DOC PREVIEW
UCLA POLSCI 30 - Introduction to Game Trees

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

4-3-2012Lecture 1:1A certain degree of algebra is required for the course- complete the practice problem online for referenceToday we are going to work on an example problem to give you a preview of how the Political Science 30 is going to be this quarter:ex. Strategy in Campaign (US Congress: House of Representatives)- incumbency advantage- lots of fundraising especially by incumbentso huge part of their job- incumbents don’t like fundraising thougho and it seems like they don’t need to (due to incumbency advantage) →why do it then? THAT is the PUZZLE.Game Theory: Strategic Interaction 3 Aspects of what makes an interaction “strategic”1) more than 1 person with different preferences(disagreement)2) each person can affect the outcome(interdependency)3) people anticipate each other’s choices and responsesif you anticipate, then you are a strategic player(you take into account how others will react)3 Focuses in Game Theory1) Preferences: what do people want?2) Strategies: what can each person do?3) Outcomes: how do individual choices create outcome(*hardest. varies from situation to situation)Game Theory- Analysis- Communication (gives us the framework for communicating assumptions)Game Tree: sequentialdecision node: choiceRF Not branch: one option terminal nodes: 4 optionsRF Not RF Not3 decision scenarios(Inc: 1 , Chal: 2)- outcomes: connects strategies to preferences- outcomes = stakes of situation - candidates (both incumbent + challenger): want to win the election- they also don’t want to raise funds- Elements of the Outcome- want to win election (win = +7)- don’t want to raise funds (raising funds = -2)- outcomes don’t actually appear in Game Tree- counterfactuals: what could happen but doesn’t- understanding the counterfactuals is important in Game Theory because it is critical in explaining puzzles- →the prediction is explained by the counterfactualRF NotStrategic Equivalents (5, 0) (0, 5)counterfactual RF Not RF NotInc wins Inc wins Chal wins Inc wins(5, -2) (5, 0) (0, 5) (7, 0) payoffs*SET UP THE WHOLE GAME (TOP-DOWN & MAKE PAYOFFFS)BEFORE SOLVING IT (BOTTOM-UP. BECAUSE OF THE ANTICIPATED)Game Theory is good for:- those who are experts at making high stake decisions- politicians- decisions made over and over againIncChal ChalIncChal


View Full Document

UCLA POLSCI 30 - Introduction to Game Trees

Download Introduction to Game Trees
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Introduction to Game Trees and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Introduction to Game Trees 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?