DOC PREVIEW
Stanford MATH 220 - Lecture Notes

This preview shows page 1 out of 3 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Comments on Rayleigh-Ritz Approximation and MinimaxPrincipleLet {w1, . . . , wn} be n linearly independent trial functions. Let A = (ajk), B = (bjk)where ajk= h∇wj, ∇wki and bjk= hwj, wki. Consider the equationdet(A − λB) = 0.Assume λ∗1, . . . , λ∗nare the n real roots of this equation. We know that there exists a set ofvectors {vj} which form a basis for Rnsuch thatAvj= λ∗jBvjj = 1, . . . , nand the {vj} are mutually orthogonal with respect to B; that is,Bvj· vi= 0 i 6= j.LetXi≡ span{v1, . . . vi}.Lemma 1. For {w1, . . . , wn} a set of linearly independent trial functions and A, B, {vj}defined as above, the ithroot of the equation det(A − λB) = 0 satisfiesλ∗i= maxc∈Xi,c6=0Ac · cBc · cProof. First, we note thatλ∗i=Avi· viBvi· vi≤ maxc∈XiAc · cBc · c.Next, let c ∈ Xi. Then c =Pij=1cjvj. Therefore,Ac · cBc · c=APij=1cjvj·Pij=1cjvjBPij=1cjvj·Pij=1cjvj=Pij=1cjλ∗jBvj·Pij=1cjvjPij=1c2jBvj· vj=Pij=1c2jλ∗jBvj· vjPij=1c2jBvj· vj≤ λ∗i.Therefore, taking the maximum of both sides over all possible c ∈ Xi, we get the desiredresult. ¤1Remark. Using the fact thatAc · cBc · c=||∇(Pnj=1cjwj)||2L2||Pnj=1cjwj||2L2,we haveλ∗i= maxc∈Xi,c6=0(||∇(Pnj=1cjwj)||2L2||Pnj=1cjwj||2L2).Lemma 2. The ithDirichlet eigenvalue is given byλi= min maxc∈Xi,c6=0(||∇(Pnj=1cjwj)||2L2||Pnj=1cjwj||2L2)where the minimum is taken over all possible sets of linearly independent functions {w1, . . . , wn}.Remark: From the above remark, we see thatλi= min λ∗i(w1, . . . , wn)where the minimum is taken over all possible sets of linearly independent trial functions.Proof. Fix { w1, . . . , wn}. Choose a linear combination w =Pnj=1cjwjsuch that• c = (c1, . . . , cn) ∈ Xi• w is orthogonal to the first i − 1 eigenfunctions (denoted ui).The first condition impliesc · Bvj= 0 j = i + 1, . . . , n.The second condition implieshw, uji = 0 j = 1, . . . , i − 1.In particular, we have n − 1 equations for our n unknowns c1, . . . , cn. Therefore, such afunction exists.By the Minimum Principle for the itheigenvalue, we haveλi≤||∇w||2L2||w||2L2≤ maxc∈Xi||∇(Pnj=1cjwj)||2L2||Pnj=1cjwj||2L2.Taking the minimum of both sides over all possible sets of linearly independent trialfunctions, we conclude thatλi≤ min maxc∈Xi,c6=0||∇(Pnj=1cjwj)||2L2||Pnj=1cjwj||2L2.2Next, let {w1, . . . , wn} be the first n eigenfunctions. Thenmaxc∈Xi||∇(Pnj=1cjwj)||2L2||Pnj=1cjwj||2L2=||∇wi||2L2||wi||2L2= λi.Therefore,min maxc∈Xi||∇(Pnj=1cjwj)||2L2||Pnj=1cjwj||2L2≤ λi.Consequently, we get the desired result.


View Full Document

Stanford MATH 220 - Lecture Notes

Documents in this Course
Load more
Download Lecture Notes
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Lecture Notes and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Lecture Notes 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?