islamic fundamentalism• Pan-Arab nationalism3Geopolitical World Order: Cold War• A-geographical: triumph of globalism• geography no longer matters: fight communism everywhere, nothing else mattered• “I don’t see why we should let a country go Marxist just because its population is irresponsible” • “He may be a son-of-a-bitch, but he’s oursob.”• Containment: derived from assumptions about the USSR derived from George Kennan; but the containment adopted was not the containment Kennan advisedGeorge Kennan• Historian specializing in Russian studies • Diplomat in the U.S. Embassy in Moscow: WWII• History is key to understanding Russian psyche: fear of European invasion (Lithuanian and Polish invasions, Napoleon, Russian Revolution, Hitler - 20 million Russians died)• Russians are paranoid, and they are expansionist, but the communist ideology does not drive foreign policy• Feb 1946: the “Long Telegram” in which he advocated containment of Soviet expansionKennan’s “Long Telegram”The very teachings of Lenin himself require great caution and flexibility in the pursuit of communist purposes. Again, these precepts are fortified by the lessons of Russian history: of centuries of obscure battles between nomadic forces over the stretches of a vast unfortified plain. Here, caution, circumstance, flexibility and deception are the valuable qualities, and their value finds natural appreciation in the Russian or oriental mind.…the main element of any United States policy toward the Soviet Union must be that of a long-term, patient but firm and vigilant containment of Russian expansive tendencies.4Kennan’s Policy Prescriptions for the U.S.1. Rebuild economies in Japan and Western Europe (Marshall Plan), don’t rely on purely military strategy2. Use local troops 3. Don’t contribute to the Soviet Union’s paranoia 4. Reduce Soviet capacity to project power beyond its borders through:a) Selective containment (3 perimeters: Western Europe, East Asia, and Middle East)b) Divide international communism. Not monolithic political strategy - should be adapted to regional context.The Truman Doctrine (1947)• Truman convinces U.S. Congress to aid anti-communist governments in both Greece and Turkey• Truman’s speech dealt not with geographic specifics of the conflicts, but with over-arching themes of freedom vs. totalitarianism, good vs. evil: “nearly every nation must choose between alternative ways of life”• What does this sound like?• Truman leaps from the local to the universal• Sec of State Dean Acheson: Domino TheoryDOMINO THEORY“like apples in a barrel infected by one rotten one, the corruption of Greece would infect Iran and all to the east.”Soviet victory of one country would inevitably be followed by an attempt to subjugate neighboring countries. In this way, countries around the USSR would fall like dominoes unless supported by the power of the US.5National Security Council Policy Paper 68 (1950)• The USSR should be understood as an expansive communistpower• The real battle is not strategic, a battle over particular places, but ideological:– Capitalism vs. communism– Freedom and democracy vs. totalitarianism• Advocated huge military build-up: 20% of GDP (what did we peak at?)• A globalist visionThe Strategic Objectives of the USSR according to NSC-681. Provide for the security of the USSR 2. Maintain East Europe and China within the Soviet Bloc3. Eliminate US influence in Eurasia and isolate the US4. Eliminate the US as a competing world power5. Spread communism throughout the worldKennan Compared to NSC-681. Geopolitical strategy a) deny the USSR key areas b) “do not give an inch” to the USSR 2. The Soviet Union as a Threata) only a threat if upsetting the balance of power in the world b) a constant military threat3. Means to be used against Soviet Communism a) focus on American economic means b) focus on American military means4. Capability of the USA to commit means a) limited b) unlimited6Kennan Compared to NSC-68 (slide 2)5. The role of diplomacy and negotiations a) important b) not important6. The role of perceptions of USA strength in Soviet foreign policy a) US military aggression will antagonize USSR b) US military aggression will intimidate USSR7. Goals of American foreign policy vs. the USSR a) act against the USSR within the framework of maintaining a power equilibrium in a world to ensure the security of the USA and the welfare of its people b) ‘frustrate the Kremlin design’ 8. The use of


View Full Document

CU-Boulder GEOG 4712 - U.S. Hegemony at End of WWII

Documents in this Course
Lecture 6

Lecture 6

12 pages

Lecture 2

Lecture 2

15 pages

Borders

Borders

7 pages

Load more
Download U.S. Hegemony at End of WWII
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view U.S. Hegemony at End of WWII and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view U.S. Hegemony at End of WWII 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?