FSU INR 3003 - Mearsheimer, “Anarchy and the Struggle for Power”

Unformatted text preview:

Mearsheimer Anarchy and the Struggle for Power INR 3003 Reading Notes Carina Tenaglia Fall 2014 Week 1 Intro I a Argument states inhabit a zero sum world of competition over power b Globalization new era of int l politics c Offensive Realism theory i States want more power for protection to advance interests Why States Pursue Power II a Rejects Milton Friedman s view best theories have most unrealistic assumptions Bedrock Assumptions III a Assumptions i Int l system anarchic 1 Independent states w o authority above them ii Some offensive military capability iii Uncertainty of other states intentions iv Survival primary goal 1 Territorial integrity domestic political order autonomy v Great powers are rational actors 1 Consider other states b Patterns of behavior fear self help power maximization State Behavior a Powers fear each other i German reunification sparked fear through UK France powers ii 911 problem No central authority states can turn to for help 1 No method to punish aggressors b Political antagonism high stakes losses 1 Alliances temporary marriages of convenience ii States serve self interests iii One state s gain another s loss Zero Sum mentality 1 Pursuit for power stops when Hegemony achieved c The Security Dilemma i The measure a state takes to increase its own security decrease that of other states offensive realism ii The best defense is a good offense Calculated Aggression a States want to gain power but won t do so if cost is too high b Clint Eastwood a state has to know its limitations to survive in the int l system c Miscalculations i Judgments made from imperfect information 1 Adversaries have incentive to misrepresent strength aims 2 Aggressors exaggerate peaceful intentions military weakness so victim doesn t build up arms leave state vulnerable to attack Hitler ii Weaponry use in combat is different than training iii Uncertain of resolve of opponent states IV V VI VII Week 2 Mearsheimer Why We Will Soon Miss the Cold War 1990 I 1 Germany expected UK to stay out of WWI Hussein expected US to stay out of Kuwait invasion d Defensive realist arguments i Threatened states balance aggressors ultimately crush them ii Offense defense balance usually tilted towards defense making conquest especially difficult e Conquests between 1815 1980 i Initiator aggressor won about 60 of the time Hegemony s Limits a Hegemon only great power in system i Mid 19th century UK not hegemon b c other regional powers b Global v Regional hegemon i There s never been a global hegemon unlikely to be one soon ii Regional Hegemon US is most notorious long lasting 1 US offshore balancer 2 Measures to deal w threatening states from sidelines c Ideal situation i Only regional hegemon in world Conclusion a Structure of int l system causes states to act offensively to achieve hegemony b Other motive survival Intro a Mearsheimer believes that multi polarism is resurfacing in Europe and will lead to future hostilities i Argument distribution and character of military power among states are the root causes of war and peace ii Realist perspective 1 Euro peace since 1945 a Bipolar destruction of military power on continent b Rough military equality btw both powers US USSR c Each power armed w large nuclear arsenal 2 Multi polar distribution similar to era dating back to Peace of Westphalia 1648 until 1945 a Plagued w war during this era b Armed conflict is bred by untamed anarchy c Quotes John Lewis Gaddis comparison of Cold War to Long Peace A Hard Theory of Peace a Causes of violence pre 1945 i European multipolar distribution of power 1 France Germany Great Britain GB Austria Hungary Russia ii Strength imbalance states fight for power 1 Deterrence more difficult to maintain w multiple dyads a Power asymmetries develop b War higher prospect for victory than in bi polar system II b Bipolar System i Example US v USSR ii More peaceful allegiance from smaller powers in each region 1 Constructs more equal rigid alliance structures 2 Deterrence easier with only one dyad pairing a Small gaps foster peace large gaps promote war b More costly war less likely to take risk i Nuclear weapons reason for peace ii More useful for self defense than aggression c Hypernationalism i Belief that other nation states are both inferior threatening 1 Threat that finds itself in military systems relying on mass armies 2 Nuclear weapons deter this a Shift from mass armies toward small high tech organizations d Cold War characteristics frowned upon by masses i Military equality investment for weapons that were never used e Multipolar future i Germany France Britain perhaps Italy 1 3 possible future scenarios The Europe Without Nuclear Weapons Scenario a Without nuclear weapons peace more unlikely b c war not as costly i Russia Germany most likely Europe superpowers w o nuclear weapons ii Russia leader Washington Summit claimed that Russia Germany mixture from 1930 s 1 Humiliation of great power 2 Economic troubles 3 Rise of Nationalism iii Ethnic Conflicts 1 Tensions in Hungary Romania over Hungarian minority in Transylvania 2 Yugoslavia Albania dispute over Kosovo Yugo Region w Albanian majority a Bulgaria v Yugoslavia over Macedonia b Turkey v Bulgaria over treatment of its Turkish minority iv Poland Czechoslovakia border dispute b Germany v Soviet Union i Soviets defeating Germany 1 Soviet union pulled apart by centrifugal forces German victory ii Soviets Germany roughly equal strengths The Current Ownership Scenario a Britain France Soviet Union retain weapons but no new nuclear powers i Unlikely 1 Germany won t allow others to defend it 2 Small states have incentive to acquire them to protect from blackmail by superpowers The Nuclear Proliferation Scenario a Most probable scenario i Mismanaged proliferation disaster III IV V VI VII 1 Incentive to stop non nuclear neighbor from becoming nuclear a Ex Israel trying to stop Iraq b Increased risk of competition or firing by accident terrorists 2 More likely than well managed proliferation a Incentive to defect b c of insecurity b States will not share military secrets c Would undermine 1968 Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty ii Well managed proliferation order similar to Long Peace Is War Obsolete a In regards to Europe Without Nuclear Weapons Scenario i Highly optimistic unlikely ii Obsolescence of War Theory supports this 1 If cost of war seemed too great why was there a 2nd world war iii Public opinion on nat l security issues fickle manipulated by elites Is


View Full Document

FSU INR 3003 - Mearsheimer, “Anarchy and the Struggle for Power”

Documents in this Course
Democracy

Democracy

27 pages

Democracy

Democracy

55 pages

Democracy

Democracy

52 pages

Realism

Realism

21 pages

Democracy

Democracy

28 pages

Exam 2

Exam 2

20 pages

Exam 2

Exam 2

20 pages

Exam 2

Exam 2

20 pages

Exam 2

Exam 2

20 pages

Democracy

Democracy

52 pages

Exam 1

Exam 1

22 pages

Democracy

Democracy

14 pages

Democracy

Democracy

32 pages

Exam 1

Exam 1

20 pages

Exam 2

Exam 2

20 pages

Democracy

Democracy

55 pages

Exam 3

Exam 3

31 pages

Exam 2

Exam 2

18 pages

Democracy

Democracy

39 pages

Democracy

Democracy

39 pages

Test 2

Test 2

47 pages

Democracy

Democracy

39 pages

Notes

Notes

25 pages

Test 2

Test 2

47 pages

Democracy

Democracy

25 pages

Democracy

Democracy

32 pages

Democracy

Democracy

32 pages

Exam #1

Exam #1

12 pages

Democracy

Democracy

39 pages

Exam 2

Exam 2

20 pages

Notes

Notes

5 pages

Load more
Download Mearsheimer, “Anarchy and the Struggle for Power”
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Mearsheimer, “Anarchy and the Struggle for Power” and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Mearsheimer, “Anarchy and the Struggle for Power” 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?