Unformatted text preview:

1 For for 17.871 Prof. Gabriel S. Lenz Political Science Laboratory Department of Political Science MIT Office: E53-463 M, W, 3-4:30 Phone: 253-6959 E53-220 e-mail: [email protected] Spring 2007 URL:http://www.mit.edu/~17.871/ TA: Christopher Wendt e-mail: [email protected] NOTE: Because this subject is labor-intensive and has presentation requirements, there will be enrollment limitations. See below for the priority system to be used if necessary. The prerequisite (17.869) is strictly enforced. Purpose The purpose of this class is to introduce undergraduate political scientists to the basic quantitative tools of political science research. In particular, this class explores the key statistically-based research tools that social scientists use to frame and answer empirical questions. When you finish this subject successfully, you will be able to conduct quantitative research, be better able to read critically much of the professional literature in political science and other statistically-based fields, and have an employable skill. The most important purpose behind the political science laboratory, however, is to help you move from being a passive reader of social scientific tomes to being a creative producer of new insights. Producing new knowledge, or systematically probing someone else's claims, can be a lot of fun. In order to get to the fun, there is a lot of stuff we have to consider. Consequently, this subject runs on three (roughly) parallel tracks. Leaving on Track 1 is statistics. Statistical reasoning is the most important method of testing hypotheses in the social sciences. Therefore, the statistical introduction offered here forms the core of the subject. The approach I will take to statistics is informal and intuitive. The approach could be more formal and less intuitive, but that would leave us with less time to get on to the new knowledge part. If this subject piques your interest in statistical methods, or if you want a more rigorous treatment of the statistical topics addressed here, consider taking 17.846 (Multivariate Political Analysis), 14.31 (Econometrics), or 6.430J (Engineering Probability and Statistics). Leaving on Track 2 are research mechanics. Serious scholarship requires hard work, organization, and attention to detail. Lots of people have lots of interesting ideas about how the social world works. Some of these ideas are right, others, nuts. In the long run the researchers who are taken the most seriously and who make the biggest contributions are the ones who get down and dirty with the data. And doing good empirical research involves knowing how libraries work, how to convince people to be interviewed by you, how to type numbers into a computer, how to write code in monster statistical packages, and how to craft a clear English-language sentence. We will therefore spend a good amount of time with the mundane tasks of learning how to use one statistical package2 (called STATA) and learning how to write papers that follow a specific style book (Turabian's Manual for Writers of Term Papers, Theses, and Dissertations). Leaving on Track 3 is a project of your own making. There is an old Chinese proverb that says, "I hear and I forget; I see and I remember; I do and I understand." It is this philosophy that drives the Institute's lab requirement, and it is the philosophy that drives this subject. You will be responsible for finding a question that interests you and applying the skills you're learning in this subject toward learning (and understanding) something new. This is the most interesting part of this subject. It can be fun, but it's also much more difficult than it first appears. Because doing original research is so hard, I am firmly enforcing the prerequisite (17.869). You need to have a good understanding about what political science is and what political scientists do before taking this class. Otherwise, I can guarantee that you will be totally at sea the last half of the semester. Subject organization We will meet twice each week. During the first half of the semester the primary purpose of these meetings will be to review materials in two formats: lecture and discussion. The subject schedule that begins on page 4 delineates what will happen each class meeting. I expect you to be prepared for each class. Preparation will involve different things, depending on what we will be doing in that meeting. During some meetings I will be presenting material from one of the textbooks. For those, you will be expected to have done the textbook reading before the class. I will pay attention to who seems prepared and who is not. If you are unprepared for a particular class meeting, come to class any way, because I will grade down people who are regularly absent. During the second half of the semester we will meet twice each week to talk about your research projects. You will be required to make two class presentations during this period. At the first presentation, you will be responsible for introducing the class to the problem you wish to address, how you plan to address it, and your preliminary findings. At the second presentation you will be responsible for presenting your findings. These will be brief presentations, probably no more than 10-15 minutes apiece. Because you will be graded on these presentations, you should practice them beforehand. Subject requirements 1. Class attendance and discussion of assigned readings. (20% of grade) See the comments in the first paragraph of the section on Subject Organization. Come to all the regularly-scheduled class meetings. We may hold ad hoc review and workshop sessions during the term, which are optional. Attending the oral presentations that your colleagues give about their research is not optional; your constructive participation in these sessions from the perspective of the audience will be a major aspect of this part of the grade. 2. Data analysis exams and problem sets. (20% of grade) There will be two short (30-minute), in-class exams, that cover material from the text book, along with three take-home exercises. These are intended to make sure you have been serious about mastering the most basic technical and mechanical aspects of conducting quantitative research.3 3. Group project. (20% of grade) There will be a group project assigned the first month of the semester, to give you a short introduction to doing quantitative social science research. The final product of each project


View Full Document

MIT 17 871 - SYLLABUS

Documents in this Course
Load more
Download SYLLABUS
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view SYLLABUS and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view SYLLABUS 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?