DOC PREVIEW
UCSB ECON 1 - A subsidy for renters?

This preview shows page 1-2-3-27-28-29 out of 29 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 29 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 29 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 29 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 29 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 29 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 29 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 29 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Subsidies, taxes, and queuingTodayA subsidy for renters?Think, think, thinkShort-run analysisWhat happens?Slide 7Slide 8First-come, first-served policySlide 10The inefficiencies of long linesSlide 12Max, a single guy who likes to vacation in styleJill, a busy executive at a local firmThey book seats on 6:05 am flight to Denver tomorrowA tale of two people: MaxA tale of two people: JillCheck-in for United flight 6682EfficiencySuppose that United cannot overbook its flightWith overbooked flightsCost-benefit analysis of incentiveSlide 23Slide 24Pareto improvementsHypothetical cost-benefit analysis from United’s point of viewCost-benefit analysis from United’s point of viewIn the textWhat have we learned today?Subsidies, taxes, and queuing Today: Some methods that either hurt or improve efficiencyTodayMore on topics related to efficiencySubsidiesTaxesQueuing and first-come, first-served policiesA subsidy for renters?Recall that last time, we concluded that rent control had few (if any) winners and many losersSuppose that we wanted to find another way to help I.V. rentersHow about a $500 check per month for each renter of I.V.?Think, think, thinkAs aspiring economists, we need to examine whether a subsidy is a good ideaWe must keep in mindSubsidy is not a “benefit” in economic terms, but a transferMoney for subsidy must be raised from somewhereShort-run analysisIn this case, we will look at the short-run consequencesAssume for the near future, nobody can build new apartments or convert apartments to condosSupply is verticalWhat happens?Initial demand is DAfter subsidy is given, each person is willing to pay $500 more than before, changing demand to D’What happens?Before the subsidy, price is P2; quantity is Q1With subsidy, quantity demanded at price P2 is Q2In short-run, notice new price for apartments is P1This price is $500 higher than beforeWhat happens?All of the subsidy goes to the apartment owners (and we have not even found money for the subsidy yet!)First-come, first-served policyThis is essentially what happens todayWhen a vacancy occurs, the manager accepts applicationsIf the rent is at the market-clearing price:Each person willing to pay the price should find an apartmentEach apartment should be rentedFirst-come, first-served policyWhat if the apartment is not at the market-clearing price?If the rent is below the market-clearing price, long lines developIf the rent is above the market-clearing price, the apartment will sit unoccupiedThe inefficiencies of long linesIn 1978, airlines adopted a voluntary approach to overbooked flightsBefore this, people were allowed to board on a first-come, first-served basisRemember to think like an economist: Waiting time is a loss to society that nobody benefits fromThe inefficiencies of long linesEach person has a value of their timePeople on vacation typically have lower values of time than those traveling for workLet’s look at a tale of two people for a concrete exampleMax, who is ready to go on a skiing tripJill, who has a business meeting tomorrow in Denver at NoonMax, a single guy who likes to vacation in styleJill, a busy executive at a local firmThey book seats on 6:05 am flight to Denver tomorrowA tale of two people: MaxMax has shopped at Vons for the last 12 years in order to accumulate enough miles to book his free flightHe stays in Denver for one night before embarking on a two-week ski tour of ColoradoA tale of two people: JillShe receives a call tonight at 10 pmShe must be in Denver tomorrow for a Noon meeting tomorrow, or else her local firm loses a $2 million contractShe books an Economy seat to Denver for $775Check-in for United flight 6682 Max and Jill are the last two people to check-in for the flightJill is right behind Max in lineUnfortunately, only one seat is leftShould Jill be bumped?EfficiencyAs economists, we want to find a way for the most efficient outcome to occurAs an airline, we want to make ALL of our customers happyHow do we do this?Suppose that United cannot overbook its flightEmpty seatsHigher ticket pricesJill becomes desperate to find a way to DenverWith overbooked flightsVoluntary system to find a person with a low value of timeOffer an incentive so that someone is willing to travel on a later flightA First-class seat on the 1:45 pm flight to DenverCost-benefit analysis of incentiveMax’s cost of waiting in Santa Barbara for eight hours is low, since he was just going to check into his hotel and eat a nice dinner at a local restaurant$10 cost per hour, or $80 totalJill loses a big contract if she does not make the flight$50,000 total costCost-benefit analysis of incentiveAssume that either Max or Jill benefits the same from a First-class seat$200Max gains $120 by offering to give up his seat in order for Jill to attend her business meeting on timeHe instantly volunteers to give up his seat for JillCost-benefit analysis of incentiveGoing from a first-come, first-served policy to a voluntary incentive system has improved the outcomes of both Max and JillMax has improved by $120 and is traveling in style, just the way he wantsJill is able to make her meeting and save the contractPareto improvementsWhen one or more people are made better off without making anyone else worse off, these are known as Pareto improvementsIn our previous example, both Max and Jill were made better off without making any other passenger worse offHypothetical cost-benefit analysis from United’s point of viewUnited Airlines has determined in its computer system that the probability of the last First-class ticket being booked for the later flight is 0.05, at a price of $1200The marginal cost of an a First-class passenger over an Economy passenger is $50Cost-benefit analysis from United’s point of viewMarginal benefit of booking Jill’s ticket: $775Marginal cost of booking Jill’s ticket:Possible loss of First-class ticket being booked on the later flight, $60Additional First-class cost of Max’s trip, $50Total, $110United is better off with this policy, tooIn the textDemand curve is derived from reservation price (or highest willingness to pay)Max’s reservation price is low in this exampleJill’s reservation price is high in this examplePeople with low reservation


View Full Document

UCSB ECON 1 - A subsidy for renters?

Download A subsidy for renters?
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view A subsidy for renters? and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view A subsidy for renters? 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?