Unformatted text preview:

1Patents ' 101Rii,a'Ka.la,'Stan f ordDavid'Hsu,'Wh arton23Patents:'The'Basic'Facts• What'is ' patentab le?1.'Non‐obviou s• To'someone'in'the'field'(US),'or'inven.ve'(Europe)2.'Novel• Beyond'what'is'already'known/invented3.'Useful• To'anyone'(US),'to'industrial'user'(Europe)4.'Patentable• Not:'Laws'of'nature'(gravity),'natural'phenomena'(flora),abstract'ideas'(love)…5.'First'to:'invent'(US)'or'file'(Europe)4Patents:'The'Basic'Facts• Paten.ng'costs'approx.'$25,000'per'patent' (Lemley,'2000)5Patents:'The'Basic'Facts• Paten.ng'costs'approx.'$25,000'per'patent' (Lemley,'2000)Source: IFI, 2007 top-ranked US patent winners (awarded U.S. patents)6Patents:'The'Basic'Facts• Paten.ng'costs'approx.'$25,000'per'patent' (Lemley,'2000)• Inven.on'is'disclosed'publicly– Both'U.S.'applica.ons'(since'2001)'and'granted'patents'(since'1790)publicly'available• But…i n'return…Temporary'monopoly– Right'to'exclude'others'from'making,'using,'and'selling'the'inven.on78Patents:'The'Basic'Facts• Paten.ng'costs'approx.'$25,000'per'patent' (Lemley,'2000)• Inven.on'is'disclosed'publicly• Temporary'monopoly:– Right'to'exclude'others'from'making,'using,'and'selling'the'inven.on– For'20'years'from'the'date'of'applica.on• …'should'provide'an'incen.ve'to'innovate• …'creates'a'market'for'innova.on'(through'licensing)9Issue dateTitle Keywords: Tech DescriptionOther Cites:Science/KnowledgeCharacteristicsInventor, Assignee: OwnershipPatent Class: Tech ClassificationAbstract: Tech DescriptionClaims: Coverage of patentExaminer & Attorney /Law FirmA BETTERMOUSETRAPPatent Cites: “Prior Art”Filing date10License<3.5%Life'His t ory'of'a'PatentAppeals 2-3%,Interference <1%DivisionalsEnforce /Litigate 1.5%Office Actions(Cites + ~43%;Claims-)PeriodicRenewal3.5 yr ~85%7.5 yr ~65%11.5 yr ~43%Do Nothing>95%Grant*85%Application(propensity byind., 25-80%)R&DPatentOfficeInventA,orneysFirm'IPManagersAbandonPatentExpiration* According to the USPTO, grant rates have steadily declined from 71% in 2000 to 53% in 2006, but legal scholars place the figure much higher.11Source: B. Hall’s website12Some'Background'Reading• A.B.'Jaffe'and'M.'Trajtenberg,'Patents,'Cita.ons,'and'Innova.ons,'2002• B.'Hall,'A.'Jaffe,'M.'Trajtenberg,'2001'“The'NBER'Patent'Cita.ons'DataFile:'Lessons,'Insights,'and'Methodological'Tools,”'NBER'Working'PaperNo.'8498• W.M.'Cohen,'R.R.'Nelson,'J.P.'Walsh,'2000'“Protec.ng'Their'IntellectualAssets:'Appropriability'Condi.ons'and'Why'U.S.'Manufacturing'FirmsPatents'(Or'Not)”'NBER'Working'Paper'No.'7552• J.R.'Allison,'M.A.'Lemley,'K.A.'Moore,'R.D.'Trunkey,'2004'“ ValuablePatents,”'Georgetown)Law)Journal)92• Walker,'R.1995'“Patents'as'Scien.fic'and'Technical'Literature.”'


View Full Document

Stanford E 140 - Lecture Notes

Download Lecture Notes
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Lecture Notes and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Lecture Notes 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?