DOC PREVIEW
ISU POL 106 - Courts and the Legal System

This preview shows page 1-2 out of 5 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 5 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 5 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 5 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

POL 106 1st Edition Lecture 16 Outline of Last Lecture I. Traditional Presidency v. Modern PresidencyII. Presidential PoliticsIII. Managing the Presidential EstablishmentIV. Presidential Character & CitizensOutline of Current Lecture V. The Legal SystemVI. CourtsVII. Supreme CourtCurrent Lecture The Legal SystemThe Role of Law in Democratic Societies:- Provide security- Provide predictability- Resolve conflict- Reflect and enforce conformity to society’s values- Distribute benefits and rewards society has to offer and allocate the costs of those good thingsCharacteristics of the American Legal Tradition:- Generally based on common law (law created by courts based on precedent)- Both federal and state court systems use laws created by legislatures, known as codes and statutes- Includes constitutions, executive orders, and administrative regulations- Importance of stare decisis and common law traditionThese notes represent a detailed interpretation of the professor’s lecture. GradeBuddy is best used as a supplement to your own notes, not as a substitute.Kinds of Law:Substantive Laws: Written law that defines rights and duties, such as crimes and punishments, civil rights, and responsibilities in civil law.Procedural Laws: Comprises the rules by which a court hears and determines what happens in civil lawsuit, criminal, or administrative proceedings.Criminal Laws: Regulates social conduct and proscribes whatever is threatening, harmful, or otherwise endangering to the property, health, safety, and moral welfare of people.Civil Laws: Core principles are codified into a referable system which serves as the primary source of law.Constitutional Laws: Defines the relationship of different entities within a state, namely, the executive, legislature, and the judiciary.Common Law/Cases: Laws developed by judges through decisions of courts and similar tribunals, as opposed to statutes adopted through the legislative process or regulations issued by the executive branch.Statutory Laws: Written LawsAdministrative Laws: Governs the activities of administrative agencies of the government.Executive Orders: Helps officers and agencies of the executive branch manage the operations within the federal government itself. CourtsJudicial Review: - Hamilton predicted that the judicial branch would be the least dangerous branch of gov’t in Federalist No. 78- Court had power of neither the purse nor the sword- Approved of judicial review because it would check momentary passions of the people- Constitution itself does not specifically give this power-Marbury v. Madison- John Marshall and the expansion of the power of the Supreme Court- Used sparingly to strike down federal law- More frequently used to strike down state law- Supreme Court granted this power unto itselfOriginal Jurisdiction: - US district courts- State trial courtsAppellate Jurisdiction: - US courts of appeals- State intermediate appellate courts- State supreme courts**The Supreme Court is the only court with both original and appellate jurisdictionUS District Courts:- Lowest level of federal court system- 94 district courts (each state has at least one)- Hear both criminal and civil cases- Juries responsible for verdict- For federal district court to hear case  must concern federal law, Constitution, or two parties from different states with amount in controversy exceeding $75K- Vast majority of cases are filed and heard in state courtsUS Court of Appeals:- Arranged into 12 circuits- Solely appellate jurisdiction- No new evidence or witnesses- Panel of three judges make ruling, not jury- Lower court must have made an error of lawUS State Courts:- 3 levels: state supreme court, state appellate court, and trial court system- Trial court level includes:o State district courtso Probate courtso Superior courtso Housing courtso Small claims courts- Few states have no intermediate appellate courtsSelecting Judges:State: Method varies by state- Appointment- Nonpartisan election- Partisan electionFederal: Nominated by President and confirmed by the Senate- Senatorial courtesy is often invoked for lower-level federal courtsCitizens and the Courts:- Equal treatment by the criminal justice system is the goal (not always reality)- Prejudice against certain individuals still remains- Equal access to civil justice systemo Not always realityo Few can afford an attorney to pursue smaller caseso System isn’t “user-friendly”- Almost all individuals, in civil or criminal cases, expect a fair trial when they need one, yet everyone avoids jury duty Supreme CourtSCOTUS:- Nine justices (wasn’t always like that)- Appointed by president- Confirmed by senate- Not all appointments have been controversial or newsworthy- Justices serve during good behavior and are appointed for “life”, not a term- Justices can be impeached- Being a Supreme Court justice was not a prestigious position when our nation was just starting out4 Criteria Considered for SC appointments:- Merit- Political ideologyo Strict constructionism v. judicial interpretivismo Judicial activism v. judicial restraint- Reward- RepresentationChoosing Which Cases to Hear:- Petitioning the SC- Plaintiff files a writ of certiorari (writ of cert)- Only 2% of petitions filed ever get heard- It can take many years for a case to finally be heard- Other influences, including whether US gov’t is a party in the caseDeciding Cases:- Strict constructionism v. judicial interpretivism- Judicial activism v. judicial restraint- External factorso Public opiniono Executive brancho Amicus briefsWriting Opinions:- Opiniono Chief justice (if in the majority) will assign this opinion to someone in the majority; sometimes written by the Chief Justiceo If chief justice is in minority, senior-most justice in the majority assigns the opinion- Majority Opinion: Judicial opinion agreed to by more than half the members of a court.- Concurring Opinion: Written opinion by one or more judges of a court which agrees with the majority opinion but for differing reasons.- Plurality Opinion: Opinion from a group of judges, often in appellate courts, in which no single opinion received the support of a majority of the court. Did not receive support of more than half the justices, but received more support than any other.-


View Full Document
Download Courts and the Legal System
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Courts and the Legal System and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Courts and the Legal System 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?