DOC PREVIEW
Rutgers University CS 417 - Network Quality of Service

This preview shows page 1-2-3-18-19-37-38-39 out of 39 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 39 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 39 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 39 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 39 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 39 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 39 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 39 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 39 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 39 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Distributed Systems 3. Network Quality of Service (QoS) Paul Krzyzanowski [email protected] 1 10/1/2012 © 2012 Paul KrzyzanowskiWhat factors matter for network performance? • Bandwidth (bit rate) – Average number of bits per second through the network • Delay (latency) – Average time for data to get from one endpoint to its destination • Jitter – Variation in end-to-end delay • Loss (packet errors and dropped packets) – Percentage of packets that don’t reach their destination 2 10/1/2012 © 2012 Paul KrzyzanowskiWhy do we care? • We want to provide users with – Good interactive performance – Glitch-free, delay-free streaming video – Good quality IP telephony 3 10/1/2012 © 2012 Paul KrzyzanowskiQuality of Service Goals • Provide applications with the data flow performance they need: – Bandwidth, delay, jitter, loss • Examples – VoIP: low bandwidth, low latency (<150 ms), low jitter (<30 ms) – Video streaming: high bandwidth, longer latency OK – Remote login: low bandwidth, relatively low latency, high reliability – File transfer: high bandwidth, high latency OK, high jitter OK , high reliability 4 10/1/2012 © 2012 Paul KrzyzanowskiWhy do we have QoS problems? • We don’t have unlimited resources! – On-host resources • Multiple processes may want to send packets – Network • Available bandwidth • Bandwidth mismatch – Network routing & switching • Processing delays • Buffer space in routers & switches – Too many queued packets → queue overflow & dropped packets → congestion • Address quality of service with resource allocation & prioritization 5 10/1/2012 © 2012 Paul KrzyzanowskiContributors to congestion Bandwidth mismatch Aggregation Extra traffic resulting from – Faulty hardware/firmware – Excess retransmission from data corruption – High-traffic apps or misbehaving hosts (e.g., malware generating floods) Congestion leads to packet loss 10 Gbps 50 Mbps 1 Gbps 1 Gbps 6 10/1/2012 © 2012 Paul KrzyzanowskiContributors to latency • Packetization on host – Create IP & MAC packets • Serialization – Send data onto the network – One packet at a time – others are queued • Propagation delay • Processing delay on routers – Input queue → output queue and packet inspection • Queuing delay – Wait for interface to be available 7 10/1/2012 © 2012 Paul KrzyzanowskiContributors to jitter • Packets arrive at a router or switch at the same time – Used to lead to collision on a shared link – Buffers store packets – Transmitted FIFO, not all at once! – Dequeuing creates jitter • Dynamic re-routing • Transport layer – Caching out of order packets → delayed delivery • Out-of-order packets need to be buffered • May need to be retransmitted – Retransmission • Transport-layer retransmission • End-to-end (huge!) jitter FIFO output queue 8 10/1/2012 © 2012 Paul KrzyzanowskiContributors to packet loss • Buffer overrun on routers/switches (queue full) • Bad transmission lines (e.g., signal degradation & noise) • Faulty hardware 9 10/1/2012 © 2012 Paul KrzyzanowskiQoS Aware Networks • A QoS-aware network will allow an application to specify its needs and will reserve sufficient capacity in the network to meet those goals • Admission Control – Applications request a particular quality of service from the network – If the request is granted, the application has the contract • Traffic Control – Classifies, queues, and schedules traffic within the network 10 10/1/2012 © 2012 Paul KrzyzanowskiService Models for QoS • No QoS (best effort) – Default behavior for IP with no QoS – No preferential treatment – Host is not involved in specifying service quality needs • Soft QoS (Differentiated Services) – No explicit setup – Identify one type of service (data flow) vs. another – Certain classes get preferential treatment over others • Hard QoS – Network makes commitment to deliver the required quality of service – Host makes a reservation • Traffic flows are reserved 11 10/1/2012 © 2012 Paul KrzyzanowskiApproaches to Network Resource Allocation • Router-based vs. Host-based – Router-based • Each router decides which packet to forward & when – Host-based • Each host observes network conditions and adjusts its behavior • Reservation vs. feedback-based – Reservation-based • Host asks for specific capacity from the network • Each router allocates buffer space for that flow to satisfy the request. • If a router cannot grant, reservation is denied – Feedback-based • Hosts sends data without reserving resources • Host gets congestion feedback from a router or detects packet loss & adjusts its transmission rate 12 10/1/2012 © 2012 Paul KrzyzanowskiCongestion Control • Congestion: – Caused by more incoming traffic than we can route • Three approaches – Admission control (input) • Prevent congestion that has been detected from getting worse • Do not allow packets for a specific flow, new flows, new virtual circuits – Choke packets (feedback) – Queue management (output) 13 10/1/2012 © 2012 Paul KrzyzanowskiCongestion Control: Choke Packets • If a router determines congestion, send back a “choke packet” – Packet contains destination address identifying the port that is congested – This is a request from the router not to send packets to that destination (voluntary) • IP handles congestion by dropping packets • Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) allows end-to-end notification of congestion (RFC 3168) 14 10/1/2012 © 2012 Paul KrzyzanowskiControlling Jitter • Multiple queues per output port • Queue based on priority • Each packet is assigned to a queue – Layer 2: 802.1p priority bits, MPLS EXP field – Layer 3: IP ToS bits, protocol type, source/destination address – Layer 4: port numbers – Any combinations output queues Classifier Scheduler Incoming packet Transmitted packet 15 10/1/2012 © 2012 Paul KrzyzanowskiControlling Jitter: scheduling packets • Simplest was a single FIFO queue • Round robin from multiple queues – Each class of service gets a fair share – not what we want • Priority – If there are always packets in a high priority queue, we get head of line blocking (simply packets holding up other packets) • Weighted Fair Queuing (WFQ) – Each queue gets a priority and a minimum % of link speed output queues Classifier Scheduler Incoming


View Full Document

Rutgers University CS 417 - Network Quality of Service

Download Network Quality of Service
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Network Quality of Service and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Network Quality of Service 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?