Political Economy of Land EconomicsThomas Hobbes (1588-1679)Thomas HobbesJohn Locke (1632-1704)John LockeLockePolitical EconomistsSlide 8Adam Smith (1723-1790)Adam SmithDavid Ricardo (1772-1823)David RicardoUnderstanding RentSummary – Understanding RentRicardoThomas Malthus (1766-1834)Thomas MalthusLabor Theory of ValueKarl Marx (1818-1883)Karl MarxJohn Stuart Mill (1806-1873)John Stuart MillMillFor further information:Slide 25Political Economy of Land EconomicsThe Ghosts of Natural Resource Economics PastThomas Hobbes (1588-1679)Thomas HobbesEach of us is motivated to act in such ways as we believe will relieve our discomfort, preserve and promote our own well-being.The natural state of human beings is in perpetual struggle against each other. To escape this fate, we form the commonwealth, surrendering individual powers to the authority of an absolute sovereign. The will of the sovereign for its subjects will be expressed in the form of civil laws that are decreed or tacitly accepted. If individuals make private judgments of right and wrong based on conscience, succumb to religious enthusiasm, or acquire excessive private property, the state will suffer.John Locke (1632-1704)John Locke“Natural Law” – men have “natural rights” not given to them by any rulerRights in property are the basis of human freedomGovernment exists to protect these rights and to preserve orderMen organize under a “social contract” to gain advantages not available individuallyLockeThis Contract of Society was the foundation of the Contract of Government, under which all political power is a trust for the benefit of the people, and the people themselves are at once the creators and beneficiaries of that trust. The State is based on a contract between ruler and subjects, who give him power only so that their own welfare is increased and their property protected in a way not possible in the State of Nature, where it may be taken away by unprincipled forces.Political EconomistsStudy of land gave emphasis to role of governments in defining and protecting property rightsAdam SmithDavid RicardoThomas MalthusKarl MarxJohn Stuart MillLockeSmithRicardoMalthusMarxMill1632-17041723-17901772-18231766-18341818-18831808-1873Hobbes1588-1679Adam Smith (1723-1790)Adam SmithOwnership of land is essentially nonproductiveReturns to land ownership are unearnedSecure, individual ownership might lead to improvementsQ = f( L, K)L = laborK = capitalWages – returns to laborProfit – returns to capitalRent – returns to land (natural capital)David Ricardo (1772-1823)David RicardoOwners of land may earn rent.Scarcity rentWhen land is homogeneous in quality but scarceDifferential rentWhen land is of different qualities; more fertile land produces more/earns more.Understanding RentFarmer SmithPoor land – max 10 bushels per acre of cornFarmer JonesFertile land – 100 bushels per acre of cornCapital costs – $10/acreLabor costs – $40/acreSummary – Understanding RentCorn PriceJones 100 bu/ac Jones Rent Smith 10 bu/ac Smith Rent$.50/bu TR = $50 TC = $50 None TR = $5 TC = $50$3/bu TR = $300 TC = $50 $250 differentialTR = $30 TC = $50$5/bu TR = $500 TC = $50 $450 differentialTR = $50 TC = $50 None$8/bu TR = $800 TC = $50 $450 diff.$300 scarcityTR =$80 TC = $50 $30 scarcityRicardoIs rent unearned income? Or is rent a legitimate cost of production that gets included in the price of the good produced?Conclusion: rent arises because of price of product, is a residual and is unearnedThomas Malthus (1766-1834)Thomas MalthusPopulation increases at geometric (exponential) rateFood supply increases at an arithmetic (linear) rateFood supply (and hence, population) constrained by natural productivity of limited land supplyLabor Theory of ValueThe value of a product is determined by the amount of labor used to produce it.Karl Marx (1818-1883)Karl MarxCapital and land are essentially unproductive without laborCapital is the product of labor exerted previouslyPrivate ownership of land allows owner to extract unearned rentImprovements to land exploit labor, taking away resources that should go to workersJohn Stuart Mill (1806-1873)John Stuart MillInherent fallacy in labor theory of valueTheory of DemandLandowner can use land to produce good in highest demand and increase his incomeOpportunity costsPrivate ownership would result in land being used in highest valued useMillPrivate persons should be allowed to hold title to land, not because there is any moral or natural right for them to do so, but because society as a whole is likely to benefit from the incentives which private land ownership hold outLand owners hold their land at the sufferance of society and in trust for societyLandowners should be legally compelled to manage land in a way consistent with the public goodFor further information:http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/m/milljs.htmhttp://csf.colorado.edu/psn/marx/Bio/Marx-Karl/km1869a.htmhttp://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/history/malthus.htmlhttp://www.bized.ac.uk/virtual/economy/library/economists/ricardo.htmhttp://socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/smith/farrer.htmlhttp://www.johnlocke.org/whowasjl.htmlhttp://www.philosophypages.com/ph/hobb.htmAssignment for Monday Jan. 24 –Read Field Chapter 2, “Natural Resources and the
View Full Document