VI 1 The distance between point B and point F was 84 8 cm H 105 5 cm S 33 5 cm s 0 1 cm m 30o m 33o m 30o 30 30 30 30 30 35 35 35 35 35 40 40 40 40 40 45 45 45 45 45 50 50 50 50 50 55 55 55 55 55 60 60 60 60 60 65 65 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 5 3 1 3 4 3 7 3 7 3 8 8 1 8 5 8 6 8 7 8 5 13 8 14 0 14 0 14 2 14 4 20 7 20 8 21 1 21 3 21 5 29 4 29 5 29 6 30 0 29 4 39 0 37 9 38 1 38 1 38 7 46 0 49 6 0 0 01 0 00667 0 003333 0 016667 0 088571 0 097143 0 105714 0 105714 0 108571 0 2025 0 2125 0 215 0 2175 0 2125 0 306667 0 311111 0 311111 0 315556 0 32 0 414 0 416 0 422 0 426 0 43 0 534545 0 536364 0 538182 0 545455 0 534545 0 65 0 631667 0 635 0 635 0 645 0 707692 0 763077 50 9 51 3 52 6 0 783077 0 789231 0 809231 65 65 65 VI 2 h D vs D f x 0 02 x 0 66 D h 0 9 0 8 0 7 0 6 0 5 0 4 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 25 0 1 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 D It does not surprise be that the fact that the line is linear because I expected it VI 3 S 0 021756386 s 0 0002 b 0 65844 b 0 01 b tan 0 65844 tan 0 65844 tan tan 1 0 65844 33 363o 0 6 This value is very similar to the one we measured with the protractor so I am not surprised by the value g 2 Scos2 9 81 9 81 9 81 2 2 1756386 cos2 30 2 2 1756386 cos2 33 2 2 1756386 cos2 30 VI 4 V0 V0 V0 V0 V0 1 73 V0 1 79 V0 1 73 v 02 VI 5 V0 2sg V0 2 56 VI 6 V0 2 0 335 9 81 The value is not within the range of uncertainty which can be explained as the value calculate for and not tested for does not take into account friction or rotation induced when the ball was dropped It does not agree with the value calculated