DOC PREVIEW
UT PHL 301 - Final Concept Review Day

This preview shows page 1 out of 3 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 3 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

1 PHL 301 Concept Review Day – Notes for Final - The exam will consist of 110 multiple choice questions, each worth 1 point, and will be comprehensive, though about 2/3 of the questions will be on the final third of the course (Metaphysics). The remainder 1/3 will be over highlights from the first sections. - REVIEW QUOTES!!! - Look back at old review slides PLATO - Plato's forms; Theory of Forms - The Divided Line: forms relate to objects of experience; world of experience (shadows, reflections, images) vs. world of forms (mathematics) - Allegory of the Cave: we can only see shadows of ultimate realities (forms, which exist independent of the mind) - What is Courage? - Internalist argument - Justified True Belief ARISTOTLE - Primary and secondary categories based on parts of speech - Substance (primary and secondary substance) o Primary: a thing; objects; entities (e.g. people, tables, chairs, stars) o Secondary: a kind of thing; species, type, kind (e.g. red, four-legged) - Criteria for substances: "this such"; being able to admit contrary qualities (e.g. a person can wear a red shirt one day and a shirt of a different color another day but still be the same person); no degrees (cannot be more or less...a human, a cat, a table) - Essential vs. Accidental properties o essential: composes identities (e.g. the quality of being human) o accident: temporary qualities (e.g. the quality of being barefoot) - Happiness is the ultimate end, virtue - Theory of Knowledge - Ethics - Contrary qualities - Realist: reality must exist indep. of the mind, even w/o consciousness; sensation; mind-indep. universe o a universe w/o can exist without consciousness, to exist, must have things within the universe that exist even with a lack of consciousness thus there are mind-indep. realities - Cause of perception = object of perception (the thing represented in perception) o when you imagine a table, the image of the table is causing your perception/conception of a table2 LOCKE - metaphysics; political philosophy - Empiricism - Tabula Rasa - Table exists indep. of our recognition of it so mind-indep. objects exist - Representationalist: things are represented in the mind - Distinction between primary qualities (really within the thing in itself) and secondary qualities (an effect of the table....e.g. brown color of the table) - Real essence of the thing vs. nominal essence of the thing o Real essence: understood in terms of primary qualities; more scientific definition - has essential qualities (e.g. atomic #7 = has 7 protons, if it did not have 7 protons it would not be itself) o Nominal essence: ordinary definition of the thing in terms of perceived (secondary) qualities; more abstract HUME - Inducted inference is not dep. on reason/rationale but rather practice - Object = bundle of properties; a construction; the result of our imposition of our perceptions on the world - Ship of Theseus (rebuilt same ship with old planks); sandpile example o changes occur quickly --> no longer same ship/sandpile o same changes occur slowly --> same ship/sandpile o thus the identity is affected by our perception - critic of all arguments for God's existence o miracles are so unlikely that we'd never have reason to believe a report of one o universe made by a committee o botched universes - everything is momentary/fleeting; universe/objects is/are a combination of momentary elements (sim. to Buddhist POV) - the self is also a construction out of momentary perceptions/emotions/ideas; there is no unity to you just like there is no unity to objects...you are just a bundle - metaphors for the self = theatre, commonwealth --> mind is a place where certain things happen KANT - Good will is only unqualified good - The Categories (very diff. from Aristotle's) - Synthetic a priori knowledge is possible - Phenomena: appearances, objects of experience, we can know them a priori (before the fact; indep. of experience) Q. How can we know objects of experience before we experience them?3 A. Inferences; you can form knowledge about the particular experience by amalgamating a composite knowledge from other experiences Ex: you can know what will be projected on the screen...how? you know from experience w/ the projector that there will be an image projected that is made of light (req. that you know what an image is as well) - Noumena: things in themselves; unknowable - moral argument for the existence of God - Vocab: sensibility, understanding, Copernican revolution, concepts vs. objects - first person to talk about concepts as rules for constructing experience - Transcendental Unity of Apperception: idea of noumenal self NIETZSCHE - "God is dead!" - Relativist, perspectivist, historicist (truth is relative to a certain historical era, likely the era of its origin) - Errors and fantasies - Biochemistry = foundation for higher things - values, ethics - Authenticity: being the person you are; values are determined afresh, once we come to a diff perspective, we must re-evaluate everything from the


View Full Document

UT PHL 301 - Final Concept Review Day

Download Final Concept Review Day
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Final Concept Review Day and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Final Concept Review Day 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?