DOC PREVIEW
UW-Madison ECON 522 - Lecture 9

This preview shows page 1-2-3-23-24-25-26-47-48-49 out of 49 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 49 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 49 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 49 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 49 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 49 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 49 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 49 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 49 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 49 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 49 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 49 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Econ 522 Economics of LawRemindersLast week, applications/examples of property law…Today: two important limitations on property rights imposed by governmentSlide 4TakingsSlide 7Slide 8Slide 9Slide 10Slide 11Slide 12Poletown Neighborhood Council v DetroitSlide 14Slide 14Multiple forms of public ownershipThird form of public ownership: political control/regulationSlide 18Similar to how Iceland maintains fishing stockRegulationRegulation: Pennsylvania Coal v. MahonSlide 22Slide 23Slide 24Blume and Rubinfeld, “Compensation for Takings: An Economic Analysis”Slide 26More on regulationSlide 28Slide 29Property law: the big-picture questionWhy do we need contracts?Slide 32Example: the agency (trust) game(One solution: reputation)Another solution: legally binding promisesSo… what types of promises should be enforced by the law?Slide 36The bargain theory of contractsWhat is consideration?Slide 40The bargain theory does not distinguish between fair and unfair bargainsUnder the bargain theory, what is the remedy?Problems with the bargain theorySlide 44Slide 44What promises should be enforced?Slide 47Slide 48So now we know…Econ 522Economics of LawDan QuintSpring 2011Lecture 92Second homework due ThursdayFirst midterm next Wednesday (March 2)Reminders3What things can be privately owned?Intellectual Property – patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secretsWhat can/can’t an owner do with his/her property?Restraints on alienation, unbundling, inalienabilityHow are property rights established?First Possession versus Tied OwnershipAdverse PossessionWhat remedies are given?Injunctions vs damages; temporary vs permanent damagesPrivate necessity (emergency) as exception to property protectionLast week, applications/examples of property law…4Government can limit how you use your propertyRegulationThe government can take your property“Eminent domain”Today: two important limitations on property rights imposed by government5Takings6Public goods privately provided  undersupplyOne role of government: provide public goodsDefense, roads and infrastructure, public parks, art, science…To do this, government may need land…which might already belong to someone elseIn most countries, government has right of eminent domainRight to seize private property when the owner doesn’t want to sellThis type of seizure also called a takingTakings7U.S. Constitution, Fifth Amendment:“…nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”Government can only seize private property for public useAnd only with just compensationConsistently interpreted to mean fair market value – what the owner would likely have been able to sell the property forTakings8Why allow takings?Takings9Why allow takings?Why these limitations?why require compensation?Takings10Why allow takings?Why these limitations?why require compensation?Takings$3 MM $1 MM$9 MM$10 MM11Why allow takings?Why these limitations?why require compensation?why only for public use?Takings12Why allow takings?Why these limitations?why require compensation?why only for public use?The government should only take private property (with compensation) to provide a public good when transaction costs preclude purchasing the necessary property through voluntary negotiationsTakings131981: GM was threatening to close Detroit plantWould cost city 6,000 jobs, millions in tax revenueCity used eminent domain to condemn entire neighborhood1,000 homeowners and 100 businesses forced to sellland then used for upgraded plant for GMcity claimed employment and tax revenues were public goods, which justified use of eminent domainMich Sup Ct: “Alleviating unemployment and revitalizing the economic base of the community” valid public purposes; “the benefit to a private interest is merely incidental”Overturned in 2004 ruling (Wayne v Hathcock)Similar case, Kelo v. City of New London (2005 US Sup Ct)Poletown Neighborhood Council v Detroit141981: GM was threatening to close Detroit plantWould cost city 6,000 jobs, millions in tax revenueCity used eminent domain to condemn entire neighborhood1,000 homeowners and 100 businesses forced to sellland then used for upgraded plant for GMcity claimed employment and tax revenues were public goods, which justified use of eminent domainMich Sup Ct: “Alleviating unemployment and revitalizing the economic base of the community” valid public purposes; “the benefit to a private interest is merely incidental”Overturned in 2004 ruling (Wayne v Hathcock)Similar case, Kelo v. City of New London (2005 US Sup Ct)Poletown Neighborhood Council v Detroit15Regulation16Open AccessAnyone free to use the resourceLeads to overutilization (Tragedy of the Commons)Example: oyster bedsUnanimous ConsentOpposite of open access – multiple owners must all agree to any use of the resourceLeads to underutilizationExample: empty storefronts in post-Communist MoscowPolitical Control/RegulationMultiple forms of public ownership17Dividing the mountain pasture among individual owners would require fencing it, which is prohibitively expensive.Instead, the highland pasture is held in common, with each village owning different pastures that are separated by natural features such as lakes and mountain peaks.If each person in the village could place as many sheep as he or she wanted in the common pasture, the meadows might be destroyed and eroded by overuse.Third form of public ownership: political control/regulation18In fact, the common pastures in the mountains of Iceland have not been overused and destroyed, because the villages have effective systems of governance.They have adopted rules to protect and preserve the common pasture. The sheep are grazed in common pasture in the mountains during the summer and then returned to individual farms in the valleys during the winter.The total number of sheep allowed in the mountain pasture during the summer is adjusted to its carrying capacity.Each member of the village receives a share of the total in proportion to the amount of farmland where he or she raises hay to feed the sheep in the winter.Third form of public ownership: political control/regulation19Open access would lead to overfishing, deplete fishing stockGovernment of Iceland decides how much fish should


View Full Document

UW-Madison ECON 522 - Lecture 9

Documents in this Course
Lecture 4

Lecture 4

46 pages

Lecture 5

Lecture 5

31 pages

Lecture 7

Lecture 7

39 pages

Lecture 9

Lecture 9

24 pages

Lecture 7

Lecture 7

13 pages

Lecture 6

Lecture 6

14 pages

Logistics

Logistics

35 pages

Logistics

Logistics

41 pages

Logistics

Logistics

36 pages

Lecture 8

Lecture 8

21 pages

Lecture 8

Lecture 8

47 pages

Lecture 6

Lecture 6

46 pages

Logistics

Logistics

49 pages

Load more
Download Lecture 9
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Lecture 9 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Lecture 9 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?