DOC PREVIEW
MIT ESD 71 - INVESTING IN HUMAN CAPITAL

This preview shows page 1-2-3-4 out of 12 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 12 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 12 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 12 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 12 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 12 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

INVESTING IN HUMAN CAPITALPREAMBLETHE CASE OF AUTOMANUFACTURINGDESIGN LEVERS FOR ANALYSISUNCERTAINTY FACTORSCOMPARING TWO DESIGNSDECISION ANALYSIS: SETUPDECISION ANALYSIS: RESULTSBINOMIAL LATTICE ANALYSIS: SETUPBINOMIAL LATTICE ANALYSIS: RESULTSSlide 11DISCUSSIONInvesting in Human Capital 1INVESTING IN HUMAN CAPITALESD.71 Final Application Portfolio PresentationDecember 6, 2007Marie-Claude NadeauInvesting in Human Capital 2PREAMBLEIn a number of industries, quality of the workforce is a key factor in determining a product’s position in the marketInvesting in human capital earlier in a product’s lifetime may yield higher future revenuesThis effect becomes even more significant as competition for skilled workforce becomes stronger and wages increaseInvesting in Human Capital 3THE CASE OF AUTOMANUFACTURINGThe car manufacturing industry is no exception to these trendsSeeing an increase of knowledge intensity in both product and workforceThis poses the problem of decision-making in a context where workforce size and experience has an overall impact on product quality and thus, potential market shareInvesting in Human Capital 4DESIGN LEVERS FOR ANALYSISThe performance of the system analyzed can be improved by changing:Number of workers hiredPeriod when they are hiredHiring an employee has both a one-time initial cost, and a cost per period (wages)In addition, initial plant size can be varied, for more or less economies of scaleCan build more capacity than workforce can currently produce → flexibility to hire and augment production in the futureInvesting in Human Capital 5UNCERTAINTY FACTORSTwo main sources of uncertainty:Future demand for the productWorkers’ wagesThis changes in both these parameters could occur because of technical innovation, environmental regulation, labour regulations, etc.The analysis presented will focus on uncertainty in future demand, but similar methods could be applied for other factorsInvesting in Human Capital 6COMPARING TWO DESIGNSFixed workforce strategy:Fixed number of workers, all hired at year 0Plant size corresponding to production capacity of these workersFlexible workforce strategyFewer workers hired at year 0, with possibility to hire more laterLarger plant built initially to have the flexibility of increasing production laterInvesting in Human Capital 7DECISION ANALYSIS: SETUPTwo stages of five yearsAt each chance node:Demand assumed to follow a geometric Brownian motion with average growth rate 1.7%, volatility 2%Two stages are simulated 2000 times and bucketed in “high”, “medium” or “low” outcomesAt each decision node, there is a choice between hiring more workers or notExpected value is calculated after each nodeInvesting in Human Capital 8DECISION ANALYSIS: RESULTSValue higher for the fixed plan ($1.3G) than for the flexible plan ($1.2G), but flexible plan better under “maximin” objectiveInvesting in Human Capital 9BINOMIAL LATTICE ANALYSIS: SETUPDemand has average growth rate 1.7%, volatility 5%, over 6 yearsLattice parameters:u=1.0512711 d=0.9512294 p=0.67Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 6Outcomes: 1860.00 1955.36 2055.62 2161 .01 2271.81 2388.29 2510.74 1769.29 1860.00 1955 .36 2055.62 2161.01 2271.81 1683.00 1769 .29 1860.00 1955.36 2055.62 1600.92 1683.00 1769.29 1860 .00 1522.84 1600.92 1683 .00 1448.57 1522 .84       1377.92Investing in Human Capital 10BINOMIAL LATTICE ANALYSIS: RESULTSProbability distribution function:Investing in Human Capital 11BINOMIAL LATTICE ANALYSIS: RESULTSDecision to exercise flexibility:Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 YES YES YES YES YES YES NO NO YES YES YES YES NO NO YES YES YES NO NO YES YES NO YES YES NO YES       NOExpected present value of flexible design ($2.18G) is higher than for fixed design ($1.99G)Value of flexibility is $192MInvesting in Human Capital 12DISCUSSIONValue of flexibility depends on a number of analysis parameters: method, objective, definition of uncertainty, discount rate, project lifetimeDecision analysis may be more appropriate for options on building a plant, and lattice for options on hiring workforceProblem can scale rapidly with added uncertainty


View Full Document

MIT ESD 71 - INVESTING IN HUMAN CAPITAL

Documents in this Course
Load more
Download INVESTING IN HUMAN CAPITAL
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view INVESTING IN HUMAN CAPITAL and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view INVESTING IN HUMAN CAPITAL 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?