DOC PREVIEW
HARVARD MATH 21A - Perpetual Motion Machines

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Perpetual Motion Machines O. Knill, Math21aABSTRACT. Is it possible to produce devices which produce energy? Such a machine is called a perpetualmotion machine. It is also called with its latin name perpetuum mobile.LINE INTEGRALS. If F (x, y, z) is a vector field and γ : t 7→ r(t) is a curve, then W =RbaF (r(t)) · r0(t) dt iscalled a line integral along the curve. The short-hand notationRγF · ds is also used. If F is a force field,then W is work.CLOSED CURVES. The fundamental theorem of line integrals assures that the line integral along a closedcurve is zero if the vector field is a gradient field. The work done along a closed path is zero. In a physicalcontext, this can be understood as energy conservation.ENERGY CONSERVATION. All physical experiments so far confirm that static force fields in our universeare of the form F = −∇U, where U is a function called the potential energy. If a body moves in this forcefield, its acceleration satisfies by Newton’s laws m¨x = F (x). The function H(x(t)) = ˙x2/2 + U(x) is conserved:d/dtH(x(t)) = ¨x ˙x + ∇U(x) ˙x = (¨x + ∇U(x)) ˙x = 0. The law of energy conservation is also called the first lawof thermodynamics.PERPETUUM MOBILES.A machine which implements a force field whichis not a gradient field is called a perpetuummobile or perpetual motion machine. Math-ematically, it implements a force field in whichsome closed loops have a non-vanishing lineintegral. By possibly changing the direction ofmotion, the energy change can always be madepositive.The first law of thermodynamics forbids theexistence of such a machine. It is informative tostudy some of the ideas people have come up inhistory (and today!) and to see why they don’twork. Also the drawings of Escher suggest, usinggraphical tricks, that perpetual motion should ex-ist.WHY ARE THERE NO PERPETUUM MOBILES?As an ”explanation” one can invoke the antropic principle:In a universe with a perpetuum mobile, an arbitrary amount of energy could be produced out of nothing andnothing would prevent this to happen spontaneously. This energy production could lead to energy fluctuations.These energy bursts would destroy an observer.This argument is not a proof for the nonexistence of perpetual motion machine but it provides a plausiblereason, why the first law of thermodynamics should hold. A world without this law would likely be toohostile for life to exist.WHEEL SUGGESTIONS (1235).The oldest known attempt for a perpetuum motion machineis from the year 1245. There are seven hammers attachedto a wheel. On the top, the weights flip on the other sidein order that on the left hand side, there will always be 4weights and on the right hand side three. A similar ideawas designed by Leonardo da Vinci around 1500. You mightthink that such inventions from the past. The web is how-ever full with suggestions See for example http://www.free-energy.co.uk.WATER MACHINE (1620).Water flowing down turns an pump which transports thewater back up. There are many variants of this idea: aelectric motor which turns a generator whose electricity isused to power the motor. In all of these ideas, there isa twist like some kind of gear or change of voltage whichconfuses a naive observer.BALL MACHINE (1997).The energy needed to lift the balls up is claimed to besmaller than the energy gained from pushing the otherballs. The website http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/rsmot.htmon which the idea was posted says: ”This device is NOTTESTED today”U TUBE SUGGESTION.The first suggestion for a perpetual motionmachine is a O shaped tube which is filled onone side with water. There are two valves eachof which when closed prevent the water fromfalling. Opening and closing the walls doesnot use energy. A wooden ball falls in the airand is dragged up inside the water.MAGNETIC MACHINES on http ://www.geocities.com/k pullo/P M3.htmm, there isan attempt for a perpetual motion machine based onmagnets. The author seems serious in claiming that themagnetic field from the moving magnet will change themagnetic field from the stationary magnets in such a waythat the magnet will move.A RECENT INVENTION.The web is full of suggestions. An example of a perpetuum mo-bile which had actually been built is a machine by Reidar


View Full Document

HARVARD MATH 21A - Perpetual Motion Machines

Documents in this Course
PDE’s

PDE’s

2 pages

PDE's

PDE's

2 pages

Review

Review

2 pages

intro

intro

2 pages

curve

curve

2 pages

mid1

mid1

7 pages

p-1

p-1

6 pages

contour

contour

2 pages

practice1

practice1

10 pages

diffeq1

diffeq1

6 pages

TRACES

TRACES

2 pages

PDE's

PDE's

2 pages

Review

Review

108 pages

GRAPHS

GRAPHS

2 pages

Review

Review

4 pages

VECTORS

VECTORS

2 pages

Load more
Download Perpetual Motion Machines
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Perpetual Motion Machines and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Perpetual Motion Machines 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?