Unformatted text preview:

1 Recitations 2 & 3 . February 12 & 19, 2010 Regulation of the US power sector Prof. Ignacio J. Pérez-Arriaga Engineering, Economics & Regulation of the Electric Power Sector ESD.934, 6.974 2 Source: Andy Whitaker2 North American Organized Markets Roughly half the installed capacity Geographic footprint of organized wholesale markets in North America Source: ISO 5 The electricity crisis of California Lack of generation • Regulatory uncertainty (responsibility not clear) • No regulatory instruments to ensure enough firm capacity • Administrative difficulties • Low hydraulicity • Climate • High Demand • High prices • Rationing • Market design & structure • Lack of demand response • Natural Gas • NOx • Risk allocation (CTC, contracts) Bankruptcy • SDG & E • PG & E, SCE © ISO / RTO Council. ll rights reserved. This content is excluded from our Creative Commons license. For more information, see http://ocw.mit.edu/fairuse..4 2000-01 Crisis Source; Gary Stern, Southern California Edison Company 8 There are other explanations... “The California crunch really is the result of not enough power-generating plants and then not enough power to power the power of generating plants” George.W. Bush (then President elect) (Interview by the New York Times, January 14, 2001) 300250200150100500JulAprJanJanOctOctJulJulAprAprJanOctJulAprJanOctJulAprJanOctJulApr200320022001200019991998Wholesale electricity prices in California, $MWh$MWhPX Terminated Day-Ahead Trading January 31, 2001 Feb. 2002 - Sep. 2002, Bloomberg SP15 Average Price are Shown Image by MIT OpenCourseWare.5 Regulatory U-Turn  2007 Nationwide survey confirmed dramatic reversal of support among state utility regulators for “deregulated” energy markets  One third of regulators in currently competitive states said they are seriously considering “re-regulating” utilities in their jurisdictions! Asked to identify states operating most successful deregulated energy markets, majority of commissioners replied, "None"  Survey found no measurable support among state regulators for any form of retail competition in foreseeable future RKS Research & Consulting, 2007 10 The “textbook model” of the restructured & liberalized power sector Some material for this section has been borrowed from S. Littlechild & P. Joskow in Electricity Market reform: An international perspective, Elsevier, 2006.6 11 Components of the “textbook model” (the 10 commandments)  Privatization, to enhance performance & reduce the interference of the government  Vertical separation of competitive & regulated monopoly activities  Horizontal restructuring to create a level playing field for competition  Independent System Operator  Voluntary energy & ancillary services markets & trading arrangements 12 Components of the “textbook model” (the 10 commandments) (continuation)  Open access to the transmission network, plus adequate locational signals  Free choice of supplier with an adequate design & utilization of retail tariffs  Creation of independent regulatory agencies  Provision of transition mechanisms  … & nothing more!7 13 The standard structure of full fledged electricity markets Generator Power Exchange Supplier Consumer in the market Generator Generator Distributor/ Retailer Consumer at a regulated tariff Supplier Distributor/ Retailer Consumer in the market Consumer at a regulated tariff Wholesale market Retail market 14 … however, avoid “cut & paste”  Models which appear to work well in some circumstances & places may not be easily transferable to countries facing different circumstances (peak load, level of development, industry initial structure & ownership, fuel mix, interconnections, institutional framework)8 15 Successes…  Where the textbook model has been basically followed the new regulation has been quite successful  Nordic countries  UK  Argentina (before the country’s financial crisis)  Texas & Northeast of the US  Australia 16 … & failures  And where the textbook model has been abandoned because of omission or commission, there have been problems  Omission: France (no comprehensive wholesale market), Germany (lack of true open network access), New Zealand (no independent regulator), …  Commission: California (poor assignment of risk), Chile (pioneer but too restrictive market & transmission rules), Spain (too much governmental intervention & horizontal concentration), …9 17 Most frequent failures “When structure is not conducive to competition, the regulator & pool operator will find themselves unsuccessfully chasing after conduct. The solution is not a better rule, but a change in structure”(*) (or a gradual introduction of competition, with rules that restrict the freedom of the market agents & prevent market power abuse) (*) From “Governance & regulation of power pools & system operators”, Barker, J., Tenenbaum, B. & Woolf, F., World Bank, 1997.10 19 Frequent failures  Inadequate sector structure for competition  Horizontal concentration  Insufficient vertical / diagonal unbundling  Generation & system operation  Distribution & retailing  Generation & retailing (¿?)  Incorrect risk allocation in the regulatory design  Default tariff design (pass through of costs to consumers)  Authorized trading instruments  Ultimate responsibility to supply 20 Frequent failures (continuation)  Attempting to apply “textbook-like reforms” in countries without an appropriate power sector structure &/or an adequate institutional framework  No liquid &/or supra-national balancing markets  Insufficient competition in the markets for fuel11 21 Frequent failures (continuation)  Absence of executive regional institutions in supra-national markets  Lack of needed harmonization  Inadequate cross-border trading rules  Scarce available commercial capacity of interconnectors  Physical capacity / long-term previous contracts 22 Model 1: Monopoly Generation Transmission Distribution/ Retail Consumers Generation Transmission Distribution/ Retail Consumers12 23 Model 2: Purchasing agency (single buyer) IPP Single buyer Distribution/ Retailer Consumer IPP IPP Distribution/ Retailer Consumer IPP Single


View Full Document

MIT ESD 934 - Regulation of the US power sector

Download Regulation of the US power sector
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Regulation of the US power sector and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Regulation of the US power sector 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?