Radiation ShieldingFactors that affect radiation doseShielding materialTypes of radiation and shieldingGamma-ray shieldingGamma-ray shieldingBroad beamRelaxation lengthBuilding factor for concreteExample#1AnswerAnswer, cont.Answer, cont.Answer, contAnswer, contPhoton with different energiesExampleSolutionSol, cont.Sol, cont.Sol, cont.Shielding in X-Ray installationsShielding in X-Ray installationsPrimary Protective BarrierPrimary Protective BarrierPrimary Protective BarrierPrimary Protective BarrierSecondary Protective BarrierLeakage radiationLeakage radiationLeakage radiationScattered radiationScattered radiationProtection from Beta emittersProtection from Beta emittersExampleSolutionSolutionSolutionSolutionSolutionRadiation ShieldingAgen-689Advances in Food EngineeringFactors that affect radiation dose Regulations and procedures have been developed and implemented to limit radiation dose by regulating the use, storage, transport, and disposal of radioactive material by controlling time,distance and shielding Time The short the time spent near the source, the smaller the dose Distance The greater the distance the smaller the dose Shielding Use of materials to absorb the radiation doseShielding material Any material provides some shielding Iron, concrete, lead, and soil. Shielding ability of a material is determined by the thickness of the material required to absorb half of the radiation This thickness of the material is called the half-thickness Radiation that has passed through one half-thickness will be reduced by half again if it passes through another half-thickness (HT) The HT depends on the characteristics of the material and type and radiation energyTypes of radiation and shielding α−particles can be stopped, or shielded, by a sheet of paper or the outer layer of skin. β−particles can pass through an inch of water or human flesh. can be effectively shielded with a sheet of Al 1/25 of an inch thick. γ−rays can pass through the human body like x - rays. dense materials such as concrete and Pb can provide shieldingGamma-ray shielding Transmission of photons thru matter under conditions of ‘good’ geometry Since γ-rays exhibit a log relation between thickness and intensity, only partial reduction of the radiation can be obtainedNarrow beamRdR>>dxoeIxIµ−=)(xGamma-ray shieldingNarrow beamRdR>>dxoeIIµ−=x The particle flux for this situation is: The intensity from a point source radiation can be decreased by increasing the distance rfrom the source or the xof the absorber An absorber with higher µ can reduce the thickness neededxernAµπφ−=24Broad beam The measured intensity is greater than that of the good geometry Scattered photons will also be detected So, including a constant B:B= the building factors (B>1) Tables give values of Bfor different materialsxdetectoroΨ&Ψ&hvoΦ=Ψ&&xxoeBIIµ−=Relaxation length The thickness of a shield for which the photon intensity in a narrow beam is reduced to 1/e of its original value One relaxation length = 1/µ, the mean free path Dependence of Bin tables on shield thickness is expressed by variation with number of relaxation lengths, µxBuilding factor for concrete Can be obtained from tables as the average of values for Al and Fe:[]FeAlconcreteBBB +=21Example#1 Calculate the thickness of a lead shield needed to reduce the exposure rate 1 m from a 10-Ci point source of K-42 to 2.5 mR/h.Answerβ−β−K-42Ca-423.52 MeV82%2.00 MeV18%γ1.52 MeV With no shielding, the exposure rate at r=1 m is: An initial estimate of the shielding required is based on narrow-beam geometry. The number of relaxation lengths µxis:hRCEX /37.1)52.118.0(105.05.0 =×××==&31.61082.113705.23=×==−−xexµµAnswer, cont. The energy of the photons emitted by K-42 is 1.52 MeV From Table 15.1 (point source), for photons of this energy in lead and the thickness of 6.31 RLs, B= 3 To keep the required reduction (1.82x10-3) the same when the buildup factor is used, the number of RLs in the exponential must be increased The number yof added RLs that compensate a B=3 is:10.13ln31===−yeyAnswer, cont. Added to the initial value, the estimated shield thickness becomes: Inspection of Table 15.1 shows that B has increased to 3.5 Thus a better guess is y= ln3.5 = 1.25, with an estimated sheild thickness of 6.31 + 1.25 = 7.56 RLs It remains to verify a final solution numerically by try and errorRLs41.710.131.6=+Answer, cont Forµx= 7.56, a 2-D linear interpolation in Table 15.1: The reduction factor with buildup included is: Which is the same value given before.4.483.662.04.313.533.351.523.743.021.0107.567356.71084.153.3−−−×== eBexµAnswer, cont The mass attenuation coeff. is 0.051 cm2/g (Fig 8.8) With ρ= 11.4 g/cm3for lead, µ = 0.581 1/cm The required thickness of lead shielding is: A shield of this thickness can be interposed anywhere between the source and the point of exposure Usually, shielding is placed close to a source to realize the greatest solid-angle protectioncmx 13581.06.76.7===µPhoton with different energies Up to now, we have discussed monoenergetic photons When photons of different energies are present, separate calculations at each energy are usually needed Since the attenuation coefficient and buildup factors are differentExample A 144-Ci point of Na-24 is to be stored at the bottom of a pool. The radionuclide emits 2 photons per disintegration with energies 2.75 MeV and 1.37 MeV in decaying by β-emission to stable Mg-24. How deep must be the water if the exposure rate at a point 6 m directly above the source is not to exceed 20 mR/h? What is the exposure rate at the surface of water right above the source?Solutionlengths relaxation 62.5550020:mR/h 20 to thisreduce to505367521445050m 6 da of MeV2.75 from rate exposure MeV)1.37(for 061.0;2.75MeV)(for 043.01212111=⇒=======−−−xeR/h..**.dCE.Xcmcmxµµµµ&Sol, cont. RLsofnumber larger evena need weso6 Bshows Table 7, for RL41.779.162.579.1)6ln(is buildupofamount for this compensate that RLof # The RL)5.62 thickness thisof shieldwater afor photons MeV2.75for 6 (B 15.1 tableFrom11>>=+====xsoyµSol, cont.824 Table, From9.10)0430.0/061.0(70.7:coef. att. of ratio by thelarger is RLsin thickness thephotons, MeV1.37for /5.18550044.7Xphotons 2.75for 447gives Table in
View Full Document