DOC PREVIEW
CU-Boulder FILM 3660 - Greenberg v. Steinberg
Type Lecture Note
Pages 2

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

IPHY 2420 1nd Edition Lecture 15 Outline of Last Lecture – October 8, 2014I. Nopal Cactus & RembrandtII. Duchamp – The BottlerackIII. The ReadymadeIV. The First Independent’s Exhibition of ART V. Duchamp – The Bride Stripped by her BachelorsVI. IndexVII. Automatic vs. Autographic Paintings:VIII. TOPHAT QUESTIONSOutline of Current Lecture – October 10, 2014I. Greenberg II. SteinbergCurrent Lecture:I. Greenberg: - Relationships between different studies – borrowing from other sources.- Art is a whole value system and valuable in its own right – art is autonomous.- Greenberg is whom the post-modern disagrees with. - Each art domain has its own tools and values to be borrowed from (literature andart) - Art strives to achieve its own “PURITY” or spirit – art and literature are trying to purify themselves in there own terms and in themselves.- Purification from flatness of painting – modernist should bring life and depth andtexture.- One to one ratio of art and the viewer – the eye and sight have a different type ofexperience than touch or smell. This experience is intelligent and not physical.3 Main Themes for Greenberg:1. Autonomy of Medium Specify: Purify specific quality and value of the art pieceThese notes represent a detailed interpretation of the professor’s lecture. GradeBuddy is best used as a supplement to your own notes, not as a substitute.2. Orientation with the Viewer: One to One ratio – experience between viewer and the painting.3. Depth: Figurative or literal travel of intellectual thought through the eye. II. Steinberg:- Direct response to Greenberg – IT IS NOT ABOUT PURITY. - Terms that Greenberg was using no longer fits into art. - The orientation with viewer is no longer about the viewer; instead the painting is holding the power and putting the viewer in a position.- Instead of vertical experience it is horizontal- this relates to INDEX.- Index: When something leaves a lasting impact or impression on art – physical altercation, relationship based on impact and impression. Not based on representation or symbols. - “No law against painting a rug on the


View Full Document

CU-Boulder FILM 3660 - Greenberg v. Steinberg

Type: Lecture Note
Pages: 2
Download Greenberg v. Steinberg
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Greenberg v. Steinberg and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Greenberg v. Steinberg 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?