DOC PREVIEW
MSU CJ 335 - LECTURE NOTES

This preview shows page 1-2 out of 5 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 5 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 5 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 5 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

11Police ProcessDae-Hoon KwakMichigan State UniversityCJ 335 Summer 20065/17/2006CJ 335 Summer 2006Lecture 2American Police History2Outline for the lecture5/17/2006CJ 335 Summer 2006• The creation and history of American policeThree Era’s/Models in Police History:1) Political Era (1600 – 1900)2) Professional/Traditional Era (late 1900 – late 1970)3) CP (or COP)/POP (1980 – present)• Comprehend the important changes that have occurred in policing• Explain both the failures and successes of reforms in policing3The Relevance of History5/17/2006CJ 335 Summer 2006• Knowledge of the development of policing contributes to our understanding of contemporary practices and problems. •Police organization, reforms, and police-community relations (PCR) today are deeply rooted in the past. • The study of police history can:- Dramatize the fact of change- Put current problems into perspective- Help us understand what reforms have worked- Alerts us to the unintended consequence of reform4The English Heritage5/17/2006CJ 335 Summer 2006• A Product of English Heritage- The English colonists brought a CJ system as part of their cultural baggage.• Three Enduring Features- Limited police authority (e.g., the Bill of Rights)- Local control of law enforcement agencies- Highly decentralized and fragmented system of Law Enforcement5The English Heritage (cont.)5/17/2006CJ 335 Summer 2006• Creation of the Modern Police- Sir Robert Peel, “the FATHER of modern policing”- Established London Metropolitan Police (1829)- Reflected vision of efficient proactive police force- Key elementsa. Mission: crime prevention (deterrence)b. Strategy: preventive patrol(of fixed beats)c. Org. Structure: quasi-military6The English Heritage (cont.)5/17/2006CJ 335 Summer 2006• Creation of the Modern Police (cont.)- The essential features of the Modern Police (Bayley)a. Public: responsible for public safetyb. Specialized: mission of law enforcement and crime preventionc. Professional: full-time, paid employees• Two primary features of the English Heritage provided to American Policing:a. Local control – not federal or State (vs. S. Korea)b. Decentralized/Fragmented System – 18,000 PDs27Example: MSU Police Dept.5/17/2006CJ 335 Summer 2006• Vision and Mission Statement- Vision Slogan: “Committed to courtesy and excellence”- Mission Statement: “The department will provide for a safe, welcome, and orderly campus environment for MSU students, faculty, staff, and visitors; and will provide an ethical, people-oriented work environment where our members may enjoy their jobs, utilize their talents, respect one another and grow as individuals.”- Focus: CP, Courtesy & Excellence, Quality Leadership, Caring Customer Service, and A People Oriented Work Place.8Example: MSU Police Dept. (cont.)5/17/2006CJ 335 Summer 2006• Vision and Mission Statement (cont.)- MSU Police 5 Big Problemsa. Police-minority trustb. Technologyc. Parking servicesd. Improving police-student relationse. Internal employee issues9Law Enforcement in Colonial America5/17/2006CJ 335 Summer 2006• Law Enforcement Institutions-Sheriff(the chief local government official) appointed by colonial governor.a. Law enforcementb. Collect taxesc. Conduct electionsd. Maintain bridges and roads-Constable(originally elected, later appointed)a. Some responsibility for enforcing law and maintaining order10Law Enforcement in Colonial America (cont.)5/17/2006CJ 335 Summer 2006• Law Enforcement Institutions (cont.)-Watch : similar to the modern-day policea. Patrolled to guard against Fire, Crime, Disorderb. Originally, only night watch (later, day watch)c. All males were expected to serve-Slave Patrol : A distinctly American form of LEa. Guard against slave revolts and capture runaway slaves.b. The first modern police forces in U.S. 11Characteristics of Colonial Law Enforcement5/17/2006CJ 335 Summer 2006•Inefficient, corrupt, and subject to political interference(no service function)• Crime Control- Little capacity to prevent crime or apprehend offenders- Reactive: did not engage in preventative patrol- Lack of personnel to investigate crime- No convenient way to report crime- Lack of communication among watch members• Order maintenance- Ill-equipped due to lack of personnel- Citizens could not readily report disturbances- Sheriff nor constable could respond effectively12Three Era’s/Models in Police History5/17/2006CJ 335 Summer 20061) Political Era (1600 – 1900)- E.g., 1830 – 1900 (Walker & Katz)1840 – 1930 (Kelling & Moore)2) Professional/Traditional Era (late 1900 – late 1970)3) CP (or COP)/POP (1980 – present)313The First Modern American Police5/17/2006CJ 335 Summer 2006• Modern forces established in 1830s and 1840s- Older system broken down due to urbanization, industrialization, and immigration (e.g., riots between ethnic groups)- Delays in creation of police forces due to memories of hated British, fear of political control, and lack of preparation to pay for public police force- Riots began to break out quite regularly in 1830s (e.g., Boston, NY, Philly)14The First Modern American Police (cont.)5/17/2006CJ 335 Summer 2006- In 1838, Boston PD – 9 P.O.s (NY created force in 1845)- First P.O.s did not carry firearms until late 1800s in respond to rising violence in cities- Just like the London model of modern policing- Main differences in US compared England.a. U.S. more democratic than Britain: citizens had direct control of governmentb. London: restraint (e.g., physical force), high personnel standards, and strict supervision = “Respect”c. U.S.: Lack of restraint, no personnel standards, and lack of supervision = “Disrespect”15American Policing (1834-1900)5/17/2006CJ 335 Summer 2006• Personnel- Non-existent standards: officers selected on political connections (e.g., patronage system)• Patrol work: was inefficient- Foot patrol: large beats, and little coverage- Lack of communication: difficult for citizens to contact police- Poor supervision• Corruption and politics- Police received payoffs for not enforcing the law- Had to pay to get promoted- Never-ending battle began for who should control PD16American Policing (1834-1900) (cont.)5/17/2006CJ 335 Summer 2006• The failure of police reform- Reformers made police corruption a major issue in 19thCen.a. Concentrated on changing structural control of PDs.b. struggle for control reflected divisions along political parties,


View Full Document

MSU CJ 335 - LECTURE NOTES

Download LECTURE NOTES
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view LECTURE NOTES and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view LECTURE NOTES 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?