DOC PREVIEW
TAMU PETE 301 - csm_res_sim_I_hw2_fall_2009_sol (1)

This preview shows page 1 out of 3 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

PEGN 513 Reservoir Simulation I Fall 2009 Homework #2 Solution The 1D Buckley-Leverett problem was solved using the Explicit Upstream Weighted finite difference formulation. Considering the simplest form for waterflood of a linear core initially saturated with oil and at residual water saturation, the material balance equation (Equation 1) presented by Buckley and Leverett (1941) is, xfutSwtw∂∂−=∂∂ (1) where, Sw: water saturation t: time x: distance along path of flow ut: total interstitial velocity, φAquwt= fw: water fractional flow, ()( ) ( )wowwwwwSSSfλλλ+= qw: water injection rate A: cross-sectional area of the core φ: porosity mobility of water is, ( )()wwrwwwSkSµλ= mobility of oil is, ( )()wwrwwwSkSµλ= and the relative permeability is calculated as a function of saturation using, wnwrorwwrwrwrwSSSSkk−−−=1* onwrorworwororoSSSSkk−−−=1* Considering the space discretization shown in Figure 1, Equation 1 can be expressed in its discretized form (that applies for each space partition) as, xffutSSniwniwtniwniw∆−−=∆−−+1,,,1, (2) To improve the computation process and avoid using an imaginary grid block at the left of the first node, the following equation is used for the first node, 221,1,1,11,xffutSSnwnwtnwnw∆−−=∆−+ (3)PEGN 513 Reservoir Simulation I Fall 2009 2/3 These equations (Eqs. 2 and 3) can be solved explicitly for water saturation at the new time step (n+1). Figure 1. 1-dimensional core space discretization The Explicit Upstream Weighted Formulation described to solve the 1-dimensional Buckley-Leverett problem was coded in a MATLAB script, shown at the end of this document. Table 1 shows the values of water saturation for the 10 grid blocks at 10 days. Table 1. Water saturation values for the 10 grid blocks at 10 days Grid block index 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Sw (fraction) 0.68313 0.66975 0.66058 0.65302 0.64641 0.64045 0.63497 0.62986 0.62503 0.62045 A plot of water saturation profile as a function of distance along path of flow at every five time steps is show in Figure 2. The initial condition (at t = 0) corresponds to the horizontal line of constant water saturation equal 0.25 (i.e. Swr). The figure shows an increase of water saturation with time and how the water injection front propagates along the 1-dimensional core. 1 2 3 i-1 i i+1 IMAX-1 IMAX i-1/2 i+1/2 IMAX-1/2 1 1/2 1/2 ∆xiPEGN 513 Reservoir Simulation I Fall 2009 3/3 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 10000.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91Distance along path of flow (ft)Water Saturation (fraction) Figure 2. Water saturation profile along the path of flow at every five time


View Full Document

TAMU PETE 301 - csm_res_sim_I_hw2_fall_2009_sol (1)

Documents in this Course
Load more
Download csm_res_sim_I_hw2_fall_2009_sol (1)
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view csm_res_sim_I_hw2_fall_2009_sol (1) and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view csm_res_sim_I_hw2_fall_2009_sol (1) 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?