FSU ANT 2511 - CHAPTER 12 – THE GENUS HOMO AND STONE TOOLS

Unformatted text preview:

CHAPTER 12 – THE GENUS HOMO AND STONE TOOLS1st appearance of Genus homo = 2.5 mya during periods of cyclic glaciationCharacteristics of Genus homo =Smaller teethMore efficient bipedalismTool use ??Less projecting face; larger, more rounded brain case1.) Homo habilis (1.9-1.6 mya)Ways similar to Homo =(1) bigger brain(2) smaller teeth with thinner enamel  parabolic dental arcade; rounded skull; reduced jaw musclesWood & Collard = put H. habilis with australopithecines because they say other Homo are fully terrestrial, larger, < dimorphismEARLY TOOL USEOldowan Industry 2.5 myaH. habilis/A. garhi carried toolsCores/flakes (sharp, cutting edger) (Mode 1 technique)HammerstonesBeginnings of archaeology – quarrying sites, home bases foundTaphonomy – how sites are created (preservation, fossilization, etc)Teeth = smooth grooves; flakes = serrated groovesLower Paleolithic Industry = Oldowan and Acheulean traditionFlakes, cleavers, hand axe, bifaced, standardized, Movius line (bamboo) etc.Hand axes = used to butcher large animals, stripping tree bark, digging, etc.in East Asia, H. erectus used bamboo (Movius Line)Only mode 1 tools, no mode 2Reasons for African Exodus = search for resources; generalized diet allowed adaptation to new environment; no competition in new environments (?); population expansion; etc.Possible fire use = 1.6-1.5 mya ??2.) Homo erectus (1.6 mya)Shorter arms, longer legs (like us); narrow hips, shoulders (like us)Brain size = 700-1200 cc (much larger brains than australopiths)Heavily muscledMajor features = increased brain size***, angular vault, cranial superstructuresH. erectus and H. ergaster very similar but erectus = thicker skull, bigger brow ridge, sagittal keel, more pronounced occipital torusAncestral traits = narrow behind eyes, receding forehead, no chinDerived traits (shared with us) = Less prognathic face, smaller jaws & teeth, larger bodyDerived traits (NOT shared with us) = occipital torus, large brow ridgesNo nerves to control breathing during speech = no language (?)3.) H. floresiensis “Hobbit” (800 kya)380 cc = brain size7 individuals found, measured at about 3 ft tallPossibly dwarfed H. erectus? Island environment linked to dwarfismUsed Mode 1 tools (flakes, etc.)  made tools and hunted large gameANT2511: INTRODUCTION TO PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGYCHAPTER 12 – THE GENUS HOMO AND STONE TOOLS1st appearance of Genus homo = 2.5 mya during periods of cyclic glaciation Characteristics of Genus homo = - Smaller teeth- More efficient bipedalism - Tool use ?? - Less projecting face; larger, more rounded brain case 1.) Homo habilis (1.9-1.6 mya) - Ways similar to Homo = o (1) bigger braino (2) smaller teeth with thinner enamel  parabolic dental arcade; rounded skull; reduced jaw muscles- Wood & Collard = put H. habilis with australopithecines because they say other Homo are fully terrestrial, larger, < dimorphism EARLY TOOL USE Oldowan Industry 2.5 mya- H. habilis/A. garhi carried toolso Cores/flakes (sharp, cutting edger) (Mode 1 technique) o Hammerstones- Beginnings of archaeology – quarrying sites, home bases found- Taphonomy – how sites are created (preservation, fossilization, etc)- Teeth = smooth grooves; flakes = serrated groovesLower Paleolithic Industry = Oldowan and Acheulean traditionANT2511: INTRODUCTION TO PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY- Flakes, cleavers, hand axe, bifaced, standardized, Movius line (bamboo) etc. - Hand axes = used to butcher large animals, stripping tree bark, digging, etc. - in East Asia, H. erectus used bamboo (Movius Line) o Only mode 1 tools, no mode 2 Reasons for African Exodus = search for resources; generalized diet allowed adaptation to new environment; no competition in new environments (?); population expansion; etc. Possible fire use = 1.6-1.5 mya ?? 2.) Homo erectus (1.6 mya) - Shorter arms, longer legs (like us); narrow hips, shoulders (like us)- Brain size = 700-1200 cc (much larger brains than australopiths) - Heavily muscled- Major features = increased brain size***, angular vault, cranial superstructures- H. erectus and H. ergaster very similar but erectus = thicker skull, bigger brow ridge, sagittal keel, more pronounced occipital torus- Ancestral traits = narrow behind eyes, receding forehead, no chin- Derived traits (shared with us) = Less prognathic face, smaller jaws & teeth, larger body - Derived traits (NOT shared with us) = occipital torus, large brow ridges - No nerves to control breathing during speech = no language (?)3.) H. floresiensis “Hobbit” (800 kya) - 380 cc = brain size - 7 individuals found, measured at about 3 ft tall - Possibly dwarfed H. erectus? Island environment linked to dwarfism- Used Mode 1 tools (flakes, etc.)  made tools and hunted large game KNOW THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE TYPES OF TOOL INDUSTRY FOR EXAMS – Oldowan vs. Achulean, etc. Test Questions =  Are Oldowan tools (2.5 mya) very proficient at butchering animals? Yes.ANT2511: INTRODUCTION TO PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY Why is Homo erectus shown as terrestrial? Because it had same body proportions as modern people who live in tropical


View Full Document

FSU ANT 2511 - CHAPTER 12 – THE GENUS HOMO AND STONE TOOLS

Download CHAPTER 12 – THE GENUS HOMO AND STONE TOOLS
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view CHAPTER 12 – THE GENUS HOMO AND STONE TOOLS and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view CHAPTER 12 – THE GENUS HOMO AND STONE TOOLS 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?