DOC PREVIEW
UT EE 381K - Image Restoration

This preview shows page 1-2-3-4-5-6 out of 17 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 17 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 17 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 17 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 17 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 17 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 17 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 17 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

&RS\ULJKW   'DOH &DUQHJLH  $VVRFLDWHV ,QFImage RestorationHung-Ta PaiLaboratory for Image and Video EngineeringDept. of Electrical and Computer EngineeringThe University of Texas at AustinAustin, TX 78712-1084Degradation Model■ In noise-free cases, a blurred image canbe modeled asimage original:xfunction blur invariant-space linear : hh x y ∗=■ In the DFT domain, Y(u,v) = X(u,v) H(u,v)Inverse Filtering■ Assume h is known (low-pass filter)■ Inverse filter G(u,v) = 1 / H(u,v)■v)G(u, v)Y(u,v)(u,X =~Implementing Inverse FilteringLost InformationProblems with Inverse Filtering■ H(u,v) = 0, for some u, vnoise additive :nnhxy+∗=■ In noisy case,■ Least Mean Square Filter Wiener Filter Formulation[]v)(u,v)/S(u,Sv)H(u,v)(u,H v)G(u,xn2*+=■ In practice Kv)H(u,v)(u,H v)G(u,*+=2Wiener Filter ResultsMaximum-Likelihood (ML)Estimation■ h is unknown )}|p(y maxarg{ mlθθθ=■ Solution is difficult■ Parametric set θ is estimated by■ Assume parametric models for the blurfunction, original image, and/or noiseExpectation-Maximization (EM)Algorithm■ Find complete set Ζ: for z ∈ Ζ, f(z)=y■ Expectation-step■ Choose an initial guess of θ■ Maximization-step]y,|)|[p(z)|(kkθθθθEg=)|( max argkθθθθg=+1kSubspace Methods=43210210210210210432321210aaaaa bbb000bbb000bbbbbb aaaaaaaaa■ ObserveSubspace Methods■ Several blurred versions of originalimage are available■ Construct a block Hankel matrix Χ of blurredimages■Χ = Η Σ, where Η is a block Toeplitzmatrix of the blur functions and Σ is ablock Hankel matrix of the original imageSubspace Methods ResultsConclusions■ Noise-free case: inverse filtering■ Multichannel blind case: subspacemethods■ Blind case: Maximum-Likelihoodapproach using the Expectation-Maximization algorithm■ Noisy case: Weiner filterFurther Reading■ M. R. Banham and A. K. Katsaggelos"Digital Image Restoration, " IEEESignal Processing Magazine, vol. 14,no. 2, Mar. 1997, pp. 24-41.■ D. Kundur and D. Hatzinakos, "BlindImage Deconvolution," IEEE SignalProcessing Magazine, vol. 13, no. 3,May 1996, pp.


View Full Document

UT EE 381K - Image Restoration

Documents in this Course
Load more
Download Image Restoration
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Image Restoration and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Image Restoration 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?