DOC PREVIEW
UConn LING 1010 - Module 1 note

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

What is linguistics?What is linguistics?The publication of Chomsky's Syntactic Structures brought about a revolution in linguistics. Prior to this work, many linguists were concerned only with the description of languages. Chomsky argues that a grammar cannot be identified with any list of sentences compiled by a linguist. For example, a linguist goes out in the field to study Navajo first hand and lists every sentence he obtains from his native speaker consultants. Though he has been thorough and conscientious, he will not have identified the set of grammatical sentences in Navajo and thus will not have determined its grammar. This is because the grammar of Navajo should mirror the ability of the native speaker of that language to speak or understand an indefinite number of new sentences. That is, the grammar of Navajo (or any language) should mirror the knowledge of the speaker that enables him/her to produce new sentences not heard or spoken before. No list of sentences can do that, since as soon as the list is complete there can be new sentences spoken which are not in the list. Once again, simple observation is not adequate to the task at hand. In fact, if the set of sentences for any language is infinite, then simple observation, no matter how long it lasts, will not be adequate. Instead, a grammar must mirror the internal mechanism of the speaker/hearer that will generate an infinite set of sentences. Thus, in the same way that the Copernican theory of planetary motion abstracts from simple observation to a theory that makes predictions about where the planets will be at some future time, the grammar of a natural languagemust abstract from observed sentences to a theory of the internal mechanism of the speaker/hearer to predict an infinite number of possible sentences in the language.-The woman is sleeping.-John thinks the woman is sleeping.-Harry believes John thinks the woman is sleeping.-Harry believes John thinks the woman in the picture is sleeping.-Etc.For every sentence there is another sentence that is longer and includes it. The list of sentences, each one including the preceding one, can go on indefinitely. In a subsequent module we will look at a simple mechanism to produce these results. For now consider the following model for the acquisition of the ability to speak and understand an infinite number of sentences.Experience --> LAD --> GrammarIn the model, the LAD (Language Acquisition Device) is the internal mechanism that converts linguistic experience to knowledge of language. The grammar output of this device is the internalized grammar in the mind of the speaker that can produce and understand an infinitenumber of sentences. The experience that is input to the LAD is finite, limited to the time frame of the


View Full Document

UConn LING 1010 - Module 1 note

Documents in this Course
Load more
Download Module 1 note
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Module 1 note and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Module 1 note 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?