Phil 1010 FINAL EXAM Fall 2010Put ALL of your answers on this ANSWER SHEET. No other answers will be counted! Every question is worth two points, except the final question which is worth 10 points.NAME_____________________________(1 pt) Class Day & Time___________________(1 pt)___ 1. _____________________ 16.___ 2. _____________________ 17.___ 3. ___ 18.___ 4. ___ 19.___ 5. ___ 20.___ 6. ___ 21. ___ 7. ___ 22.___ 8. ___ 23___ 9. ___ 24___ 10. ___ 25.___ 11. ___ 26.___ 12. ___ 27.___ 13. ___ 28._________14. ___ 29___________________ 15.►►►►turn over130. Premise (1)______________________________________________31. Conclusion (2)____________________________________________32. Premise (1)_______________________________________________And _________________________________________33. Premise (2)_______________________________________________34. Conclusion (3)_____________________________________________35. P%_____________________36. F_________________________37. Sample________________________________________________38. Target_________________________________________________39. Analogue_____________________________________________40. Primary Subject _______________________________________41. Conclusory Feature_____________________________________42. E1 ________________________________ and E2______________________________________43. _____________________________________________________________________________44. _____________________________________________________________________________45—49 (ten points, use the space on this page ONLY)2Proper Form TestTrue Premises TestYou should evaluate each premise separately according to the standard TP test criteria. Make sure you consider the audience of the argument. Also consider whether the statement is empirical, definitional, or expert testimony, and evaluate accordingly. PremiseTrue orfalseRationale for decision(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)Phil 1010 Final Exam Fall 20103ArgumentsPass or failPF test?Rationale for decisionMain argumentREMINDER: Put all of your answers on the answer sheet above. No answers on any other part of the testincluding the following will be counted. I. Multiple Choice (each worth 2 points)A. Identify types of statements in Questions 1—5 from the following options. A. Simple Statement B. Negation C. Conjunction D. Disjunction E. Conditional F. None of the above1. “This is a very exciting fall at Georgia State University.” – Mark P. Becker, President, GSU, “Expanding Horizons,” in GSU Magazine, Fall 2010, p. 2.2. “On October 15, I was honored to join Xiliang Cui, president of the Beijing Language and Cultural University, and Yanping Gao, Consul General of the People’s Republic of China, in the official dedication at GSU’s Rialto Center for the Arts.” – Mark P. Becker, President, GSU, “Expanding Horizons,” in GSU Magazine, Fall 2010, p. 2.3. “If Iraqi nuclear weapons or terrorist ties were the real problem, then the United States could have spent moreon missile defenses, port and border security, and other aspects of homeland security.” – John S. Duffield, professor of Political Science, GSU, “Are We Safer Now?” in GSU magazine, Fall 2010, p. 9.4. Citizens must have a vote or be excused from taxes.5. “The law combines power and morality, stability and change, systemic or doctrinal coherence and equitable sensitivity to individual cases, among others.”- Joseph Raz, Between Authority and Interpretation, Oxford University Press, 2009, p.1.B. Identifying Deductive Syllogisms.Read the following arguments and choose the BEST response. Focus on the italicized portion of the passages.Background: Last month, whistle blowing giant, WikiLeaks, founded by Julian Assange, released over 390,000 reports from the U.S. Army on the war in Iraq from 2004 to 2009. Allegations of human rights violations were contained in the reports. People disagree about whether the documents should or should not be released to the public. Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) argues that:“We need a true accounting of the war in Iraq [which can only be done by thorough investigation of every US agency involved]. The American people have a right to know how many innocent civilians were killed in a war based on lies. It is sincerely incredible to fathom that such huge amounts of pertinent information were kept purposely hidden from the public and, more importantly, the country that we have sworn to protect. Every agency of the U.S. government involved needs to be thoroughly investigated, for even the most minor of crimes must be reported if our military wishes to retain a singular ounce of respectability in the global political climate.” –background and quote from Congressman Kucinich taken from, Paul DeMerritt,“Mammoth Leak Reveals American War Crimes.” GSU Signal, November 3, 2010, p. 17.46. Suppose we standardized the claims as follows:S1 = the U.S. military wishes to retain its respectabilityS2 = every federal agency involved needs to be thoroughly investigated (to give atrue accounting of the war in Iraq)Which of the following forms would best represent Congressman Kucinich’s argument above?A. (1) If S1, then S2 B. (1) If S1, then S2[2] S1, [2] Not S1,Tf, (3) S2 Tf, (3) Not S2C. (1) If S1, then S2 D. (1) If S1, then S2(2) Not S2, (2) S2,Tf, (3) Not S1 Tf, (3) S17. What form does Congressman Kucinich’s argument take (that is standardized in Question #6)?A. Inductive argument B. Deductive argumentC. Cogent Argument D. None of the above8. What would be the best evaluation of the argument standardized in Question #6?A. Deductive argument that passes the Proper Form testB. Inductive argument that passes the Proper Form testC. Deductive argument that fails the Proper Form testD. Inductive argument that fails the Proper Form testE. None of the aboveC. Identify Elements of an Analogical Argument. Pay particular attention to the italicized portions.“A few weeks ago, the media spent about 10 minutes discussing a new proposal by the Obama administration that would require telecommunications carriers to install special government-only "backdoors" permitting the decryption of many different kinds of electronic communications. . . I have no objection to a law that makes it easier for the government to track down murderers, drug dealers and white-collar criminals. . . . .. But experience has taught us that government employees are no less susceptible to temptation than the rest of us and the sheer scope of