DOC PREVIEW
UCSD ECON 139 - ECON 139 set 4
Type Lecture Note
Pages 20

This preview shows page 1-2-19-20 out of 20 pages.

Save
View full document
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 20 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 20 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 20 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
View full document
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 20 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience
Premium Document
Do you want full access? Go Premium and unlock all 20 pages.
Access to all documents
Download any document
Ad free experience

Unformatted text preview:

April 21, 2015Profit MaximizationHow do you draw the labor demand curve for a monopsonist? The monopsonist simultaneously picks w* and E*, so there is no labor demand curve for a monopsonist.Comparison with Perfect CompetitionThe firm is better off. In a monopsonistic labor market, W < VMPE Fewer people are hired than in a perfectly competitive market and wages are lower.Page 1 of 20 ECON 139 SP ‘15 Antonovics 4 4-21-15 1This is because the marginal cost of hiring an additional worker is higher for a monopsonist than for a perfectly competitive firm. Workers worse off relative to perfectly competitive labor market.Sport EconomicsMonopsony in Professional Sports Sports owners are a small and interconnected group. • Possibly can band together and act as monopsonists. • Main issue here is that the owners can set wages—that is, wages are not determined by perfect competition. • Two implications –*** The greater is a league’s monopsony power, the lower will be player salaries. – Players will be paid below their VMPE. • Note: in the reading they call the “value of the marginal product of labor” the “marginal revenue product of labor”.Page 2 of 20Salaries of Major League Baseball Players, 1876-1920From around 1876 – 1881, since professional players can’t decide where they wanted to go after contract ended as there was only one team, their wages dropped.After 1882, when the American Association started, the market became competitive, so the players’ wages went up.After 1891, Major League players’ wages dropped again until another league entered.Evidence on the Degree of Monopsonistic Exploitation • If an employer is a monopsony, then workers are paid less than the value of marginal product of labor.• How does the value of the marginal product of labor for players compare with their salary? • Two steps – Calculate how various measures of player performance affect a team’s winning percentage (MPE) – Calculate how a team’s winning percentage affects revenue (p) Page 3 of 20– VMPE = p × MPE • Estimates – Late 1960s: players paid 15-20% of VMPE.– Late 1980s: players paid 29-45% of VMPE. – Reserve clause effectively ends in 1976.Minimum Wage Laws State can set minimum wages higher than federal’s, but can’t be lower.• Federal minimum wage in 2009 $7.25/hour. • California minimum wage (as of January 2014) is $9.00/hour. • Not all sectors are covered. • Farm workers employed on small farms • Employees of seasonal recreational establishments • Salespeople at automobile dealerships• In 2012, 4.7 percent of workers earned at or below the Federal minimum wage (BLS).Page 4 of 20Theoretical Effect of Minimum Wage Laws Perfect Competition: • Minimum wages are a type of price floor. • Effectively change supply curve. • Decrease employment. • Extent to which demand drops depends on the elasticity of labor demand.o Good: more wage if you stay in the jobo Bad: employment level decreaseMonopsony and Minimum WagesWhen minimum wage laws are implemented in a monopsonistic market, then employment may actually increase.Before E’, the cost of hiring one additional worker is the minimum wage.The area of the yellow circle means: new MCE < old MCEPage 5 of 20Page 6 of 20What is the Effect of the Minimum Wage on Employment? Issues to consider: • We observe wages and employment, not supply & demand • Other changes in the economy also affect employment.Need Variation! Sources of Minimum Wage Variation: Page 7 of 20 State to state variation in the nominal and real value of the minimum wage. Can relate state variation in real value of minimum wage to state variation in employment rates.  Time series variation in nominal and real minimum wage. Can relate variation over time in the real value of the minimum wage with variation over time in employment rates Page 8 of 20The Ideal Study Design Control group – not getting the drugs• What would be the ideal way to study the effect an increase in minimum wage on employment?• How might a doctor test the effectiveness of a new drug?• Why would the doctor have a control group? • How would you design a randomized experiment to study the effect of a minimum wage?Study by Card and Krueger• Can’t conduct a randomized experiment. • Alternatively, use “natural experiments”. • Prior to April 1992, the minimum wage in NJ and PA was $4.25/hour • April 1, 1992 NJ raises its minimum wage to $5.05/hour • The minimum wage in PA doesn’t change.Data Collection • Survey 400 fast food establishments - Burger King, Roy Rogers, KFC, Wendy’s etc.- New Jersey and Pennsylvania • Asked them number of full-time and part-time employees • Before: March, 1992 • After: December, 1992Page 9 of 20April 23, 2015Implications of Card and Krueger Study • Suggests that the labor demand curve is upward sloping? • Monopsony? Inconsistent with observed increases in the price of fast food after the increase in the minimum wage.• Hungry teenager theory? Teenager minimum wage increase  increase demand for hamburger  more hamburger  more laborCriticisms of the Card and Krueger Study • No attempt to collect data on hours worked. • Big drop in employment in PA over 8 month time period. • Overall increase masks huge variation in both directions. • Measurement error—if you replicate Card and Krueger’s study with administrative data the estimated effect on employment is negative. • Response may be different in fast-food restaurants than other establishments. • Effects might be larger over a longer time horizon.Page 10 of 20 ECON 139 SP ‘15 Antonovics 4 4-23-15 10What are we to make of minimum wage laws? • Theoretically, they can reduce employment rates. • But, there are a number of empirical studies that suggest that increases in the minimum wage lead increase employment. Clemens and Wither (2014) decreasing employment, decreasing income growth• Still, not clear that increases in the minimum wage are the best means of fighting poverty—a large fraction of the people who benefit from increases in the minimum wage are teenagers from households that are not poor. It‘s a blunt instrument.Since a large amount of them are teenagers, so might not be the best wayLiving Wage Campaigns Currently Very ActiveA total of 130 places have living wage ordinances and living wage campaigns are underway in another 119 cities, counties and


View Full Document

UCSD ECON 139 - ECON 139 set 4

Type: Lecture Note
Pages: 20
Download ECON 139 set 4
Our administrator received your request to download this document. We will send you the file to your email shortly.
Loading Unlocking...
Login

Join to view ECON 139 set 4 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or
We will never post anything without your permission.
Don't have an account?
Sign Up

Join to view ECON 139 set 4 2 2 and access 3M+ class-specific study document.

or

By creating an account you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use

Already a member?