DOC PREVIEW
MIT 14 385 - Quantile Methods 2

This preview shows page 1-2-19-20 out of 20 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 20 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 20 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 20 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 20 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 20 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Lecture 9: Quantile Methods 2 1. Equivariance. 2. GMM for Quantiles. 3. Endogenous Models 4. Empirical Examples 1 Cite as: Victor Chernozhukov, course materials for 14.385 Nonlinear Econometric Analysis, Fall 2007. MIT OpenCourseWare (http://ocw.mit.edu), Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Downloaded on [DD Month YYYY].1. Equivariance to Monotone Transformations. Theorem (Equivariance of Quantiles under Mono-tone Transformations): Let Y = Q(U|X) be the Sko-rohod representation of Y in terms of its conditional quantile function, then for the weakly increasing trans-formation T (·|X), which is possibly X-dependent, we have T (Y |X) ≡ T [Q(U|X)|X] ≡ QT (Y |X)(U|X). Proof: The composi ti on T [Q[·|X]|X] of two mono-tone weakly increasing functions gives a weakly increas-ing monotone function with domain [0, 1]. Thus the composition is the proper quantile function. � Remark. The same is generally not true of the con-ditional expectation function: E[T (Y |X)|X] =� T [E(Y |X)|X]. Affine or location-scale transformations commute with conditional expectations, but more general transforma-tions usually do not. 2 Cite as: Victor Chernozhukov, course materials for 14.385 Nonlinear Econometric Analysis, Fall 2007. MIT OpenCourseWare (http://ocw.mit.edu), Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Downloaded on [DD Month YYYY].Examples. 1. Y = ln W and QY |X(u) = X�β(u), then QW(u|X) = exp(X�β(u)). The same cannot be done generally for mean regression. Many standard duration models specify ln W = x�β + �, � is indep of X where W is a positive random variabl e (duration, capital stock in (S,s) models, wage). Quantile regression allows us to cover and immedia tel y generalize these models. 2. Yb = max[0, Y ] and QY |X(u) = x�β(u), then QYb[u|X] = max[0, x�β(u)]. This is censored quantile regression m odel. Estimation can be done using nonlinear quantile regression (Powell, 1984, JoE). A computationally attractive approximation to Powell’s estimator is given in Chernozhukov and Hong (2002, JASA). 3. Yc = 1{Y > 0} and QY |X(u) = x�β(u), then QYc[u|X] = 1{x�β(u) > 0}. This is the binary quantile regression or maximum score model. Estimation can be done using nonlinear quan-tile regression, known as the maximum score esti m a tor (Manski, 1975, H orow itz, 1997, Kordas, 2005). This estimator is ver y hard to compute. Cite as: Victor Chernozhukov, course materials for 14.385 Nonlinear Econometric Analysis, Fall 2007. MIT OpenCourseWare (http://ocw.mit.edu), Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Downloaded on [DD Month YYYY].GMM and Bayesian GMM for Q uantiles, cf. Cher-nozhukov and Hong (JoE, 2003) Moment restriction: E[u − 1(Y < X�β(u))|Z] = 0, where Z could differ from X for endogenous cases. Sample analogs of these equations are piecewise-constant functions. 1 Q�(β) = n 2g�(β)TWng�(β) with g�(β) = En[(u − 1(Yi ≤ Xi�β)�Zi] and Wn =1 �En[ZiZi�]�−1 . u(1 − u) Conventional extremum estim a tor is β∗ = arg inf Q�(β), β∈Θ but it is hard, if not impossible, to compute, except on paper. Chernozhukov and Hong (JoE, 2003) propose to use quasi-posterior mean (“Bayesian GMM”): �� e−Q�(β) � βˆ= β dβ. Θ � Θ e−Q�(β�)dβ� 3 Cite as: Victor Chernozhukov, course materials for 14.385 Nonlinear Econometric Analysis, Fall 2007. MIT OpenCourseWare (http://ocw.mit.edu), Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Downloaded on [DD Month YYYY].Integration vi a Markov Chain Monte Carlo. Image by MIT OpenCourseWare. Theorem (Chernozhukov and Hong, 2003): Un-der regularity conditions, quasi-posterior mean and ex-tremum estimators are fi r st-order equivalent: √n(βˆ− β(u)) = √n(β∗− β(u)) + op(1) = (G�W G)−1G�W√ng�(βˆ(u)) + op(1) d −→ N(0, (G�W G)−1), Cite as: Victor Chernozhukov, course materials for 14.385 Nonlinear Econometric Analysis, Fall 2007. MIT OpenCourseWare (http://ocw.mit.edu), Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Downloaded on [DD Month YYYY].where G = �βE[(u − 1(Yi ≤ Xi�β)�Zi] = EfY (X�β(u)|X, Z)ZX�, and W =1 �EZZ��−1 . u(1 − u) Remarks: 1) Estimation of G can be done analogously to estima-tion of J in QR case. 2) For practical experience with computation, see Cher-nozhukov and Hong (2003). Cite as: Victor Chernozhukov, course materials for 14.385 Nonlinear Econometric Analysis, Fall 2007. MIT OpenCourseWare (http://ocw.mit.edu), Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Downloaded on [DD Month YYYY].2. An Endogenous Quantile Regression Model Reference: Chernozhukov and Hansen (2004, 2005, 2006), Chernozhukov and Hong (2003). Empirical Applications: H a usma n and Sidak (2003), Januscewski (2003), others. Model: Y = D�α(U) + X�β(U), D = δ(X, Z , V ), U|Z, X ∼ U ni form(0, 1), u �→ D�α(u) + X�β(u) strictly increasing in u. • D�α(u) + X�β(u) is Structural Quantile Function/ Quantile Treatment R esponse Function Y is the outcome variable, X covariates, D endogenous vari a bl es, Z instruments, U outcome disturbance, V selection disturbance. • Dependence of U and V causes endogeneity. • Independence of U and Z is crucial. 4 Cite as: Victor Chernozhukov, course materials for 14.385 Nonlinear Econometric Analysis, Fall 2007. MIT OpenCourseWare (http://ocw.mit.edu), Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Downloaded on [DD Month YYYY].Example: Demand-Supply ln Qp = α0(U) + α1(U) ln(p),· ln Sp = f(p, Z, U), (1) P ∈ {p : Qp = Sp}, U independent of Z and normalized U(0, 1). U is a demand di sturbance, “level of dema nd”; U is a supply disturbance, “level of supply”; p �→ α0(1/2)+α1(1/2) l n(p) is the median demand curve; p �→ α0(u) + α1(u) ln(p) is the u-quantile demand curve; demand elasticity α1(u) varies with u. Equilibrium quantity Y and price P wil l satisfy ln Y = α0(U) + α1(U) ln P, P = δ(Z, U, U, “sunspots”),� ��V � U is independent of Z. 5 Cite as: Victor Chernozhukov, course materials for 14.385 Nonlinear Econometric Analysis, Fall 2007. MIT


View Full Document

MIT 14 385 - Quantile Methods 2

Download Quantile Methods 2
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Quantile Methods 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Quantile Methods 2 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?