Dr. V.R. Bencivenga Economics 329 Spring 2012 MIDTERM #2: RIGHT ANSWERS 1. a. Define B = rate of return on bond fund. P(B > 3) = .15 + .1 + .05 = .3 Bond mutual fund 1 3 5 1 .05 .1 .15 .3 Stock mutual fund 4 .1 .2 .1 .4 7 .15 .1 .05 .3 .3 .4 .3 Define S = rate of return on stock fund. P(S > 4) = .15 + .1 + .05 = .3 Bond mutual fund 1 3 5 1 .05 .1 .15 .3 Stock mutual fund 4 .1 .2 .1 .4 7 .15 .1 .05 .3 .3 .4 .3 b. P(B > 3 S > 4) = .05 Bond mutual fund 1 3 5 1 .05 .1 .15 .3 Stock mutual fund 4 .1 .2 .1 .4 7 .15 .1 .05 .3 .3 .4 .3 P(B > 3 S > 4) = .15 + .1 + .05 + .15 + .1 = .55 Bond mutual fund 1 3 5 1 .05 .1 .15 .3 Stock mutual fund 4 .1 .2 .1 .4 7 .15 .1 .05 .3 .3 .4 .3 c. No, B and S are not independent. Independence requires P(Bi Sj) = P(Bi)P(Sj) for all i, j pairs. However (as one example), P(B = 1 S = 1) = .05 ≠ P(B = 1)P(S = 1) = (.3)(.3) = .09. Probability distributions are not required for full credit.d. Bond mutual fund 1 3 5 1 .05 .1 .15 .3 Stock mutual fund 4 .1 .2 .1 .4 7 .15 .1 .05 .3 .3 .4 .3 marginal distribution of B marginal distribution of S E[B] = 1(.3) + 3(.4) + 5(.3) = 3 Var(B) = (1 – 3)2(.3) + (3 – 3)2(.4) + (5 – 3)2(.3) = 2.4 E(S) = 1(.3) + 4(.4) + 7(.3) = 4 Var(S) = (1 – 4)2(.3) + (4 – 4)2(.4) + (7 – 4)2(.3) = 5.4 e. Conditional probability distribution of S given B = 5: S 1 4 7 P(S|B = 5) .15/.3 = .5 .1/.3 = 1/3 .05/.3 = 1/6 E(S|B = 5) = 1(.5) + 4(1/3) + 7(1/6) = 3 Var(S|B = 5) = (1 – 3)2(.5) + (4 – 3)2(1/3) + (7 – 3)2(1/6) = 5 f. Note that only four terms out of nine are non-zero—in the remaining five terms, at least one of the two random variables B and S has a value equal to its mean, and so that deviation equals zero. Cov(B,S) = (1-3)(1-4)(.05) + (5 – 3)(1 – 4)(.15) + (1 – 3)(7 – 4)(.15) + (5 – 3)(7 – 4)(.05) = – 1.2 g. Define X = rate of return on the portfolio (assuming equal investment in bond fund and stock fund) )SB(21X therefore 5.3)43(21])S[E]B[E(21]X[E Bond mutual fund 1 3 5 1 X = 1 X = 2 X = 3 .05 .1 .15 Stock mutual fund 4 X = 2.5 X = 3.5 X = 4.5 .1 .2 .1 7 X = 4 X = 5 X = 6 .15 .1 .05 P(X > 3.5) = .1 + .15 + .1 + .05 = .4 h. Define Y = dollar value of your portfolio one year from now (assuming $1000 in bond fund, $2000 in stock fund) S20B103000100S12000100B11000Y 31101103000)4(20)3(10SE20BE103000YE 1920)2.1(400)4.5(400)4.2(100)S,B(Cov)20)(10(2)S(Var20)B(Var10)Y(Var222. The probability that at least one defective item is selected is one minus the probability that none of the items selected is defective. Let X = number of defective items selected. X is a hypergeometric random variable. Then 63062604CCC1)0X(P1)1X(P- Let Y = number of items of extremely high quality selected. Y is a hypergeometric random variable. Then 630612018CCC)6Y(P- 3. a. X = number of teams to succeed in developing the new product X ~ b(n= 4, p = .07) The new product will be developed if at least one team develops the new product 252.)93)(.07(.C1)0X(P1)1X(P4004 b. Find n such that 3.)93)(.07(.C1)0X(P1)1X(Pn00n From part a, we know n = 4 is too small. Try n = 5: 3043.)93)(.07(.C1)1X(P5005 Therefore, the answer is n = 5. c. If the firm sets up n teams, expected profits minus costs of the teams equals: expected profits minus costs = – $1n + $20 P(X 1) + $0 P(X = 0) = – n + 20(1 – P(X = 0)) = – n + 20(1 – nC0(.070)(.93n) = – n + 20(1 – .93n) Evaluating we have: n expected profits minus costs 4 1.039 5 1.086 answer 6 1.060 NOT REQUIRED (but part of a full answer, if you ever encounter a similar problem in the real world!): The net profit function is concave in n since (i) expected benefits are positive for n = 1, and (ii) 20(1 - .93n) starts at zero and asymptotes to 20, while – n is negative and unbounded in absolute value. Therefore, n = 5 is the number of teams that maximizes net profits.4. a. X = number of defaults is a binomial random variable with n = 10 and p = .08 P(X = 0) = 10C0 .080 .9210 = .434 P(X = 1) = 10C1 .081 .929 = .378 P(X > 1) = 1 – .434 – .378 = .188 b. P(X = 0) = 15C0 .080 .9215 = .286 (smaller) c. Find the smallest n such that P(X = 0) .2 nn00n92.92.08.C)0X(P 20n0834.609.1n2.ln}92.{lnn2.92.n Note the direction of the inequality changes when we divide through by ln(.92), which is negative. Also, note we must round the solution for n up to the nearest integer. It is also acceptable to answer this question with a “trial and error” approach. 5. a. Since we want to calculate the probability of a certain number of occurrences per unit time, and the assumptions of the Poisson random variable are met, X = number of schools of fish found is a Poisson random variable. The Poisson parameter is the expected number of schools of fish located in one day of searching. The value of this parameter is: (area searched per day)/(average area per school) = 10,000/100,000 = .1 school per day b. 0952.9048.1!0)1(.e1)0X(P1)1X(P01. c. The value of the Poisson parameter must be adjusted for the second calculation. The expected number of schools of fish located in three days of searching is .3. 2592.7408.1!0)3(.e1)0X(P1)1X(P03. 6. a. State and graph the probability density function of X. The number of days ranges from 1 to 7 (the length of the interval of possible number of days is 6). otherwise07x1if6/1X f(x)
View Full Document