DOC PREVIEW
Mizzou PSYCH 2410 - Eyewitness Testimonies
Type Lecture Note
Pages 2

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

PSYCH 2410 1st Edition Lecture 14Outline of Conceptual DevelopmentI. CategoriesII. Symbolic DevelopmentIII. Pretend PlayOutline of Eyewitness TestimonyI. Suggestibility II. Interviewer BiasIII. StereotypesIV. Questioning Eyewitness TestimonyI. Suggestibility- More than 100,000 children testify in court every year (40% under 5)- Testimony relies on autobiographical memory o This memory is imperfect and malleable at all ages- Loftus experiment o Method: watched a movie of crash involving cars, there was no broken headlight;asked “did you see a broken headlight” vs “did you see the broken headlight”o Results: if asked second question they are more likely to say yes o Conclusion: it is easy to be susceptible toe suggestionII. Interviewer Bias- Interviewer has preconceived beliefs about what happenedo Asks leading questionso Fails to ask questions that explore alternative hypotheseso Confirmation bias- Thompson experimento Method: the kids see the janitor either cleaning toys or playing with toys in a room. Either an accusatory interviewer (biased against Chester), exculpatory interviewer (likes Chester), or neutral interviewer. o Results: Actual behavior cleaning- A=playing, E=cleaning, N=cleaning. Actual behavior playing- A=playing, E=cleaning, N=playing. III. Stereotypes - Children’s previous knowledge of the protagonist might affect their memory for the events- Sam Stone Study o Method: kids are told that Sam Stone is a clumsy guy to implant a stereotype. When Sam visits there are no incidents.o Results: several weeks later kids are interviewed. No stereotype= no mischievous behavior by Sam Stone. Stereotype= Sam Stone engaged in mischievous behavior. Younger are more susceptibleo Professionals observed the children being interviewed and asked to rate children’s credibility. The most accurate children were rated as least credible and the least accurate children were rated as most credible. IV. Questioning- Specific questions: Where did he touch you? Did he touch you on your face/body?o Children are less accurate on the specific questions- Forced-choice questions: “did he touch your ears or your nose?”o Children don’t often say I don’t know or none of the above- Repeated Specific Questions: kids watched an ambiguous event and questioned about ito Ex: Did the man hit the woman? 40% changed their stories- Repeated Interviews: children get 10 interviews before courto False narratives become more convincingo Many studies show that adults cannot tell apart true from false memories reported by children- Symbolic Tools: use of anatomically correct dollso Kids struggle with dual representationSUMMARY:- Do not repeat yes or no specific questions- Reduce number of interviews- Interview children soon after the event- Use unbiased interviewers- Avoid biased questioning- Interviewers should: be patient, non-judgemental, not offer rewards for answers or make


View Full Document
Download Eyewitness Testimonies
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Eyewitness Testimonies and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Eyewitness Testimonies 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?