JOURN 4000 1st Edition Lecture 23Outline of Last LectureI. LibelII. Internet providers Outline of Current LectureI. LibelII. Privacy lawsCurrent LectureCalder Case- suit where effects felt-Minimum contacts necessary -Specific jurisdiction, general jurisdiction-Borrowing shorter statute of limitations:1) Where did the publication originate and 2) what is that statute of limitations-Zippo case/test-Passive website? Can’t be dragged out of state-Doing business? Can be dragged out of stateGutnick case- WSJ-Gutnick money launderer -Sues in Australia -Upload occurred in Jersey, download in AustraliaThese notes represent a detailed interpretation of the professor’s lecture. GradeBuddy is best used as a supplement to your own notes, not as a substitute.-Place of publication= place of download-Suit is in Australia2005- WSJ-Provided funds for Osama Bin Laden-Guy from Saudi Arabia, sued in GB-Wasn’t enough contact in GB for jurisdictionUN guy Kenya, Ivory Coast, Canada-Roving jurisdiction-Sued in Canada, they said no-Guy thought any place he landed, that’s where he could sueTargeting- Don King reputation to protect everywhere, meaning he can sue anywhereRoman Polanski plead guilty to statutory rape-Fled to France doesn’t have extradition treaty based on those charges-Vanity Fair 2005 said something he didn’t like, wanted to sue VF in GB-GB allowed him to sue-Yahoo case-Dr Rachel Erenthel (sp?) wrote a book about funding terrorism-Suit in GB didn’t leave home in NY- Asked NY to assert jurisdiction declaratory judgment on decision-NY said they had long-armed jurisdiction only if it involved a tort or contract-Bill passed in NY Libel Terrorism Protection Act-Passed as federal law in 2010-Foreign libel judgment are not enforceable unless they comply with US lawPrivacy law:-Don’t have to fill out a form for info according to MO law-Access law Ch. 610-Snapchat hack-Arthur Ashe-Drone
View Full Document
Unlocking...