DOC PREVIEW
UConn COMM 1000 - Communative Goals

This preview shows page 1 out of 3 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Lecture 3Outline of last lecturel. Definition of communicationll. Transactional Modellll. Levels of CommunicationOutline of Current lecture lV. Communative Goals V. Studying communication as a scienceVl. Major research design Current lecturelV. Communative goals A. Understanding - Accurate reception of the intended content- Primary failure: Failure to achieve content accuracy- Understanding gets more difficult as you add more peopleB. Pleasure - Communicating with others in a way that enhance sense of mutual well-being - Sometimes referred to “phatic communication”- Maintaining human contact.- Closely related to our feelings about those with whom we are interacting.C. Attitude Influence - Process of changing and reformulating attitudes- Important across all communication levels- “Persuasion”D. Improved Relationships- Secondary failure in human communication- Disturbance in human relationships that result from misunderstanding - Cause friction, anger or confusion- Discerning motivation is difficultE. Action- Arguably the most difficult outcome to produce- Especially difficult in- Organizational - And mass communication settingsV. Studying Communication as a science A. Communication as a field - Public speaking (rooted in classical Rhetoric)- Interpretivists- Take a unique event and very thoroughly seek understanding COMM1000 1st Edition- Critical scholars - In Communication and other fields- Seek to understand the power in any given situation B. Social scientific approaches/ two basic Flavors- Qualitative social scientists - Employ rigorous observational rules- Work “in the field”- Collect data that are descriptive, rich detailEx. In-depth interviews, ethnography- Quantitative social scientists - Work in the field or in the lab- Employ advanced statistical techniques to uncover patterns C. The Scientific Method is- Empirical- Carefully observe and measure- Objective- Aim is to remove bias- Use set of rules and procedures- Logical - Inferences from data are consistent and rational - Public- Findings reported to scientific community Vl. Major Research Designs A. Example: Studying touch - Researchers might ask:- How do individuals enact public touch - How does touch communication vary culturally - What do people think about touch?- What are the effects of touch in relationships?B. Content Analysis - Definition: systematic analysis of content of communication messages- Purpose : Describe touch type (or frequency) content - E.g. How much touch occurs? Compare content across various locations- How does touch behavior differ from country to country? Assess image of particular group- Are far eastern cultures really low-touch?C. Issues to consider- Need representative sample- Which groups of individuals to observe?- How many of each- Need clear, specific definitions COMM1000 1st Edition- What counts as touch?- What if it is an extended touch - Limitations- Can only study material as it occurs (no manipulation)- No information about effectsD. Survey Research- Examines what people think or do - Relies mainly on self-reports- Examples- Relationship questionnaires- Election- Attitude surveysE. Issues to consider - Need representative sample- Need good questions- Goals:- Attitudes/behaviors in population- Relationship between variables F. Limitations of surveys- No control- Cannot make causal conclusion- Only relationships between variables G. Experimental Research- Manipulation of variable(s)- One group gets treatment, other does not- Control of other variables- Measure effect/outcomeH. Issues to consider - Goal: Draw causal conclusions - Independent variable -> dependent variable - Need random assignment - Randomly divide participants into groups I. Limitations of Experiments- Hard to generalize beyond subjects and lab environment - Artificial setting- Limited subject populationCOMM1000 1st


View Full Document

UConn COMM 1000 - Communative Goals

Download Communative Goals
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Communative Goals and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Communative Goals 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?