DOC PREVIEW
UIUC MCB 502 - 06 T+PE

This preview shows page 1-2-3-4-5 out of 14 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 14 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 14 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 14 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 14 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 14 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 14 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

MCB 502A-2014. Lecture #6. Enzymatic synthesis of DNA.DNA polymerization directionalityIs enzymatic DNA synthesis directional, and if yes, is there a preferred direction? As you know, DNA degradation can proceed in both the 3’5’ and the 5’3’ directions along the DNA strands.Moreover, there are enzymes that can degrade DNA strands in both directions, like ssDNA-specific ExoVII. There are even enzymes, like ExoV, that can degrade both strands of the same DNA duplex at the same time. If DNA polymerization is anywhere similar to DNA degradation, then a priory we can assume that there are also three possibilities for the DNA polymerization directionality: 3’5’; 5’3’; both. To determine the directionality of DNA polymerization, one needs primed DNA templates that can be extended in one direction only: in either 5’3’ or in 3’5’. There are at least two ways to generate such primed templates:1) by terminal nucleotidyl transferase synthesizing single long nucleotides of the following structure: 5’-dA4000dT100-3’ or 5’-dA100dT4000-3’. There will be 3’-end primers availablein the former substrate, while 5’-end primers available in the latter. 2) by a partial hydrolysis of a duplex DNA with exonucleases of known polarities. For example, ExoVIII processively degrades the 5’-ending strands of duplex DNA and, thus, generates 3’-overhangs. Alternatively, ExoIII processively degrades the 3’-ending strands of duplex DNA and, thus, generates 5’-overhangs. The results of Kornberg polymerase reaction with the four templates are: Thus, whenever there is 3’-paired end, there is DNA synthesis, but whenever there is a 5’-paired end, Kornberg polymerase cannot synthesize the complementary DNA strand. Therefore, this enzyme can synthesize DNA in the 5’3’ direction only. One could arrive at the same polarity indirectly, by determining the polarity of the strange exonuclease activity of Kornberg DNA polymerase that is stimulated by DNA synthesis. The nick-translation reaction propagates the nick along the DNA by employing simultaneous DNA degradation and re-synthesis going in the same direction. Please recall that this exonuclease activity, although much inhibited, is still detectable in the absence of triphosphates. Its polarity is 5’3’ on dsDNA, so the polarity of DNA synthesis must be also 5’3’. Why 5’3’? Could we figure out the polarity of DNA synthesis by isolating precursors of DNA synthesis from cells (or determining them ourselves experimentally in vitro)? Monomeric precursors for Template + primer Paired end ActiondA100dT40005’ no synthesisdA4000dT1003’ synthesisExoVIII-treated dsDNA 5’ little synthesisExoIII-treated dsDNA 3’ significant synthesis1any biopolymer are different from the monomer units within the polymer in that one of their sideis "activated" by an energy-rich bond. In case of DNA, the monomer units within DNA are dNMPs (deoxynucleoside monophosphates), while DNA precursors are dNTPs (triphosphates), but which side of the dN is charged with PPP, — the 3’ or the 5’? There are no 3’-dNTP in vivo, only 5’-dNTP. Similarly, in vitro, only 5’-dNTP support DNA synthesis. Does the 5'-position of the triphosphates on the DNA precursors commit DNA synthesis to the 5’—>3’ direction? Surprisingly, no. Mechanisms of various polymer biosynthesis may be grouped into two broad classes: tail growth and head growth. The tail growth mechanism involves an attack of the non-activated end of a polymer on the activated end of a precursor. Examples of tail growth include polymerization of DNA, RNA and some polysaccharides. Head growth involves attack ofthe non-activated end of a precursor on the activated end of a polymer. Examples of head growth include protein synthesis, fatty acid biosynthesis and synthesis of O-antigen (Fig. 3-6 of Kornberg). Successful examples of head growth argue that there is no big reason why DNA should be growing tail-first rather than head-first.There is one nuance that makes the 5’—>3’ DNA polymerization preferred if you have exclusively 5’-dNTPs in the cell. In order to make polymerization unidirectional, the pyrophosphate, released in the reaction, is hydrolyzed to keep its concentration low (otherwise pyrophosphorolysis becomes a problem). The 3’—>5’ chain growth is still an option. However, once in a while, for the chemical reasons beyond cell's control that will be discussed later, DNA polymerase inserts a wrong nucleotide, say T opposite G. Still not a big deal, since all DNA polymerases have the so-called proofreading exonuclease activity (that we will discuss next). Theenzyme backs down one position and hydrolyzes the last incorporated nucleotide (dTMP). (Pyrophosphorolysis is not an option, because for pyrophosphorolysis to be efficient the enzyme should retain the outgoing pyrophosphate, which would make polymerization highly reversible, therefore inefficient). If the synthesis is tail-first, the enzyme is ready to go again. However, if thesynthesis was head-first, the 5’-end is not ready for synthesis restart, since it now has a monophosphate on it. The 5’-end needs to be charged with a pyrophosphate before the enzyme can continue, and this will require a separate enzyme and will translate into a significant delay. Therefore, with all DNA precursors 5’-dNTPs and the concentration of pyrophosphate low to make DNA replication unidirectional, it is argued that the efficient synthesis can go only tail-first, that is, in the 5’—>3’ direction, because even after proofreading, a polymerase is ready to polymerize again right away. By the way, the same 5’—>3’ direction of transcription, which has no proofreading, argues against the idea. The "transcription" argument against is a weak one, though, as the original replicative RNA-dependent RNA polymerases (in the original RNA-world) likely did have the proofreading function. Sadly, the notion that the 5'—>3' direction of DNA synthesis wasselected because it accelerated proofreading, as many other notions pertaining to what happened some 3.5 By ago, is generally impossible to test, so this nice idea is another example of "non-science". 2The proofreading activity of Kornberg polymeraseIn addition to the 5'—>3' polymerization and 5'—>3' exonuclease activity, Kornberg polymerase has the 3’—>5’ exonuclease activity against both duplex and ssDNA. It can be


View Full Document

UIUC MCB 502 - 06 T+PE

Documents in this Course
Load more
Download 06 T+PE
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view 06 T+PE and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view 06 T+PE 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?