FATHERS OF BIOLOGY BY CHARLES McRAE M A F L S FORMERLY SCHOLAR OF EXETER COLLEGE OXFORD PERCIVAL CO KING STREET COVENT GARDEN London 1890 Transcriber s Note Minor typographical errors have been corrected without note Archaic and variant spellings remain as originally printed Greek text appears as originally printed but with a mouse hover transliteration PREFACE It is hoped that the account given in the following pages of the lives of five great naturalists may not be found devoid of interest The work of each one of them marked a definite advance in the science of Biology There is often among students of anatomy and physiology a tendency to imagine that the facts with which they are now being made familiar have all been established by recent observation and experiment But even the slight knowledge of the history of Biology which may be obtained from a perusal of this little book will show that so far from such being the case this branch of science is of venerable antiquity And further if in the place of this misconception a desire is aroused in the reader for a fuller acquaintance with the writings of the early anatomists the chief aim of the author will have been fulfilled CONTENTS HIPPOCRATES ARISTOTLE GALEN VESALIUS HARVEY PAGE 1 19 45 63 83 HIPPOCRATES HIPPOCRATES Owing to the lapse of centuries very little is known with certainty of the life of Hippocrates who was called with affectionate veneration by his successors the divine old man and who has been justly known to posterity as the Father of Medicine He was probably born about 470 b c and according to all accounts appears to have reached the advanced age of ninety years or more He must therefore have lived during a period of Greek history which was characterized by great intellectual activity for he had as his contemporaries Pericles the famous statesman the poets schylus Sophocles Euripides Aristophanes and Pindar the philosopher Socrates with his disciples Xenophon and Plato the historians Herodotus and Thucydides and Phidias the unrivalled sculptor In the island of Cos where he was born stood one of the most celebrated of the temples of sculapius and in this temple because he was descended from the Asclepiad Hippocrates inherited from his forefathers an important position Among the Asclepiads the habit of physical observation and even manual training in dissection were imparted traditionally from father to son from the earliest years thus serving as a preparation for medical practice when there were no written treatises to study 1 Although Hippocrates at first studied medicine under his father he had afterwards for his teachers Gorgias and Democritus both of classic fame and Herodicus who is known as the first person who applied gymnastic exercises to the cure of diseases The Asclepions or temples of health were erected in various parts of Greece as receptacles for invalids who were in the habit of resorting to them to seek the assistance of the god These temples were mostly situated in the neighbourhood of medicinal springs and each devotee at his entrance was made to undergo a regular course of bathing and purification Probably his diet was also carefully attended to and at the same time his imagination was worked upon by music and religious ceremonies On his departure the restored patient usually showed his gratitude by presenting to the temple votive tablets setting forth the circumstances of his peculiar case The value of these to men about to enter on medical studies can be readily understood and it was to such treasures of recorded observations collected during several generations that Hippocrates had access from the commencement of his career Owing to the peculiar constitution of the Asclepions medical and priestly pursuits had before the time of Hippocrates become combined and consequently although rational means were to a certain extent applied to the cure of diseases the more common practice was to resort chiefly to superstitious modes of working upon the imagination It is not surprising therefore to find that every sickness especially epidemics and plagues were attributed to the anger of some offended god and that penance and supplications often took the place of personal and domestic cleanliness fresh air and light It was Hippocrates who emancipated medicine from the thraldom of superstition and in this way wrested the practice of his art from the monopoly of the priests In his treatise on The Sacred Disease possibly epilepsy he discusses the controverted question whether or not this disease was an infliction from the gods and he decidedly maintains that there is no such a thing as a sacred disease for all diseases arise from natural causes and no one can be ascribed to the gods more than another He points out that it is simply because this disease is unlike other diseases that men have come to regard its cause as divine and yet it is not really more wonderful than the paroxysms of fevers and many other diseases not thought sacred He exposes the cunning of the impostors who pretend to cure men by purifications and spells who give themselves out as being excessively religious and as knowing more than other people and he argues that whoever is able by purifications and conjurings to drive away such an affection will be able by other practices to excite it and according to this view its divine nature is entirely done away with Neither truly he continues do I count it a worthy opinion to hold that the body of a man is polluted by the divinity the most impure by the most holy for were it defiled or did it suffer from any other thing it would be like to be purified and sanctified rather than polluted by the divinity As an additional argument against the cause being divine he adduces the fact that this disease is hereditary like other diseases and that it attacks persons of a peculiar temperament namely the phlegmatic but not the bilious and yet if it were really more divine than the others he justly adds it ought to befall all alike Again speaking of a disease common among the Scythians Hippocrates remarks that the people attributed it to a god but that to me it appears that such affections are just as much divine as all others are and that no one disease is either more divine or more human than another but that all are alike divine for that each has its own nature and that no one arises without a natural cause From this it will be seen that Hippocrates regarded all phenomena as at once divine and