DOC PREVIEW
UA PHYS 241 - Electric Field Mapping

This preview shows page 1-2-3 out of 9 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 9 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 9 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 9 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 9 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Physics 241 Lab: Electric Field Mapping http://bohr.physics.arizona.edu/~leone/ua/ua_spring_2010/phys241lab.html Name:____________________________ Section 1: 1.1. One view of particle dynamics is to think about how a particle responds to the forces exerted on it (the vector force field). Another equally valid point of view is to may think of how a particle responds to the potential energy landscape that surrounds it (the scalar energy field). An example of how particles move in one dimension is shown below. Imagine that some external force creates the “hilly” potential energy graph shown, and that four particles are placed at locations A through D. The particle at A is at a minimum of the potential energy curve so that if it is moved, the particle will rise in potential energy. Therefore, the particle at A remains at rest. The particle at B sits at a part of the potential energy curve that has a positive slope. If it moves to the left, it can lower its potential energy. Therefore, the particle at B feels a force pushing it to the left. The particle at C sits at a precarious position. The slope of the potential energy curve at C is zero so that the particle feels no force. However, any small perturbation in the particles position will cause it to “tumble” from its unstable equilibrium. The particle at D has been placed where the slope of the potential energy curve is negative. If the particle moves to the right, it will lower its potential energy. Therefore, the particle at D feels a force pushing it to the right. Notice that the magnitude of the slope at B is greater than at D. Thus the particle at B does not have to move as far to lower its energy as the particle at D. This corresponds to the particle at B feeling a stronger force than the particle at D. The big idea here is that given a graph of potential energy, you can find the corresponding force at each location by realizing that Force equals the negative slope of the potential energy, ! r F (x) = "dU(x)dxˆ x . If a potential energy is given as ! U(x) =12k x " 2( )2 where ! k = 3 [J/m2], what is the force from this potential energy on a particle placed at x = 1 m? At which positions is the force zero? Your calculations and answers in SI units:1.2. The previous technique may be applied to motion in more than one direction: In this situation, the particle can move in the x and y directions. The potential energy landscape shows a single unstable equilibrium (“mountaintop”). Dotted lines have been drawn to show where the potential energy is constant. These are called equipotential lines. If this were a topographical map, these lines would represent constant height (called contours), and mountaineers maneuvering around the mountain at a constant height would be “contouring”. The force on the particle “down the mountain” is always perpendicular to the equipotential lines. Again the force will equal the negative slope of the potential energy graph, but how do you describe a two-dimensional slope? The answer is that the slope will be a two-dimensional vector (so is the force!), which can be found using partial derivatives: ! r F (x, y) ="#U(x, y)#xˆ x +"#U(x, y)#yˆ y . This equation makes intuitive sense. If you want the component of the force in the x-direction, find out how much the potential energy is changing in the x-direction using the partial x-derivative. If a potential energy is given as ! U(x, y) = k 2x2+ xy + 3xy2( ) where ! k = 1 [N/m], what is the force in the x-direction from this potential energy on a particle placed at ! x = 2 m and ! y = 0 m? Your calculations and answer in SI units:1.3. When charge is placed on a conductor, the excess charge creates an electric (vector) field around it. If a test charge q is place in this electric field, the test charge feels an electric force ! r F = qr E . Another equally valid point of view is that the charged conductor creates an electric potential landscape (a scalar field): Just as the force was the slope of the potential energy graph, the electric field is the slope of the electric potential graph: ! r E (x, y) ="#V (x, y)#xˆ x +"#V (x, y)#yˆ y or ! r E ="#V#xˆ x ,"#V#yˆ y $ % & ' ( ) . In a laboratory, one approximates derivatives with finite difference measurements: ! r E (x, y) "#$V (x, y)$xˆ x +#$V (x, y)$yˆ y =#(V (x + $x, y) # V (x, y)$xˆ x +#(V (x, y + $y) # V (x, y))$yˆ y This means that you can approximate the electric field at a point in space by using a DMM to measure the negative change in the voltage in each direction divided by the distance of your measurement. These ideas are easily extended to three dimensions: ! r F (x, y,z) ="#U(x, y,z)#xˆ x +"#U(x, y,z)#yˆ y +"#U(x, y,z)#zˆ z c (mathematically identical)r E (x, y,z) ="#V (x, y,z)#xˆ x +"#V (x, y,z)#yˆ y +"#V (x, y,z)#zˆ z 1.4. In this lab, we will be working with two-dimensional electric vector fields (using conducting paper), but we will keep are graphs of the electric field and equipotentials restricted to two-dimensions by “looking at the mountain from above”. This “aerial view” will make it easier to make graphs, but don’t forget the underlying principles!Section 2: Some people find the above picture useful for connecting the various electrostatic concepts together and even add to it as they learn more. 2.1 In the above schematic, a formula is given for the electric field. For what physical situation is this formula correct/useful? Your answer: For what other physical system(s) would the electric field be best found using a different formula or mathematical technique? Your answer: Many introductory students often only know one method/formula for finding E and get stumped on their exams!Section 3: 3.1. In the following picture depicting equipotential lines (dashed lines of constant voltage), sketch the corresponding electric field lines (draw the electric field lines with solid lines). Be sure to label the direction of the electric field lines using arrows using the assumption that VOUT < VIN. Note that Vout gives the value of the voltage for the entire dotted line it touches (similarly for Vin). Think topographical maps! Draw on the picture below. In the following picture assume VOUT < VIN. Describe


View Full Document

UA PHYS 241 - Electric Field Mapping

Documents in this Course
Notes

Notes

14 pages

Exam 1

Exam 1

63 pages

Motors

Motors

15 pages

Motors

Motors

16 pages

Load more
Download Electric Field Mapping
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Electric Field Mapping and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Electric Field Mapping 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?