• The state shouldn't make policies based on a certain conceived notion of a good.• Harm principle is only concerned with the instrumentality of freedom. • The neutrality principle is more specific in that• The value of neutrality argument has to give off trade offs• Things must be chosen the right way, even the good things are only good if people choose them based on why they are better• Being really good at something is better than being mediocre.• If the state deviates from neutrality than it undermines the idea that people will choose a healthy lifestyle autonomously• There is an idea that if people are brought up through coercion to do the right things, then eventually they may be able to see the positive reasons to do thething they were originally coerced into
View Full Document
Unlocking...