DOC PREVIEW
ISU ECON 201 - Analysis of MR
Type Lecture Note
Pages 2

This preview shows page 1 out of 2 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 2 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

Econ 201 1st Edition Lecture 40Outline of Last Lecture 1.Revenue Concepts for Monopoly 2.Marginal Revenue and Linear DemandOutline of Current Lecture 1.Analysis of MR ~ Quantity Effect & Price Effect2.Steps to Analyze Market Outcomes under Monopoly3.Policies for MonopolyCurrent LectureAnalysis of MR ~ Quantity Effect & Price Effect• If a monopolist increases Q, TR is affected two ways.– Quantity Effect: ΔQ×P2Price Effect: ΔP×Q1• Demand: P = 100 – 1Q Consider two points on D. – Q1 = 20 èP1 = 80 and TR = 1600– Q2 = 22 èP2 = 78 and TR = 1716 è ΔTR = 116– Quantity Effect: 2×78 = 156 Price Effect: – 2×20 = – 40Steps to Analyze Market Outcomes under Monopoly• Find output choice where MR = MC èQM. • Use Demand relationship to find Price èPM.These notes represent a detailed interpretation of the professor’s lecture. GradeBuddy is best used as a supplement to your own notes, not as a substitute.• Evaluate profit using Price and Average Cost: Π = (P – AC) x Q .• Evaluate efficiency through surplus concepts: TS = CS + PS• Deadweight Loss: – Difference between TS under full efficiency and TS under monopoly (i.e. competitive equilibrium v. monopolized market)– DwL= TSComp – TSMonopPolicies for Monopoly• Economists emphasize concern for efficiency: focus on DwL.– Distributional issues may also drive policy ~ the equity issue.– i.e. Monopoly profit may be perceived as unfair.Four Broad Options• 1. Structural Remedy ~ forced breakup; disallow mergers.• 2. Oversight Remedy ~ Public supervision of behavior.– Disallow predatory practices; Regulation of prices. – Price regulation common in utilities: Solution to Natural Monopoly.• 3. Government ownership ~ Profit is no longer firm’s objective.– Managers directed to serve citizens, not maximize profit.• 4. Do nothing ~ Viable policy in particular circumstances: – Demand highly elastic because substitutes are available.Market is contestable. Threat of entry limits Monopolist’s


View Full Document

ISU ECON 201 - Analysis of MR

Type: Lecture Note
Pages: 2
Documents in this Course
Load more
Download Analysis of MR
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view Analysis of MR and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view Analysis of MR 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?