DOC PREVIEW
Cuyamaca CHEM 141 - measuring density with different types of glassware

This preview shows page 1-2-3 out of 10 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 10 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 10 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 10 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 10 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

1Table of contents: Introduction to procedure/experimental/ method…………………………………………… page 2Accuracy and Precision of the three Glassware table……………………………………….. page 3Beaker calibration data and results………………………………………………………………….. page 3Graduated Cylinder Calibration data and results……………………….……………………… page 4Pipet Calibration data and results…………………………………………………………………….. page 5Accuracy and Precision of Coke and Diet Coke table……….………………………………… page 6Results and data for Coke…………………………………………………………………………………. page 6Results and data for Diet Coke………………………………………………………………………….. page 7Discussion and conclusion…………………………………….…………………………………………… page 8Post lab questions…………………………………………………………………………………………….. page 92Measuring Density with Different Types of Glassware Experiment This lab has two objectives, first objective is to try three types of methods to measure the precision and accuracy of delivering water from three laboratory equipment. These equipment are, beaker, a graduated cylinder, and volumetric pipet. The second objective is to find out which equipment is the most precise and accurate to use in finding the density of Coke and diet Coke. Also, a part of this experiment is to find the uncertainty of a specific equipment and what is the cause of the uncertainty. Every measuring equipment has an uncertainty range associated with it. However some measuring devices have greater uncertainty than other, and of course, the more expensive an equipmentis the more accurate and precise the results are. Error can and will occur while working on an experiment, it could be a random or systematic error. When a random error occurs we can detect it because unpredictable changes occur in the experiment. These changes may occur in the measuring equipment or in the environmental conditions. We can minimize the effects of random error by taking more data. Random error can be reduced by averaging over a large number of observations. In systematic error however, we can pinpoint the exact cause of the error and fix the problem. This is doing by finding the average, the mean, and the standard deviation of a given data.3Part IData/Results/Calculations:Accuracy and Precision of the three Glassware: Instrument Uncertainty Average VolumeStandard DeviationPrecision (good, fair, poor)True Value Accuracy (good, fair, poor)Beaker +/- 1mL 51.7mL 3.282 poor 50.0mL fairGraduated Cylinder+/- 0.1mL 10.10mL 0.6608 fair 10.00mL goodPipet +/- 0.2 10.03mL 0.01183 good 10.00mL goodI used a 50mL beaker, and filled with water then weighed the mass of both beaker and water. Then poured water out and weighed the beaker without water. I did this for three times.Average volume: 52.47+52.45+50.143=51.69Standard deviation:σ²= (52.47−51.69)〗〖(¿¿2+(52.45−51.69)2+(50.14−51.69)2)3¿=10.77σ²=√10.77=3.282Percent error:Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3Weight of the beaker with 50mL H2O 109.25 grams 109.18 grams 106.68 gramsWeight of the empty beaker 56.78 grams 56.73 grams 56.54 gramsMass of H2O delivered 52.47 grams 52.45 grams 50.14 grams% Error=51.69−50.0050.00x 100 %=2.98 % H2O Temp. 21.1Celsius4Object 11I used a 10mL graduated cylinder and a plastic bottle that holds approximately 125mL of fluid. Then I weighed the mass of the plastic bottle and used the graduated cylinder to transfer 10mL of water into the water and weighing the bottle after every addition of the 10mL of water for seven trials. Average volume: 11.620 +9.725+9.735+9.696+9.782+9.822+9.7407=10.101Standard deviation (11.620−10.101)2+(9.725−10.101)2+(9.735−10.101)2+(9.696−10.101)2+(9.782−10.101)2+(9.822−10.101)2+(9.740−10.101)27σ²=0.4367σ²=√0.4367 = 0.6608Percent error: % Error=10.101−10.0 010.00x 100 %=1.01 % H2O Temp. 21.1CelsiusWeight of plastic bottle 77.511 grams Mass of H2O delivered Weight of plastic bottle + 10mL H2O 89.131 grams 11.620 gramsWeight of plastic bottle + 20mL H2O 98.856 grams 9.725 gramsWeight of plastic bottle + 30mL H2O 108.591 grams 9.735 gramsWeight of plastic bottle + 40mL H2O 118.287 grams 9.696 gramsWeight of plastic bottle + 50mL H2O 128.069 grams 9.782 gramsWeight of plastic bottle + 60mL H2O 137.891 grams 9.822 gramsWeight of plastic bottle + 70mL H2O 147.613 grams 9.740 grams510 20 30 40 50 60 708.599.51010.51111.51211.629.739.749.79.789.829.74Graduated Cylinder CalibrationAmount of H2O Added in mLMass of H2O in GramsI used a calibrated volumetric pipet with a capacity of 10mL at 20 Celsius. I used a plastic bottle with capacity of 125mL and weighed it to obtain my tare weight. I then transferred 10mL of water into the bottle and weighed the mass of water and bottle after every addition of the 10mL water from the pipet. Average volume of the pipet::10.0396+10.0198+10.0409+10.01404=10.0286Standard Deviation for the pipet:(10.0396−10.0286)2+(10.0198−10.0286)2+(10.0409−10.0286)2+(10.0140−10.0286)24=σ²=0.00014σ²=√0.00014=0.01183Percent error for pipet: % Error=10.03−10.0010.00x 100 %=0.30 % H2O Temp. 21.1 CelsiusWeight of empty plastic bottle 102.3007 grams Mass of H2O delivered Weight of empty plastic bottle + 10mL H2O 112.3403 grams 10.0396 gramsWeight of empty plastic bottle + 20mL H2O 122.3601 grams 10.0198 gramsWeight of empty plastic bottle + 30mL H2O 132.4010 grams 10.0409 gramsWeight of empty plastic bottle + 40mL H2O 142.4150 grams 10.0334 grams610mL 20mL 30mL 40mL10.0110.0110.0210.0210.0310.0310.0410.0410.0510.0410.0210.0410.03Pipet Calibration Amount of H2O Added in mLMASS OF H2O IN GRAMSPart II Data/Results/Calculations:Fluid Uncertainty Average VolumeStandard DeviationPrecision(good, fair, poor)True ValueAccuracy(good, fair, poor)DeterminedDensity Actual DensityCoke +/- 0.2 10.192mL 0.2317 fair 10.00mL good1.019gm1.11gmDiet Coke+/- 0.2 10.250mL 0.4326 fair 10.00mL good1.025gm1.00gmI used a calibrated volumetric pipet with of 10mL capacity to transfer 10mL of coke into a weighed 150mL beaker, then subtracted the weight of beaker from weight of beaker


View Full Document

Cuyamaca CHEM 141 - measuring density with different types of glassware

Download measuring density with different types of glassware
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view measuring density with different types of glassware and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view measuring density with different types of glassware 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?