DOC PREVIEW
Purdue HORT 30600 - Reading Paper

This preview shows page 1 out of 4 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 4 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 4 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

1Reading 14-1READING 14-1V.W. von Hagen 1957. The Ancient Sun Kingdoms of the Americas, The World Publishing Company, OhioAztec Milpa FieldsAztec life revolved around the milpa—the cornfi eld. And for good reason. No other civilization that has left its footsteps on the road of time has been predicated on the use of a single plant such as Indian corn (centli). Earlier than 3000 B.C., the cultures of the Middle East—Assyrian, Sumerian, Egyptian—were cultivating such leguminous plants as pulses, peas, lentils, vetches, whose high protein content made stor-age easy in semidesert lands. As for cereals such as wheat, “that most important extra-tropical grain,” [em-mer, an early wheat, has been found in Troy II (2300 B.C.)] it had been cultivated in India since Mesolithic times.”Wheat ... barley, rye, millet, panic-grass” were all part of the diet and economy of all who fl ourished in the Fertile Crescent. Yet none of these aforementioned civilizations depended solely on one plant as did those of Mexico and Yucatin.The Egyptians, to give one pertinent example, according to the Papyrus Harris (Dynasty XX, c. 1200 B.C.) knew over thirty types of bread—the Aztecs had one. The Egyptians’ diet was varied: peas, lentils, watermelons, artichokes, lettuce, endive, radishes, onions, garlic, leeks. They had fats, both vegetable and animal—the Aztecs had none. They had beef, honey, dates, as well as milk and cheese and even butter, which was unknown to the Aztecs until A.D. 1525. The stomach led in this refusal of man to accept his environment as fi xed—it is from the kitchen that so many technical operations have sprung, e.g., furnaces, ovens, preservation, fermentation, grinding techniques. Independent inventions in the kitchen can be easily discerned by comparing the Egyptian women making unleavened bread, as shown in the drawings on the wall at Thebes circa 1900 B.C., with the Aztec method of making corncakes in A.D. 1520. Corn made settled life possible in Mexico. Since these people had but one such grain, it is understand-able why it played so great a part in ritual and in practice. The origin of this grain is enveloped in botanical controversy. Although some geneticists believe that the greatest diversity of varieties comes out of Mexico, this is disputed. Paraguay is suggested as the point of dissemination by some, challenged by others. For the moment, “present evidence points to a dissemination in all directions of the early forms from an unknown center.” In the beginning of the twentieth century, it was easy to state that maize—(the Awarak-Carib name for corn)—developed out of teosinte, which was considered by most to be the ancestor of corn much as wild grass was the ancestor of wheat. Today the botanical applecart has been upset by fi ndings that point to a hybrid between a species of tripsacum and maize as the original corn, (both teosinte and tripsacum will cross with maize); and one of our great geographers who is not easily stampeded into accepting the idea of Asiatic contacts has stated—to make it still more complex—that the origin of maize “cannot even now be attributed with certainty to the New World as long as certain matters concerning Southeastern Asia remain unsolved.” Whatever the distribution centers, well-developed corncobs two inches in length have been found in graves on the desert coast of Peru, radiocarbon-dated 2500 B.C. Since one must begin at the beginning as Alice did in her Wonderland, we can begin at that date and allow those who wish to follow the maze of maize to pursue it. The starting point is in the bibliography. Milpa culture has remained unchanged for three thousand years. What is true of Aztec farming technique is true of all others in this milieu. Milpas were located two to fi fteen miles from the dwellings. If the land was forested, trees were ringed a year before and felled with ax-shaped stone celts. The bush and trees being burned, the ash was turned into the soil; larger trees were allowed to rot with time and provide humus. The earth was turned over and prepared by means of a digging stick (coa). March was the planting time. Corn kernels were placed in holes four to fi ve inches deep; in temperate zones beans and squash were put in at the same time; corn, growing faster, acted as host plant for the vines. April brought rain, and if the desired rain was withheld by the gods, sacrifi ce was made to Tlaloc, the rain god. Of the eighteen months of the Aztec year, almost every one had its ceremonies and dances connected with the growing and harvesting of corn. The corn ripened in July and there was a feast for the Goddess of Young Corn (see The Festival Days, page2 Reading 14-197). In August the rain which had been petitioned in April had to be held back; the Aztec somehow had to cajole the gods not to send rain which would spoil the harvest. So, another sacrifi ce, this time to a mature woman representing the Goddess of Ripe Corn. What did all this yield the Indian in food? The studies made among the Mayas can apply approximately to the Aztecs, even though Maya agriculture in the hotlands had slightly more yield. An acre gave twenty bushels of husked corn, a bushel being fi fty-six pounds, which, fortuitously, coincides with a “cargo,” of what a man could carry on his back. The average size of a milpa in Yucatán was ten acres; it would have been slightly less in the land-hungry Aztec territory. This gave an Aztec family a yield of two hundred bushels of corn yearly, or 11,200 pounds. To fell, plant, weed, and harvest this land with the aid of his wife and, say, four half-grown children, the Aztec farmer would have to expend about two hundred days. In the same fi eld he would also plant beans, squash, pump kins, adding to the yield of the fi eld and also to be included in the produce of these two hundred days. Now since the average consumption of corn for tortillas is one and a half pounds a person a day, the family consumed only one third of what it produced, or 3,380 pounds’ consumption a year as against 11,200 of yield, allowing a surplus for barter, trade, work taxes, and religious taxes. With a surplus of 165 unused days unless he was called to battle, the Aztec could use these in his particular craft, making grass mats, fi ber sandals, canoes, weapons, etc. These he bartered for needed things at the markets. Corn was the “basic.” What else? Beans


View Full Document

Purdue HORT 30600 - Reading Paper

Documents in this Course
Pliny

Pliny

2 pages

Reading

Reading

2 pages

Reading

Reading

4 pages

Reading

Reading

2 pages

Lecture 5

Lecture 5

14 pages

Load more
Download Reading Paper
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Reading Paper and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Reading Paper 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?