DOC PREVIEW
Mizzou JOURN 4000 - School law
Type Lecture Note
Pages 3

This preview shows page 1 out of 3 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

JOURN 4000 1st Edition Lecture 13Outline of Last LectureI. School lawOutline of Current LectureI. School lawCurrent LectureBrennan on Hazelwood- thought control Miami Herald vs. Tornillo-editors have control over content first amendment right Tinker vs. Des Moines-Students have freedom of expression, even on controversial subjects IF they do not:1. Materially/substantially interfere with school discipline/cause disruption2. Can’t collide with rights of others-Hazelwood is different two different questionsTinker- First Amendment requires school to tolerate free speech?Hazelwood- First Amendment requires school to promote free speech?Pepish vs. MU Board of Curartors-Suspended for passing out flyers-Filed 1983, declaratory judgment court’s judgment of rights and responsibilities of involved parties-MU did not have a right to suspend herIn loco parentis- school is in same relationship to student as parent to childThese notes represent a detailed interpretation of the professor’s lecture. GradeBuddy is best used as a supplement to your own notes, not as a substitute.-States may give students greater freedom of expression laws than the first amendment-Some states have greater freedom of student speech-Does Hazelwood apply to college press?--> not sure, courts have split on decisionKincaid vs. Gibson-Destination Unknown yearbook, poor style and content-Courts said school has to allow it if not, viewpoint discriminationSchoolteacher’s rights:Cecilia Lacks- English/journalism teacher, fired for allowing students to produce in-class videos using curse wordsPyle brothers-Wore profane t-shirts-Do high school students in Massachusetts have freedom of non-school expression?Court certified the question- asked Massachusetts Supreme Court if shirts were acceptable yes 1973- Pawnee youth in Oklahoma-School policy said boys could not have hair touching ears/collar -Boys were sent home-US let decision stand-dissent: newfound pride in heritageCensorship of books:Pico case- Justice Brennan1983- Committee-> school board decided to pull books out of library-School board has absolute discretion on classroom assigned books, not beyond-Looks at motivation viewpoint control is not ok-Obit websitereporter said kid had a hit list expelled kid did not intend to do that-Teacher sux website why she should die graphic photo of her death, asked for funds to hire hit man can be expelledBong Hits 4 Jesus message is pro-illegal drugs, school can suspend-Legalized medical marijuana, school can’t suspend-Bottom line- doesn’t matter what technology is, threats are not


View Full Document

Mizzou JOURN 4000 - School law

Type: Lecture Note
Pages: 3
Download School law
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view School law and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view School law 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?