DOC PREVIEW
MTU GE 4250 - Satellite orbits

This preview shows page 1-2-3-4-5-6 out of 17 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 17 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 17 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 17 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 17 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 17 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 17 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 17 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

2/21/12$1$Satellite orbits Satellite orbits • Satellites and their orbits • GEO • LEO • Special orbits (e.g., L1) • Satellite sensor types • Whiskbroom • Pushbroom • Pixel size calculation2/21/12$2$Launch Launch of Aura satellite July 15, 2004 Vandenberg, CA ~96% fuel ~4% payload Recent launch failures: Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) Glory Satellite orbits Launch of Aura satellite July 15, 2004 Vandenberg, CA • Determined by Kepler’s Laws • Planets (and satellites) move in elliptical orbits • The square of the orbital period is proportional to the cube of the semi-major axis of the orbit • Altered by atmospheric drag, gravity of Sun and Moon • Orbital period = time taken for satellite to circle the Earth • P0 = orbital period, a = semi-major axis of ellipse (satellite altitude + Earth radius [~6380 km]), G = Gravitational constant, M = mass of Earth (GM = 3.986×1014 m3 s-2) • NB. This assumes that the Earth is spherically symmetric (it isn’t) € P0= 2πa3GM2/21/12$3$Geostationary orbits (GEO) Launch of Aura satellite July 15, 2004 Vandenberg, CA • Special type of geosynchronous orbit • Orbital period = period of Earth’s rotation • 86164 seconds for a sidereal day • Circular orbit around the equator with zero inclination • Orbit is stationary with respect to a location on the Earth • Advantages: high temporal resolution, always visible (e.g., weather forecasting, communications); ~5-15 minutes • Disadvantages: cost, lower spatial resolution than polar-orbiting sensors, poor coverage of high latitudes (>55ºN/S) GOES-East (US; 75ºW)2/21/12$4$GOES-West (US; 135ºW) MTSAT (Japan; 140ºE)2/21/12$5$Fengyun (FY-2E; China; 112ºE) Kalpana (India; 74ºE)2/21/12$6$Meteosat-7 (Europe; 57ºE) Meteosat-9 (Europe; 0ºE)2/21/12$7$GOES Super Rapid-Scan http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/archives/6849 Polar or Low-Earth orbits (LEO) Launch of Aura satellite July 15, 2004 Vandenberg, CA2/21/12$8$Polar or Low-Earth orbits (LEO) Launch of Aura satellite July 15, 2004 Vandenberg, CA • Useful altitude range: ~500-2000 km above Earth’s surface • Constrained by atmospheric friction and van Allen belts (high flux of energetic charged particles) • Because Earth is not spherical, polar orbits precess (rotate) about the Earth’s polar axis • Sun-synchronous orbits precess at the same rate that the Earth orbits the Sun • Altitudes ~700-800 km, periods of 98-102 minutes • 14-15 orbits per day • e.g., NOAA-X satellites (US), MetOp (Europe) • Advantages: high spatial resolution, polar coverage • Disadvantages: low temporal resolution (at low latitudes) LEO repeat cycles Launch of Aura satellite July 15, 2004 Vandenberg, CA If Earth makes an integral number of rotations in the time taken for the satellite to complete an integral number of orbits, the sub-satellite track repeats exactly. e.g., NASA Aura satellite (705 km altitude) has a 16-day (233 orbit) repeat cycle2/21/12$9$LEO polar coverage Launch of Aura satellite July 15, 2004 Vandenberg, CA LEO orbits converge at the Poles, providing higher temporal resolution LEO at low inclination Launch of Aura satellite July 15, 2004 Vandenberg, CA NASA Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) – 35º inclination, 403 km altitude http://trmm.gsfc.nasa.gov2/21/12$10$LEO spacecraft constellations NASA’s A-Train L1 Lagrange point 1.5 million kilometers from Earth!2/21/12$11$Space junk 18,000 manmade objects and counting! LEO GEO Space-borne imaging systems • Cross-track scanners • Whiskbroom scanners • Pushbroom sensors • http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/sose/pirs_activity.html2/21/12$12$FOV – IFOV - GIFOV FOV: Field of View IFOV: Instantaneous FOV GIFOV: Ground-projected IFOV Cross-track scanner • Scans back and forth across the sensor’s swath • Scans each ground-resolution cell (pixel) one-by-one • Instantaneous field of view (IFOV) of sensor determines pixel size • Satellite moves along the orbital track as sensor scans across-track • Divided into ‘line’ and ‘whiskbroom’ scanners • Disadvantages: moving parts, expensive, short pixel ‘dwell time’, pixel distortion2/21/12$13$Whiskbroom scanner Landsat Multi-spectral Scanner (MSS) Dwell time (cross-track) • Time period over which sensor collects photons from an individual ground-resolution cell • Determines signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) • Given by [scan time per line]/[# of cells per line] • Example: • Landsat sensor with 30×30 m pixel, 185 km swath width; spacecraft velocity = ~7.5 km/s [along-track pixel size] / [orbital velocity] [swath width] / [cross-track pixel size]2/21/12$14$Along-track scanner (pushbroom) • Linear array of detectors aligned across-track (e.g., CCD) • Image built up by satellite movement in flight direction (no scanning mirror) • 2D detector arrays can acquire multi-spectral or hyperspectral data • Optics disperse wavelengths across detector array Along-track scanner (pushbroom)2/21/12$15$Dwell time (pushbroom) • Time period over which sensor collects photons from an individual ground-resolution cell • Determines signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) • Denominator = 1 in equation below in this case • Example: • Different sensitivities and responses in each detector pixel can cause ‘striping’ in pushbroom sensor data [along-track pixel size] / [orbital velocity] [swath width] / [cross-track pixel size] Satellite viewing geometry Sub-satellite point Nadir2/21/12$16$Pixel size calculation H Pixel size • β = Instantaneous Field of View (IFOV) • H = satellite altitude • Pixel size = 2 H tan (β/2) • Example: • Aura satellite altitude = 705 km • OMI (Ozone Monitoring Instrument) • OMI telescope IFOV in flight direction = 1º • Pixel size = 1410 tan (0.5) = 12.3 km • NB: strictly speaking, this is the Ground-projected IFOV (GIFOV) – pixel size could be different β Field of View (FOV) θ H FOV/2 • FOV = 2 H tan (scan angle + β/2) • H = satellite altitude • Example: • Aura satellite altitude = 705 km • OMI telescope swath FOV = 115º • FOV = 1410 tan (57.5) = 2213 km • But this assumes a flat Earth…2/21/12$17$Field of View (FOV) α re • Use Law of Sines • Note ambiguity for sin β • Swath width =


View Full Document
Download Satellite orbits
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Satellite orbits and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Satellite orbits 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?