New version page

UNC-Chapel Hill PHIL 154 - Quiz 4 Notes

Previewing page 1


Unformatted text preview:

Need more authors of phil papersSocial scientists should be expected to have normative validCrisp 2013 Well-being (1 and 4)Alexandrova 2016 The science of well-beingDiener and Seligam 2004 Toward and economy of well-beingAlexandrova and Haybron 2016 In construct validation valid?Wodak 2019 what if well-being measurements are non linearPrinzing 2020 positive psychology is value-ladenAlexandrova 2017 ch 4Prinzing How to study well beingGov should use objective list theoriesUniversal basic income-cover needsMeasures shown to be normatively valid- needs to be plausibly a good theory-drawn from plausible theory of well-being not justNeed more authors of phil papersSocial scientists should be expected to have normative validRight source of correlatiins between measure and what its related toConstruct validation-is it measuring what its designed to


View Full Document
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Quiz 4 Notes and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Quiz 4 Notes and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?