1!Information and Propaganda!History of Information 103!Geoff Nunberg!April 21, 2009!1!Riefenstahl vs Capra!Both of the videos can be considered to be propaganda. They are both advertising for a specific purpose, both hyperbolizing the subject, and neither presenting the whole story. In “Why We Fight”, the Germans are compared as treacherous gangsters who have thrown away all their morals for sake of efficiency, while in “Triumph” the government is portrayed as having tremendous support of the people and is tremendously supporting of the people and their nationality. Yiding!2!Riefenstahl vs Capra!The Capra film is more effective to me personally than the “Triumph of the Will”. I think that this is a result of being an American and having twelve years of American History behind me in all levels of my education. Capra’s film is more successful in portraying the enemy as evil, power-hungry, and backstabbing while the German film only makes Hitler into a hero loved by the people and does not specify an enemy. - Sarah W.!3!Riefenstahl vs Capra!While Capra's use of evidence presentation of facts attempts to blur the line between journalism and propaganda, the selective inclusion of details like pictures of the first killed American solider and the general theme of Nazis betrayal makes the film as one-sided as it tries not to be. Hitler descending from the clouds into Nuremberg's Romanesque pomp is so incredibly celebratory of Nazi Germany's "rebirth" that there is little denying the power of Riefenstahl's work. Despite having grown up taught to despise everything that Nazi Germany was, I cannot help but sympathize with the intense emotional response that Germans had to the romanticism and grandeur of the Nazi rally. In that way I feel that Riefenstahl is more successful… William B.!4!Riefenstahl vs Capra!This film is effective in the way it evokes the emotions of its people. In the beginning of the film, it talks of the 16-year suffering that the Germans have been facing up to that point. It’s very patriotic in its imagery, showing aerial views of Germany as well as a grand entrance from Hitler in an airplane and large crowds smiling attentively. The music is triumphant and extravagant. This film does a better job of evoking an emotional response from the people and possibly gathering their support because of these details. This film touches the people in a much more personal level then the other, therefore making it more effective. -Katrina.!5!Puzzlers!What is the historical significance of the translation of the German word Kadaver? !6!Puzzlers!Who said "repetition ends by transforming into faith a simple tendency without the individual being aware of this work"?!7!Puzzlers!Who said "repetition ends by transforming into faith a simple tendency without the individual being aware of this work"?!8!Joseph Goebbels!Itinerary: 4/21!Propaganda, information, and the news!The history of propaganda!The origins of "objectivity"!The 20th century: propaganda comes of age!Propaganda and the "informed public"!9!10!The Case of “Infoganda”!2004: "Video News Releases" (VNR's) from the Office of National Drug Control Policy promote prescription drug program, w/ interviews of HHS sec. Tommy Thompson !2005: Revelation that Armstrong Williams accepted money to promote No Child Left Behind in his TV and radio programs!Frank Rich, Jon Stewart speak of 'infoganda'!11!The case of “Infoganda”!"It's propaganda no matter how you cut it."Bob Priddy, chairman of the Radio-Television News Directors Association!"Anyone who has questions about this practice needs to do some research on modern public information tools.” HHS spokesperson!VNR from Leiner Health Products !WCBS (NYC) Newscast, 3/22/06!The Long History of "Infoganda"!Persuasion in the age of the press & public opinion as a political force: propaganda tracks the development of “news”!"Government is nothing unless supported by opinion" "– Napoleon!Cf Napoleon’s efforts to control the Parisian press, "18th c. practice of paying subsidies to sympathetic newspapers...!12!13!Propaganda and the Modern State!The origins of indirection & euphemism:!Through the whole of this long letter of Roland, it is curious to remark how the nerve and vigor of his style, which had spoken so potently to his sovereign, is relaxed when he addresses himself to the sans-culottes... When he speaks to the populace, he can no longer be direct. The whole compass of the language is tried to find synonymes and circumlocutions for massacre and murder. Things are never called by their common names. Massacre is sometimes agitation, sometimes effervescence, sometimes excess, sometimes too continued an exercise of a revolutionary power. Edmund Burke, 1793 Cf “casualty” in Crimean War, “Acts of "collective indiscipline” in WWI!Burke RolandPropaganda and the truth of the photo!14!Roger Fenton, Crimea, 1855!Paris Commune, 1871!Civil War: !The army vs the press!Conflicting interests of the state: !Seeks positive publicity, which entails giving reporters access !Avoiding negative publicity entails restricting access. !Cf Civil War conflicts between Meade & Edward Crapsey of the Phil. Inquirer !1864: Union Sec’y of War Edwin Stanton begins to “leak” his war diaries to AP, presaging practice of issuing regular war bulletins to the press !Efforts to win support of British press for each side...!15!Aside: The Rise of Objectivity!16!19th c. forces leading to rise of “objectivity”!Weakening of partisanship. !1860 -- Gov’t Printing Office established!Reform movement, civil services, beginnings of progressivism!Enlarged markets for mass-circulation press/increasing dependence on advertising!Professionalization of journalism -- creation of journalism courses & schools!The cult of science!17!18!Growth of wire services!! [The AP’s] members [i.e. subscribers] are scattered from the Atlantic to the Pacific, from Canada to the Gulf, and represent every possible shade of political belief, religious faith, and economic sympathy. It is obvious that the Associated Press can have no partisan nor factional bias, no religious affiliation, no capitalistic nor pro-labor trend. Its function is simply to furnish its members with a truthful, clean, comprehensive, non-partisan…report of the news in the world as expeditiously as is compatible with accuracy…"Frank B. Noyes, president of the Associated Press, 1913"The Rise of Objectivity!Objectivity as a