DOC PREVIEW
UMass Amherst PSYCH 241 - Psych 241 Study Guide Exam 1

This preview shows page 1 out of 3 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Psych 241 Study Guide Exam #1:What does the APA code of ethics provide, and to whom does it apply?The Ethics Code is intended to provide guidance for psychologists and standards of professional conduct that can be applied by the APA and by other bodies that choose to adopt them; states that psychologists may dispensewith informed consent when research involves naturalistic observation. All psychologists including students.What are the IRB and IACUC and who are they designed to protect, respectively?IRB – Institutional Review Board; committee established to review and approve research involving human subjects, ensures that all human subjects research will be conducted in accordance with all federal, institutional, and ethical guidelines.IACUC – Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee; to keep animals used in research safe & keep the research itself ethical for animal use.What do we mean by risk/benefit ratio, and who is considered in this ratio?Costs and benefits of a research project to the participants, society, the researcher and the institution. Is the research worth it? Are the benefits greater than the risks? Will the study produce valid and interpretable results? Researcher, subject, institution, society.What do we mean by minimal risk? What other types of risk must be considered?Harm or discomfort is not greater than that experienced in daily life or during routine physical or psychological tests. Physical injury (bodily harm), psychological injury (mental or emotional stress), social injury (embarrassment, exclusion).What do we mean by informed consent and why is this important for psych research?A social contract between research and participants, make clear to participants the nature of the research (what they will do) and possible risks of participating.What needs to be done when a participant can’t provide informed consent?Obtain legal guardian’s consent.Which dimensions are important in determining if informed consent is required?Required when risk is greater than minimal. Level, risk, nature of behavior, sensitivity, sharing, setting. What do we mean by privacy and what do participants have a right to know?The right of individuals to decide how information about them is communicated to others. How their information is protected and how their confidentiality will be protected.What three dimensions need to be considered when thinking about private vs. public behavior?(3 S’s) – Sensitivity of information, setting where data collected, method of dissemination of the information (sharing).When is it unacceptable to include deception in psychological research?The researcher should avoid deceiving participants about the nature of the research unless there is no alternative – and even then this would need to be judged acceptable by an independent expert. However, participantsmust be deceived as little as possible, and any deception must not cause distress. If you have gained participants’ informed consent by deception, then they will have agreed to take part without actually knowing what they were consenting to.What are the pros and cons of deceiving research participants?Pros – deception is necessary, the intentions are generally good, the ends can really justify the means, a lackof deception can sometimes ruin everything.Cons – even the best of intentions can go wrong, the potential for abuse still exists, the risk factors remain, the morality of the whole concept is extremely complex. When is it acceptable to include deception, and what must the researcher provide in the end?Without question, when it comes to psychological or sociological experiments, there are going to be situations in which you do not want the subject to know everything. In order for the experiment to be effective and meaningful, you are going to want to keep certain things from the patient at certain times during the experiment. Must provide a debriefing at the end that explains the study and what the participant was just a part of.Be prepared to identify and sequence the steps of the research process:1. Theory or general problem of interest (research question)2. Generate specific, testable hypothesis3. Design study and evaluate ethics4. Conduct study so as to achieve unambiguous results (evaluate internal and external validity)5. Collect and summarize data (descriptive statistics)6. Draw conclusions from these analyses (inferential statistics)7. Reject/modify/support original hypothesisBe prepared to distinguish between inductive and deductive theorizing:Inductive – theories to help organize empirical knowledge; "these results suggest X may be key..."Deductive – theories guide research by suggesting research hypotheses; "this theory suggests X will happenif Y..."Be prepared to list and describe the four main goals of scientific research:1. Description – events and their relationships are defined, classified, organized, etc.2. Prediction – based on observed correlations among 2+ variables we are able to predict behavior and mental processes3. Explanation – we can understand and explain a phenomenon when we can identify its causes (make a causal inference)4. Application – applied research often designed to solve a problemWhat are the two of the main reasons we conduct experimental research?1. To test hypotheses about the causes of phenomena2. To determine the effectiveness of a treatment/programWhat is the logic of experimental research and why is control important?To manipulate independent variable to observe effect on dependent variable, control is essential and is achieved through – manipulation of IV, holding other variables constant, & balancing. Appropriate control allows researcher to eliminate plausible alternatives & make a causal inference (IV caused change in DV). Without control confounding may occur, presenting a plausible alternative that caused change in DV.What are the three conditions that need to be met for internal validity?Co-variation of events, time-order relationship, elimination of plausible alternatives.What are the three main types of variables in any experiment?Independent variable, dependent variable, secondary variables.What do we mean by individual difference variables and why are they interesting?Characteristics of subjects that have potential for confounding; secondary variables reduce internal validity and the causal inferenceWhat are the three main types of independent group designs?Random groups design, matched groups design,


View Full Document

UMass Amherst PSYCH 241 - Psych 241 Study Guide Exam 1

Download Psych 241 Study Guide Exam 1
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Psych 241 Study Guide Exam 1 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Psych 241 Study Guide Exam 1 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?