DOC PREVIEW
UNT BEHV 3200 - Exam 1 Study Guide
Type Study Guide
Pages 5

This preview shows page 1-2 out of 5 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 5 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 5 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 5 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

BEHV 3200.001Exam # 1 Study Guide Weeks: 1 - 4Open-mindedness (September 2)What does it mean to be open-minded?Open-mindedness: willingness to consider new ideasVideo on Open-mindedness:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T69TOuqaqXIWatch video and determine what you thought were valid points and what you disagreed with.Did you agree with the video's definition of open-mindedness? Belief in the Weird (September 4) What is weirdness?- Is it when someone believes something you don't?- Is it radical or new?Characteristics of Weirdness:- little to no scientific justification- defies “common sense”- appeals to “other” sources of knowledgeWhy do people believe weird things?- Intermittent Reinforcement – Sometimes weird things are true, and because one weird thing is true, it must mean that other weird things are as well, regardless of (a lack of) evidence or justification.Example: Meteorites were deemed impossible until there was scientific evidence of them. If giant rocks can fall from the sky, then can ghosts, aliens, and the devil also exist?- Gender – Gender does not influence the likelihood of belief, but does influence the content of belief.Example: Women are more likely to believe in alternative healing and precognition (internal, intuitive beliefs), while men are more likely to believe in aliens and monsters (external beliefs). - Education – Scientific education does not affect belief in pseudoscience; there is no correlation between competency in science and likelihood to believe pseudoscience (Walker et al 2001).Issue: Science is taught as an assemblage of facts, while education in critical thinking is lacking.- Locus of Control – Some personality traits may predict susceptibility; those with an eternal locus of control are more likely to believe pseudosciences◦ External locus of control: You are not the source of control in your life. (ie. fate, predestination, etc.)▪ Example: When taking an exam, success or failure would be due to professor or exam format. ◦ Internal locus of control: You are the driving force in your life. ▪ Example: When taking an exam, success or failure is due to personal ability or effort.Bronislaw Malinowski's (1925) observations of the Trobriand Islanders found that they combined superstition (magic ritual) and science (sophisticated crop rotation and fishing techniques) and saw them as a different but coexisting. Applied magic and superstition to situations that were out of their control, such as in times of drought or flood or when sea fishing, while situations that were within their control, such as seasonal farming and small scale fishing, allowed for the use of scientific advances. - IQ – IQ is not related to susceptibility to pseudoscientific beliefs. Those with higher IQ's are, however, better at creating elaborate rationalizations for our beliefs and are better able to defend them. Example: Isaac Newton, inventor of modern physics, believed firmly in alchemy and the ability to turn base metals into gold. Intellectual Attribution Error: - Related to the fundamental attribution error in psychology- Is the tendency to to find rationalizations for our beliefs, but attribute the belief in others to emotional need, upbringing, fear, etc.2Pseudoscience (September 9 and 11)Pseudoscience: - “the use of scientific sounding words or icons to justify quackery” (Pinkston)- “a doctrine or belief system that pretends to be science” (Hines, from readings)Characteristics:- Irrefutable Hypothesis – no amount of data can be brought against the hypothesis to disconfirm it◦ Morgellon's Disease: Hundreds of people complain of embedded fibers, possibly parasites; CDC conducts three year study, (skin biopsies, physical samples, blood work, teratology) and finds no evidence of parasite, infection, or toxin; cannot prove that they are not in pain, but no evidence exists of any medical condition- Unwillingness to Look Closely at Data – failure to look at contradicting evidence◦ Therapeutic Touch: No evidence of therapeutic touch as a medical treatment, however testimonies support the use- Looking for Mysteries – giving disproportionate weight to small amounts of data that cannot be explained by normal science◦ Santa Claus: Children have claimed to see Santa, regardless of significant data to prove otherwise, small amounts of data, such as multiple eye witness reports that cannot be disproven, are given more weight as evidence- Failure to Update Theories◦ Astrological Precession: The relation of the sun to the constellations has changed over the thousands of years since they were first documented, but astrological signs (Scorpio, Capricorn, Taurus, etc.) have not changedRene Blondlot's study of N Rays fell victim to almost all of the characteristics of pseudoscience. Blondlot gave disproportionate weight to subjective data to support his hypothesis. He was unwilling to look closely at data, disposing of any contradicting evidence, and used an irrefutable hypothesis, claiming that those who disagreed with his evidence simply did not have eyes sensitive enough to see the effect of the N Rays.Why Study Pseudoscience?- Responsibility to inform the public- Psychological issues- Danger of pseudoscientific beliefsExamples: ▪ 2013: New Guinea; woman stripped, bound, and burned for witchcraf▪ 2014: Seattle; man kidnaps two homosexual men, slays themTruth and Relativity (September 16)Relativism- There is no objective truth- All positions are valid- Truth is relative to circumstance, culture, group, etc. - Thought to be a more open viewpoint than absolutismAbsolutism- There is absolute truth- All is true or false, not relative- Sometimes confused with realismWhy is relativism attractive? Why do people like this position over absolutism or realism?General class consensus: Relativism is right because no one is wrong.- Relativism is liberating; the world may not have to be a certain way. - Relativism does away with the absolute4Example: The relationship between gender and scientific achievement is not ordination from biology. Women are able to succeed in scientific fields, despite stereotypes of being over-emotional, intuition based creatures.- Congenial, embraces multiculturalism; the differences between cultures are valid in theirown cultural contextExample: Female Genital Mutilation- “Auto-validating” - you are never wrongWhat are potential problems?If all truths


View Full Document

UNT BEHV 3200 - Exam 1 Study Guide

Type: Study Guide
Pages: 5
Documents in this Course
Load more
Download Exam 1 Study Guide
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Exam 1 Study Guide and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Exam 1 Study Guide 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?