1Theories of language development Attempts to understand human language development date back to 7thcentury B.C. Five theories covered in Owens (2008) chapter 2: Behavioral Syntactic Semantic/Cognitive Sociolinguistic Emergentist Be prepared to compare and contrast ideas among these theoriesNature versus Nurture Debate is really a continuum Most human talents are probably both born and made Different theories tend to focus on different aspects of language Biases and preferences of researchers Need to limit research questions Debate became heated in 1960s and 1970s Skinner 1957 Chomsky 1959 Brown 1973Behavioral Interpretation Rooted in behavioral psychology (Skinner) “Empiricist” from word empirical, meaning must have evidence Only study behavior that can be measured or observed No study of mental states or internalstructures Although mental and internal exist, cannot study what cannot observe Goal to be able to predict future behaviors2Language is like other behaviors At early stage, language is a simple behavior Language is a habit Child is passive in language-learning process Language models in the environment “fill up” the child Child imitates models Environment is critical: Differences among children considered evidence of effect of environmentClassical Conditioning Pavlov’s dog Meat powder = Unconditioned stimulus (UCS) Salivating = Unconditioned response (UCR) Bell = Conditioned stimulus (CS) Word learning Object of desire = UCS Physiological response = UCR Word = CS A CS word becomes a UCS and elicits another word that is associated with it Classical Conditioning, or associationism, is used mostly to explain receptive language learning and word learning/vocabularyOperant Conditioning Operant any behavior that can be increased or decreased by responses that follow it Reinforcement A consequence that causes behavior to increase Environmental consequences can increase or decrease human behavior Children’s speech is rewarded by parents Punishment A consequence that causes behavior to decrease Antecedent The preceding event to the target behavior that causes the target behavior or controls the frequency of behavior3Behavioral Terms Shaping Reinforcement of a series of small behaviors that gradually approximate the target behavior Successive approximations Example: “du” “ju” “juice” “juice please” etc. Chaining Many complex behaviors are really a series of chained behaviors with multiple stimuli, reinforcers, etc. Example: Computer skills Each word becomes the stimulus for the next word in the sentence Example: “The boy hit the ball”Evaluation of Behavioral Theory Limitations Role of imitation is not certain Children say things adults don’t say “I broked it” Cannot count on reinforcement from parents Parents correct for meaning not form Inadequate explanation of complex language Cannot account for novel or creative utterances Contribution Learning plays a part Learn language of parents Intervention
View Full Document