New version page

UCI EUROST 10 - Euro Studies Class 18

Upgrade to remove ads

This preview shows page 1-2-3-4 out of 12 pages.

Save
View Full Document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 12 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 12 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 12 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 12 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Upgrade to remove ads
Unformatted text preview:

Professor Smith European Studies Department Europe Studies 10 European History Course Code: 24000 ● Why is enlightenment difficult? ○ Why is it “self-incurred” ○ Because people who are “of age” and should have a voice of their own, don’t ■ Why? ● Laziness and cowardice ● Fear of the unknown that comes from challenging authority ● The “guardians” feed off that fear, laziness, and cowardice and “make it easy” ● The goal ○ “Autonomy” ○ = auto + nomos = self + law ○ To be autonomous is to be capable of “imposing the law upon oneself” ■ Recall his ethics from the 2nd critique: do what’s right because it’s right ○ Hence, to be autonomous is not to be outside of or beyond the law ○ This will lead to an interesting paradox that we will deal with at the end ■ The law is necessary for enlightenment and autonomy ● Paradox? ○ We don’t live in an “enlightenment age” but we do live in an “age of enlightenment” ○ How to resolve this apparent contradiction? ○ Enlightenment is a process ● Progress ○ How does Kant envision social change coming about? ○ Enlightenment not (just) an individual process ○ He gives the example of a religious community ○ Some members (even a clergyman) must be allowed to air differences publicly(in writing) ○ If more people “in the reading public” come to adopt these views through open discussion, then they could approach the “throne” to start a new congregation ○ In political science this is called “deliberative democracy” ○ Note: this is Kant’s way of circumventing wars of religion! ■ “Use reason (publicly) in religious matters” ● Who can be enlightened? ○ Everyone? All to the same degree? ○ Women? ○ I read Kant favorably ■ He has sexist ideas typical of his period● But i think he implies in this essay that the reason why the “entire fair sex” is unenlightened is because the “guardians” have convinced them of the dangers ○ Those guardians need to be challenged ○ Does kant at least raise a claim to universality? ○ Keep these questions in mind when you prepare the magic flute for next tuesday ● A brief aside… ○ Mary Wollstonecraft (1759-1797) ■ A vindication of the Rights of Women (1792) ■ “First great feminist” ■ But she also criticized women for allowing themselves to be cowed by their “guardians” ● Frederick the second (“the great”) Friedrich der Grobe ○ 1712 -1786 ○ “King in Prussia” 1740-1772 (because of scattered territories) ○ “King of Prussia” 1772-1786 ○ The crowning achievement of the Hohenzollern dynasty that led Prussia to become the dominant force in “Germany” ○ He’s the ruler Kant is referring to with his line: ■ “Only one ruler says ● Discuss all you want, but obey” ● Frederick the Great ○ Rise of the notion of the “state” as an entity with its own inner logic/life ■ Not just tied to the individual ruler ● He respected the FRENCH court ○ Raison d’etat ■ The state has its own reason ○ “King is the first servant of the state” ■ A kind of secular version of Lutheranism ● In a sense, man is “unfree” and must serve others ○ In 1739 he published an anti-machiavelli ○ Fusion of state power and rationality ■ A properly run state functions like an efficient “machine” ● We now see the further development of the Westphalian system ○ Recall: The Treaty allowed a country like the France of Louis XIV (the “sun king” to consolidate power) ○ It weakened the holy roman empire by giving more independence to the small principalities in the German-speaking region ○ What we see now is ■ The merging of some of those principalities into a stronger state ■ A new process of “rationalization” ● The “modern nation state” is slowly taking shape ○ Kant seems to be aware of this irony that the modern state is a precondition for enlightenment…○ On the other hand, the state (or its ruler) has the right to expect that it runs smoothly ■ We are cogs in the machine and must obey ○ But on the other, it also must allow us to pursue our academic or “scholarly” interests freely ● Enlightenment is a collective enterprise ○ The solution to the paradox that we do not live in an enlightened age but in an age of enlightenment ■ It is difficult for an individual on his or her own to “step out” of self-incurred tutelage ○ “But that the public should enlighten itself is more possible...” ○ This means we need to explore the possibility of a “public” ● Rise of a “public sphere” ○ Physical space and “literary” space ● Reading public + state = new possibilities for politics ○ Also: jurgen Habermas, the structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of Bourgeois society ○ A basic part of “liberal” societies ■ But are they in danger from the very way those societies have developed? ○ Do we need to protect the possibility of a public sphere? ● Contemporary examples ○ The “occupy” movement ○ Zuccotti Park, New York City ● What, according to this image, is contributing to our “minority status” ● Or a “public sphere elsewhere?” ● For our purposes, we want to explore: ○ How does Kant deal with the issues of reason, the new public sphere, and the rationalized state? ○ What is the distinction between “public” and “private” uses of reason? ● Human beings are split ○ Luther: spiritual vs. earthly realms; my salvation vs. my activities in this world ○ Kant: i am purely rational being capable of exploring ideas for their own sake and I am a being who plays a role in society ○ In my purely intellectual life I am equal and even in a sense identical to everyone else ■ But in my status as a social being, i am always identified with my role, i.e., I am who I am as X,Y, or Z ● Luther and Kant ○ Luther’s paradox: ■ The christian is most free and equal to all, but christian is the servant to all ○ Solution ■ Free spiritually but bound by “temporal government” ○ Kant’s paradox: ■ We must be free to be enlightened, yet we must obey○ Solution: free as “scholars” or when we have a “public” use of reason, bound as citizens or when we have a “private” use of our reason ● “Private” use of reason ○ How i think and behave and


View Full Document
Download Euro Studies Class 18
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Euro Studies Class 18 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Euro Studies Class 18 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?