CJ 100 MWF 9-9:50 Lecture 9Outline of Current Lecture II. 4th Amendment cont.III. Florida vs JardinesIV. Terry vs OhioV. Motor Vehicle ExemptionVI. Fifth AmendmentVII. Grand JuryVIII. Miranda WarningsCurrent Lecture4th and 5th AmendmentsK-9 Searches- Sniff by a police dog is NOT a search under the 4th amendment (US v. Place 1983) - Positive alerts by K-9 units are treated as a probable cause Florida v. Jardines (2013)- Is a K-9 unit sniff outside of the house a 4th amendment “search”?? A “search” requires both probable cause and a search warrant Terry v Ohiobased on reasonable suspicion and individual can receive a stop and friskTerry stop is an exampleMotor Vehicle Exemption Allows the search of a motor vehicle without a search warrant (still have to have probable cause)Examples of probable cause: sight or smell of contraband (plain view, plain smell)Minor traffic violations are not probable causeThese notes represent a detailed interpretation of the professor’s lecture. GradeBuddy is best used as a supplement to your own notes, not as a substitute.Fifth AmendmentGrand Jury IndictmentsGrand Jury decides whether the prosecution has enough evidence to bring a defendant to trialUsed in all federal cases- State has the choiceProbable Cause= indictment (formal charging) = green light to proceed No probable cause = “no bill” = suspect not charged Grand JuriesProsecutor presents evidence against the suspectAdvantageous for prosecution because1. Proceedings are “secretive” (only prosecutor and jury are present) 2. Exclusionary rule does not apply to grand jury proceedings3. Prosecutor can choose which evidence is presented to the jury Miranda WarningsMiranda vs Arizona (1966)- protects Fifth Amendment rights of individuals against self incriminationRights read AFTER a person has officially been taken into custody, but before any interrogation takes place.After one is put into a detention/correction but before incriminating
View Full Document
Unlocking...