DESIGN II, MID-SEMESTER DESIGN REVIEWThe purpose of the Design II, mid-semester presentation is to inform the audience of the progress made on design refinements from Design I, progress in formulating a comprehensive test plan for the finished product, and progress on packaging of the final product.Team: SECON Team II Reviewer: _____________ Kyle Cullen Michael Lindsey Robert Stranghoener Becky OwenAll numerical grading is on a scale of 1 (low) to 5 (high). Please make constructive comments in the space provided.Presentation Gradings (Individual)Kyle Cullen (1 to 5 score)Michael Lindsey(1 to5 score)Robert Stranghoener (1 to 5 score)Becky Owen (1 to 5 score)rbr/v0.3 1 of 3DESIGN II, MID-SEMESTER DESIGN REVIEW1. Presentation Manner (Connection with the audience, eye contact, clearly heard, fluid, no distracting mannerisms, engaging/dynamic for audience)2. Graphics, Presentation Material (professional slides, balanced high-level and technical material, used time wisely)Presentation Comments (Individual)CommentKyle CullenMichael LindseyRobert StranghoenerBecky OwenTeam: SECON Team II Reviewer: ________________Technical Gradings (entire Team)Numeric Score3. Problem lucidly stated with a clear visualization of the solution andan emphasis on the changes/refinements from Design 1; technicalspecifications listed and explained within problem context(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)Comment:4. Evidence of effective teaming in test plan formulation, designrefinement, and packaging(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)Comment:5. The presentation discusses project concerns in the following areas:Sustainability and Manufacturability(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)Comment:6. Test plan presented for testing of the final product with respect to (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)rbr/v0.3 2 of 3Reviewers: You are not expected to enter comments in all of the spaces that are provided; these spaces are provided for your convenience.DESIGN II, MID-SEMESTER DESIGN REVIEWproduct technical specifications and solution of the stated problemComment:7. Sufficient progress made in executing the design refinements/changesfrom Design 1 as supported by visual evidence and test data(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)Comment:8. Sufficient progress in packaging of final design as supported byprinted circuit board design data, housings for subsystems, etc.(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)Comment:rbr/v0.3 3 of
View Full Document