Unformatted text preview:

PUBLIC RELATIONS LECTURE12/2/99Description of the Major distinguishable publics of a Park and RecreationAgencyInput PublicsSupport Publics - determine allocation of dollars for the facility. They may include: legislators; city council; board of commissioners; foundations; individual or corporate donors; volunteer groups; "friends of the parks" groups; local financial institutions who may be prepared to support revenue bond issues for particular facilities.Benefits they may seek:- the satisfaction of contributing to the quality of life in the community by allocating resources to the agency- meeting commitments which they made to electors/constituentswhen they were placed in this role of resource provider- public relations- increase their own personal stature in the community through having been prominently associated with the project when it reaches fruitionSupplier Publics - contractors sales representatives, equipment suppliers, consultants' services, landowners, transportation services, concessionaire operators.Benefits they may seek:- opportunities to sell their products/services- contribute to an improvement in the quality of their community's lifeEmployee Publics - the agency's own employees, on whose commitment, skill, and enthusiasm the agency will ultimately be judged.- enhancement of job security- increased job satisfaction derived from providing improved client servicesFigure 16-7. The possible reaction of different publics to a proposed new recreation or park facility.Output PublicsAgent Publics - people or organizations perceived to be acting on behalf of the recreation and parks agency, for example, individual commissioners, advisory commissions, themass media, "friends of the parks" groups. Often the agent publics may also serve as partof the Support Group Constituency.Benefits they may seek:- same as those of Support PublicsConsumer Publics - those who directly benefit from the services to be delivered. They may also be termed client publics.Benefits they may seek:- the services which they directly receiveSanctioning PublicsGeneral Public - consists of nonusers as well as users. They provide the tax support base either directly through their vote in bond referendums (in which case they should be viewed as a Support Public) or through more indirect influence on their elected representatives.- development of amenities is evidence of the agency's contribution to the general well-being of the community.- non-users benefit indirectly from development of facilities suchas parks, since they are a common good in which all share because they lead to an upgrading in the quality of the community.- there is psychological benefit from knowing a service is available even if it is never used by an individual.Competitor Publics - the major competitor publics can be readily identified by reference to Figure 3-3 in chapter 3. At the local level, a program may be in direct competition with those at state and federal levels, as well as with competitors in the non-public, home recreation and tourism sectors. Emphasis here is likely to be upon securing passive acceptance rather than upon positive support.Benefits they may seek:- compatibility of the program with their own operation; emphasis on the complementary rather than the competitive elements of the project.- if competitors are seeking only passive acceptance, the agency need only emphasize how it will not hurt them rather than what benefits it will bring tothem.Special Publics - examples would be special interest groups such as conservation organizations, handicapped groups, minority groups, juvenile delinquents, impacted landowners, or residents.Benefits they may seek (for example, a handicapped group):- how it will serve needs of the handicapped- particular features incorporated to accommodate the handicapped- opportunities for interaction with other groups in the communityGovernment Publics - permit or grant providing agencies; cooperating agencies, e.g., school board.Benefits they may seek:- a superior project which the granting agency can be assured is likely to be successful- a non-controversial project which is unlikely to subject the cooperating agency to public criticism- provide the agency with credits and publicity- save expenditures by jointly sharing costs of development and operationThis generalized example is only illustrative. The particular benefits which constituents in each of the nine publics will seek in exchange for their support will vary according to the composition of the constituent group and the specific nature of the project for which their support is being sought.The example has used a proposed facility for the purposes of illustration. However the framework of publics would be equally appropriate for a program, event or service.(Howard & Crompton,


View Full Document

MSU PRR 370 - PUBLIC RELATIONS LECTURE

Download PUBLIC RELATIONS LECTURE
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view PUBLIC RELATIONS LECTURE and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view PUBLIC RELATIONS LECTURE 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?